• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

目前在经直肠前列腺活检前进行抗生素预防的常规方案:对瑞典所有泌尿科诊所的全国性调查。

Current routines for antibiotic prophylaxis prior to transrectal prostate biopsy: a national survey to all urology clinics in Sweden.

机构信息

Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden.

Department of Urology, Sundsvall Hospital, Sundsvall, 851 86, Sweden.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2020 Jan 28;9:58. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19260.1. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.19260.1
PMID:32399200
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7194489/
Abstract

The risk of infection after transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsies is increasing. The aim of the study was to assess the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for prostate biopsy in Sweden. All public and private urology clinics reporting to the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden received a survey on TRUS-biopsy prophylaxis. Of the 84 clinics surveyed, 76 replied (90%). If no risk factors for infection were present, a single dose of ciprofloxacin 750 mg was used by 50 clinics (66%). Multiple doses of ciprofloxacin 500 or 750 mg (n=14; 18%) or a single dose of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 160/800 mg (n=7; 9%) were other common prophylaxes. Most clinics gave the prophylaxes immediately before the biopsy (n=41; 54%). Urine dipstick was used by 30 clinics (39%) and rectal enema by six (8%). In patients with high risk of infection, the survey mirrors a large variety of regiments used. The preference to use a single dose of ciprofloxacin 750 mg is in accordance with the Swedish national guidelines for patients with a low risk of infection. Better compliance to the guideline recommendation to use a urine dipstick would probably increase the number of patients classified as having an increased risk of infection. Being classified as a high-risk patient should lead to an extended duration of antibiotic prophylaxis, however, the variety of regimens used in the high-risk group reflects an inability to treat these patients in a standardized fashion and also highlights a need for more clear-cut guidelines. Pre-biopsy identification of high-risk patients is an important issue to tackle for the urologic clinics in order to reduce the number of infections.

摘要

经直肠超声(TRUS)引导前列腺活检后感染的风险正在增加。本研究旨在评估在瑞典使用抗生素预防前列腺活检。所有向瑞典国家前列腺癌登记处报告的公立和私立泌尿科诊所都收到了一份关于 TRUS 活检预防的调查。在接受调查的 84 家诊所中,有 76 家(90%)做出了回应。如果不存在感染的危险因素,50 家诊所(66%)使用单剂量环丙沙星 750mg。其他常见的预防方案是使用环丙沙星 500 或 750mg 多次剂量(n=14;18%)或单次剂量复方磺胺甲噁唑 160/800mg(n=7;9%)。大多数诊所(n=41;54%)在活检前立即给予预防措施。30 家诊所(39%)使用尿液试纸,6 家(8%)使用直肠灌肠。在感染风险高的患者中,调查反映出使用了各种不同的方案。选择使用单剂量环丙沙星 750mg 与瑞典国家指南中针对低感染风险患者的建议一致。如果更严格地遵守指南建议使用尿液试纸,可能会增加被归类为感染风险增加的患者数量。被归类为高风险患者应该导致抗生素预防时间延长,然而,高风险组中使用的各种方案反映出无法以标准化的方式治疗这些患者,也凸显出需要更明确的指南。在进行活检之前识别高风险患者是泌尿科诊所需要解决的一个重要问题,以减少感染的数量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb91/7194489/1ee2743ad71e/f1000research-9-21108-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb91/7194489/1111016c0091/f1000research-9-21108-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb91/7194489/1ee2743ad71e/f1000research-9-21108-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb91/7194489/1111016c0091/f1000research-9-21108-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb91/7194489/1ee2743ad71e/f1000research-9-21108-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Current routines for antibiotic prophylaxis prior to transrectal prostate biopsy: a national survey to all urology clinics in Sweden.目前在经直肠前列腺活检前进行抗生素预防的常规方案:对瑞典所有泌尿科诊所的全国性调查。
F1000Res. 2020 Jan 28;9:58. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19260.1. eCollection 2020.
2
Current routines for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a web-based survey by the Swedish Urology Network.经直肠超声引导下前列腺活检的当前操作流程:瑞典泌尿外科网络的一项基于网络的调查
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012 Dec;46(6):405-10. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2012.691111. Epub 2012 May 31.
3
Comparison of Single and Prolonged Fluoroquinolone Prophylaxis and Risk Factors for Infectious Complications After Transrectal Prostate Biopsy.经直肠前列腺活检后单剂与长程氟喹诺酮类预防用药的比较及感染性并发症的危险因素。
Balkan Med J. 2018 Sep 21;35(5):373-377. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.2018.0477. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
4
Comparison of ciprofloxacin versus fosfomycin versus fosfomycin plus trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for preventing infections after transrectal prostate biopsy.比较环丙沙星、磷霉素与磷霉素联合复方磺胺甲噁唑预防经直肠前列腺活检后感染的疗效。
World J Urol. 2024 May 28;42(1):356. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05048-4.
5
Effect of Augmented Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Rectal Swab Culture-guided Targeted Prophylaxis on the Risk of Sepsis Following Transrectal Prostate Biopsy.经直肠前列腺活检术后强化抗菌预防和直肠拭子培养指导下靶向预防对脓毒症风险的影响。
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Jan 15;6(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
6
Ciprofloxacin resistance in the faecal carriage of patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.经直肠超声引导前列腺活检患者粪便携带的环丙沙星耐药性。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(6):946-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11637.x. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
7
Efficacy and safety of fosfomycin-trometamol in the prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy. Prospective randomized comparison with ciprofloxacin.磷霉素氨丁三醇预防经直肠前列腺活检的有效性和安全性。与环丙沙星的前瞻性随机对照比较。
Actas Urol Esp. 2014 Jul-Aug;38(6):391-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
8
Comparison between ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy.环丙沙星与复方新诺明在经直肠前列腺活检抗生素预防中的比较。
Turk J Urol. 2015 Mar;41(1):27-31. doi: 10.5152/tud.2015.22120.
9
A questionnaire survey of patient preparation and techniques for prostate biopsy among urologists in the Kyushu and Okinawa regions of Japan.日本九州和冲绳地区泌尿科医生关于前列腺活检患者准备和技术的问卷调查。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct;11(5):390-5. doi: 10.1007/s10147-006-0592-3.
10
Comparative Effectiveness of Single versus Combination Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Infections after Transrectal Prostate Biopsy.经直肠前列腺活检术后感染的单药与联合抗生素预防的比较效果
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Dec;59(12):7273-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01457-15. Epub 2015 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Cotrimoxazole and targeted antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy: a single-center study.复方新诺明与经直肠前列腺活检的靶向抗生素预防:一项单中心研究。
World J Urol. 2024 Apr 25;42(1):260. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04969-4.
2
The impact of pre-biopsy MRI and additional testing on prostate cancer screening outcomes: A rapid review.活检前MRI及额外检测对前列腺癌筛查结果的影响:一项快速综述。
BJUI Compass. 2024 Jan 31;5(4):426-438. doi: 10.1002/bco2.321. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Occurrence and significance of fluoroquinolone-resistant and ESBL-producing and complex of the rectal flora in Ghanaian patients undergoing prostate biopsy.

