Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.
Departamento de Enfermagem Materno-Infantil, Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2020;41(spe):e20190154. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2020.20190154. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
To determine the prevalence of skin-to-skin contact (STSC) and breastfeeding (BF) stimulation, as well as the reasons for these practices not to be performed; to identify whether women were given information on these practices along the pre-natal monitoring.
A cross-sectional study carried out in a university hospital with 586 women. Data collection was from February to September 2016. Data was collected from patient records and from a questionnaire. A descriptive analysis was performed.
Immediately after birth, 60.1% of the newborns (NBs) had STSC, and 44.9% were stimulated to suck at the breast. After primary care, 24.1% had STSC, and 69.3% were stimulated to suck at the breast; 47.7% of the newborns did not have STSC due to their unfavorable clinical conditions; 79.2% of the women were not able to inform the reason why BF was not stimulated; 58.5% of the women had pre-natal guidance about STSC, and 90.8% about BF.
Both STSC and BF rates could be improved, in view of the benefits provided by these practices.
确定皮肤接触（STSC）和母乳喂养（BF）刺激的流行率，以及这些做法未实施的原因；确定女性在产前监测期间是否获得了关于这些做法的信息。
这是在一所大学附属医院进行的横断面研究，共纳入了 586 名女性。数据收集时间为 2016 年 2 月至 9 月。数据来自病历和问卷调查。进行描述性分析。
新生儿（NB）出生后立即进行 STSC 的比例为 60.1%，刺激吸吮乳房的比例为 44.9%。初级保健后，进行 STSC 的比例为 24.1%，刺激吸吮乳房的比例为 69.3%；47.7%的新生儿因临床状况不佳而未进行 STSC；79.2%的女性无法告知未刺激 BF 的原因；58.5%的女性在产前接受了关于 STSC 的指导，90.8%的女性接受了关于 BF 的指导。
鉴于这些做法带来的益处，STSC 和 BF 的比例都可以提高。
