Tamborini Marco
Institut für Philosophie, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Karolinenplatz 5, 64289, Darmstadt, Germany.
J Hist Biol. 2020 Jun;53(2):269-294. doi: 10.1007/s10739-020-09604-7.
In this paper, I argue that the German morphological tradition made a major contribution to twentieth-century study of form. Several scientists paved the way for this research: paleontologist Adolf Seilacher (1925-2014), entomologist Hermann Weber (1899-1956), and biologist Johann-Gerhard Helmcke (1908-1993) together with architect Frei Otto (1925-2015). All of them sought to examine morphogenetic processes to illustrate their inherent structural properties, thus challenging the neo-Darwinian framework of evolutionary theory. I point out that the German theoretical challenge to adaptationist thinking was possible through an exchange and transfer of practices, data, technologies, and knowledge between biologically oriented students of form and architects, designers, and engineers. This exchange of practices and knowledge was facilitated by the establishment of two collaborative research centers at the beginning of the 1970s. Hence, by showing the richness of topics, methods, and technologies discussed in German-speaking morphology between 1950 and the 1970s, this paper paves the way to a much broader comprehension of the shifts that have shaped twentieth-century evolutionary biology.
在本文中,我认为德国形态学传统对20世纪的形式研究做出了重大贡献。几位科学家为这项研究铺平了道路:古生物学家阿道夫·赛拉赫(1925 - 2014)、昆虫学家赫尔曼·韦伯(1899 - 1956)、生物学家约翰 - 格哈德·黑尔姆克(1908 - 1993)以及建筑师 Frei Otto(1925 - 2015)。他们都试图研究形态发生过程,以阐明其内在的结构特性,从而挑战了进化理论的新达尔文主义框架。我指出,德国对适应主义思维的理论挑战之所以成为可能,是因为在以生物学为导向的形式研究者与建筑师、设计师和工程师之间,存在着实践、数据、技术和知识的交流与转移。20世纪70年代初两个合作研究中心的建立促进了这种实践和知识的交流。因此,通过展示1950年至20世纪70年代德语形态学中所讨论的主题、方法和技术的丰富性,本文为更广泛地理解塑造20世纪进化生物学的转变铺平了道路。