Suppr超能文献

Fick 心输出量法与 Cheetah-NICOM 心输出量法评估主动脉瓣口面积的初步比较研究

A Pilot Study Comparing Aortic Valve Area Estimates Derived from Fick Cardiac Output with Estimates Based on Cheetah-NICOM Cardiac Output.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology/Division of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Cooper University Hospital, One Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.

Department of Cardiology, Cooper University Hospital, One Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 May 12;10(1):7852. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64753-3.

Abstract

Cardiac output during cardiac catheterization is often estimated using the modified Fick method (CO). In this proof-of-concept, prospective non-randomized study carried out in a single academic healthcare centre, we examined whether replacing CO in the Gorlin formula with Cheetah-NICOM monitor cardiac output (CO) could produce an accurate and precise estimate of aortic valve area in patients with severe aortic stenosis. In twenty-six subjects, CO and CO were obtained concurrently. A spot and 3-minute running average of CO was used. Bland and Altman analysis was used to derive bias, 95% limits of agreement (LOA) and confidence intervals (CI). The mean difference (bias) between AVA (average) and AVA was 0.11 cm and the 95% LOA were ±0.42 cm. The 95% CI of the bias was 0.02-0.2 cm. The bias and 95% LOA of AVA (spot value) were 0.14 ± 0.42cm, with a 95% CI of 0.06-0.23 cm. No proportional bias was present. AVA thus appears to be a reasonably accurate measure of AVA in patients with severe aortic stenosis compared to AVA measured using a modified Fick CO. However, the limits of agreement were not narrow enough to consider AVA and AVA interchangeable.

摘要

在心脏导管检查期间,心输出量通常使用改良的 Fick 法(CO)进行估计。在这项在单一学术医疗中心进行的概念验证、前瞻性非随机研究中,我们研究了在 Gorlin 公式中用 Cheetah-NICOM 监护仪心输出量(CO)替代 CO 是否可以准确、精确地估计重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的主动脉瓣瓣口面积。在 26 名受试者中,同时获得 CO 和 CO。使用 CO 的单点值和 3 分钟平均值。 Bland 和 Altman 分析用于得出偏差、95%一致性界限(LOA)和置信区间(CI)。AVA(平均值)和 AVA 的平均差异(偏差)为 0.11cm,95%LOA 为±0.42cm。偏差的 95%CI 为 0.02-0.2cm。AVA(单点值)的偏差和 95%LOA 为 0.14±0.42cm,95%CI 为 0.06-0.23cm。不存在比例偏差。与使用改良 Fick CO 测量的 AVA 相比,AVA 似乎是重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者 AVA 的一种相当准确的测量方法。然而,一致性界限不够窄,不能认为 AVA 和 AVA 可以互换。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aec8/7217935/2b7f455910e0/41598_2020_64753_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验