本文引用的文献

1
An Update of the American Urological Association White Paper on the Prevention and Treatment of the More Common Complications Related to Prostate Biopsy.美国泌尿外科学会关于预防和治疗前列腺活检相关常见并发症白皮书更新版。
J Urol. 2017 Aug;198(2):329-334. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.103. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
2
Fosfomycin antimicrobial prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: A prospective randomised study.磷霉素用于经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检的抗菌预防:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Arab J Urol. 2016 Jun 27;14(3):228-33. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2016.05.003. eCollection 2016 Sep.
3
Complications After Systematic, Random, and Image-guided Prostate Biopsy.
加纳接受前列腺活检患者直肠菌群中耐氟喹诺酮和产超广谱β-内酰胺酶菌及其复合体的发生情况与意义
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Nov 5;4(6):dlac113. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac113. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Comparison of Fluoroquinolones and Other Antibiotic Prophylaxis Regimens for Preventing Complications in Patients Undergoing Transrectal Prostate Biopsy.氟喹诺酮类药物与其他抗生素预防方案对经直肠前列腺活检患者并发症预防效果的比较
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Mar 20;11(3):415. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11030415.
5
Recent Trends in Prostate Biopsy Complication Rates and the Role of Aztreonam in Periprocedural Antimicrobial Prophylaxis-A Nationwide Population-Based Study from Korea.前列腺活检并发症发生率的近期趋势及氨曲南在围手术期抗菌预防中的作用——一项基于韩国全国人口的研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Feb 25;11(3):312. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11030312.
系统、随机和图像引导前列腺活检后的并发症。
Eur Urol. 2017 Mar;71(3):353-365. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
4
The augmented prophylactic antibiotic could be more efficacious in patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.增强预防性抗生素在经直肠前列腺活检患者中可能更有效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Aug;48(8):1197-1207. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1299-7. Epub 2016 May 9.
5
A single dose of meropenem is superior to ciprofloxacin in preventing infections after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies in the era of quinolone resistance.在喹诺酮耐药时代,单剂量美罗培南在预防经直肠超声引导下前列腺活检术后感染方面优于环丙沙星。
World J Urol. 2016 Nov;34(11):1555-1559. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1800-z. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
6
The role of targeted prophylactic antimicrobial therapy before transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy in reducing infection rates: a systematic review.经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检前靶向预防性抗菌治疗在降低感染率方面的作用:一项系统评价
BJU Int. 2016 May;117(5):725-31. doi: 10.1111/bju.13402. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
7
Potential burden of antibiotic resistance on surgery and cancer chemotherapy antibiotic prophylaxis in the USA: a literature review and modelling study.美国抗生素耐药性对手术和癌症化疗抗生素预防的潜在负担:文献回顾和模型研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Dec;15(12):1429-37. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00270-4. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
8
Comparison between ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy.环丙沙星与复方新诺明在经直肠前列腺活检抗生素预防中的比较。
Turk J Urol. 2015 Mar;41(1):27-31. doi: 10.5152/tud.2015.22120.
9
Prophylactic Antibiotics in Prostate Biopsy: A Meta-Analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials.前列腺活检中的预防性抗生素:基于随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Dec;16(6):733-47. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.040. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
10
Adherence to European Association of Urology Guidelines on Prophylactic Antibiotics: An Important Step in Antimicrobial Stewardship.遵守欧洲泌尿外科学会关于预防性抗生素使用的指南:抗菌药物管理的重要步骤。
Eur Urol. 2016 Feb;69(2):276-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 May 20.