Department of Anaesthesiology/Division of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Cooper University Hospital, One Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.
Department of Cardiology, Cooper University Hospital, One Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.
Sci Rep. 2020 May 12;10(1):7852. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64753-3.
Cardiac output during cardiac catheterization is often estimated using the modified Fick method (CO). In this proof-of-concept, prospective non-randomized study carried out in a single academic healthcare centre, we examined whether replacing CO in the Gorlin formula with Cheetah-NICOM monitor cardiac output (CO) could produce an accurate and precise estimate of aortic valve area in patients with severe aortic stenosis. In twenty-six subjects, CO and CO were obtained concurrently. A spot and 3-minute running average of CO was used. Bland and Altman analysis was used to derive bias, 95% limits of agreement (LOA) and confidence intervals (CI). The mean difference (bias) between AVA (average) and AVA was 0.11 cm and the 95% LOA were ±0.42 cm. The 95% CI of the bias was 0.02-0.2 cm. The bias and 95% LOA of AVA (spot value) were 0.14 ± 0.42cm, with a 95% CI of 0.06-0.23 cm. No proportional bias was present. AVA thus appears to be a reasonably accurate measure of AVA in patients with severe aortic stenosis compared to AVA measured using a modified Fick CO. However, the limits of agreement were not narrow enough to consider AVA and AVA interchangeable.
在心脏导管检查期间,心输出量通常使用改良的 Fick 法(CO)进行估计。在这项在单一学术医疗中心进行的概念验证、前瞻性非随机研究中,我们研究了在 Gorlin 公式中用 Cheetah-NICOM 监护仪心输出量(CO)替代 CO 是否可以准确、精确地估计重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的主动脉瓣瓣口面积。在 26 名受试者中,同时获得 CO 和 CO。使用 CO 的单点值和 3 分钟平均值。 Bland 和 Altman 分析用于得出偏差、95%一致性界限(LOA)和置信区间(CI)。AVA(平均值)和 AVA 的平均差异(偏差)为 0.11cm,95%LOA 为±0.42cm。偏差的 95%CI 为 0.02-0.2cm。AVA(单点值)的偏差和 95%LOA 为 0.14±0.42cm,95%CI 为 0.06-0.23cm。不存在比例偏差。与使用改良 Fick CO 测量的 AVA 相比,AVA 似乎是重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者 AVA 的一种相当准确的测量方法。然而,一致性界限不够窄,不能认为 AVA 和 AVA 可以互换。