Campus Três Lagoas, University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Três Lagoas 79600-080, Brazil.
Network in Exposome Human and Infectious Diseases (NEHID), School of Nursing of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, Brazil.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 9;17(9):3313. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093313.
We aimed to evaluate the impact of an educational intervention on the surface cleaning and disinfection of an emergency room. This is an interventional, prospective, longitudinal, analytical and comparative study. Data collection consisted of three stages (Stage 1-baseline, Stage 2-intervention and immediate assessment, Stage 3-long term assessment). For the statistical analysis, we used a significance level of α = 0.05. The Wilcoxon and the Mann-Whitney test tests were applied. We performed 192 assessments in each stage totaling 576 evaluations. Considering the ATP method, the percentage of approval increased after the educational intervention, as the approval rate for ATP was 25% (Stage 1), immediately after the intervention it went to 100% of the approval (Stage 2), and in the long run, 75% of the areas have been fully approved. Stage 1 showed the existence of significant differences between the relative light units (RLU) scores on only two surfaces assessed: dressing cart ( = 0.021) and women's toilet flush handle ( = 0.014); Stage 2 presented three results with significant differences for ATP: dressing cart ( = 0.014), women's restroom door handle ( = 0.014) and women's toilet flush handle ( = 0.014); in step III, there was no significant difference for the ATP method. Therefore, conclusively, the educational intervention had a positive result in the short term for ATP; however, the same rates are not observed with the colony-forming units (CFU), due to their high sensitivity and the visual inspection method since four surfaces had defects in their structure.
我们旨在评估一项教育干预对急诊室表面清洁和消毒的影响。这是一项干预性、前瞻性、纵向、分析性和比较性研究。数据收集分为三个阶段(阶段 1-基线、阶段 2-干预和即时评估、阶段 3-长期评估)。统计分析采用α=0.05 的显著性水平。应用了 Wilcoxon 和 Mann-Whitney 检验。每个阶段进行了 192 次评估,总计 576 次评估。考虑到 ATP 方法,经过教育干预后,批准率有所提高,因为 ATP 的批准率为 25%(阶段 1),干预后立即达到 100%的批准(阶段 2),从长远来看,75%的区域已完全批准。在阶段 1 中,只有在评估的两个表面上存在相对光单位(RLU)评分的显著差异:敷料车(=0.021)和女性厕所冲洗手柄(=0.014);阶段 2 显示了 ATP 的三个结果具有显著差异:敷料车(=0.014)、女性休息室门手柄(=0.014)和女性厕所冲洗手柄(=0.014);在第 III 步中,ATP 方法没有显著差异。因此,可以得出结论,教育干预在短期内对 ATP 产生了积极的结果;然而,对于 CFU,由于其高灵敏度和目视检查方法,并没有观察到相同的结果,因为有四个表面的结构存在缺陷。