Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, D-50937, Cologne, Germany.
Department I of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
BMC Cancer. 2020 May 12;20(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06920-3.
Over the past years, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) revolutionized treatment response. 1st-generation (reversible) EGFR TKI and later the 2nd -generation irreversible EGFR TKI Afatinib were aimed to improve treatment response. Nevertheless, diverse resistance mechanisms develop within the first year of therapy. Here, we evaluate the prevalence of acquired resistance mechanisms towards reversible and irreversible EGFR TKI.
Rebiopsies of patients after progression to EGFR TKI therapy (> 6 months) were targeted to histological and molecular analysis. Multiplexed targeted sequencing (NGS) was conducted to identify acquired resistance mutations (e.g. EGFR p.T790M). Further, Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) was applied to investigate the status of bypass mechanisms like, MET or HER2 amplification.
One hundred twenty-three rebiopsy samples of patients that underwent first-line EGFR TKI therapy (PFS ≥6 months) were histologically and molecularly profiled upon clinical progression. The EGFR p.T790M mutation is the major mechanism of acquired resistance in patients treated with reversible as well as irreversible EGFR TKI. Nevertheless a statistically significant difference for the acquisition of T790M mutation has been identified: 45% of afatinib- vs 65% of reversible EGFR TKI treated patients developed a T790M mutation (p-value 0.02). Progression free survival (PFS) was comparable in patients treated with irreversible EGFR irrespective of the sensitising primary mutation or the acquisition of p.T790M.
The EGFR p.T790M mutation is the most prominent mechanism of resistance to reversible and irreversible EGFR TKI therapy. Nevertheless there is a statistically significant difference of p.T790M acquisition between the two types of TKI, which might be of importance for clinical therapy decision.
在过去的几年中,表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)彻底改变了治疗反应。第一代(可逆)EGFR TKI 和后来的第二代不可逆 EGFR TKI 阿法替尼旨在改善治疗反应。然而,在治疗的第一年中会出现多种耐药机制。在这里,我们评估了针对可逆和不可逆 EGFR TKI 的获得性耐药机制的流行率。
针对 EGFR TKI 治疗进展(>6 个月)后的患者进行活检,以进行组织学和分子分析。进行多重靶向测序(NGS)以鉴定获得性耐药突变(例如 EGFR p.T790M)。此外,应用荧光原位杂交(FISH)来研究旁路机制的状态,例如 MET 或 HER2 扩增。
对 123 例接受一线 EGFR TKI 治疗(PFS≥6 个月)的患者进行了组织学和分子特征分析,在临床进展时进行了再活检。在接受可逆和不可逆 EGFR TKI 治疗的患者中,EGFR p.T790M 突变是获得性耐药的主要机制。然而,已经确定了 T790M 突变的获得具有统计学意义的差异:阿法替尼治疗的患者中有 45%发生了 T790M 突变,而可逆 EGFR TKI 治疗的患者中有 65%发生了 T790M 突变(p 值=0.02)。无论敏感原发性突变如何,或是否获得 p.T790M,不可逆 EGFR 治疗的患者的无进展生存期(PFS)均相似。
EGFR p.T790M 突变是可逆和不可逆 EGFR TKI 治疗的主要耐药机制。然而,这两种 TKI 的 T790M 获得存在统计学上的显著差异,这可能对临床治疗决策具有重要意义。