Department of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
Division of Behavioral Health, Nemours/A.I. DuPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Jul 15;51(3):795-806. doi: 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-19-00084. Epub 2020 May 13.
Purpose Play is a critical aspect of children's development, and researchers have long argued that symbolic deficits in play may be diagnostic of developmental disabilities. This study examined whether deficits in play emerge as a function of developmental disabilities and whether our perceptions of play are colored by differences in language and behavioral presentations. Method Ninety-three children participated in this study (typically developing [TD]; = 23, developmental language disorders [DLD]; = 24, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD]; = 26, and autism spectrum disorder [ASD]; = 20). Children were videotaped engaging in free-play. Children's symbolic play (imagination, organization, elaboration, and comfort) was scored under conditions of both audible language and no audible language to assess diagnostic group differences in play and whether audible language impacted raters' perception of play. Results Significant differences in play were evident across diagnostic groups. The presence of language did not alter play ratings for the TD group, but differences were found among the other diagnostic groups. When language was audible, children with DLD and ASD (but not ADHD) were scored poorly on play compared to their TD peers. When language was not audible, children with DLD were perceived to play better than when language was audible. Conversely, children with ADHD showed organizational deficits when language was not available to support their play. Finally, children with ASD demonstrated poor play performance regardless of whether language was audible or not. Conclusions Language affects our understanding of play skills in some young children. Parents, researchers, and clinicians must be careful not to underestimate or overestimate play based on language presentation. Differential skills in language have the potential to unduly influence our perceptions of play for children with developmental disabilities.
游戏是儿童发展的关键方面,研究人员长期以来一直认为,游戏中的象征性缺陷可能是发育障碍的诊断标志。本研究考察了游戏缺陷是否随着发育障碍的出现而出现,以及我们对游戏的看法是否因语言和行为表现的差异而有所不同。
93 名儿童参与了这项研究(典型发育[TD];n=23,发育性语言障碍[DLD];n=24,注意缺陷/多动障碍[ADHD];n=26,自闭症谱系障碍[ASD];n=20)。孩子们被录像,让他们自由玩耍。在有声音语言和无声音语言的情况下,对孩子们的象征性游戏(想象力、组织、精心设计和舒适)进行评分,以评估游戏中的诊断组差异,以及声音语言是否会影响评分者对游戏的看法。
在不同的诊断组中,游戏表现存在显著差异。语言的存在并没有改变 TD 组对游戏的评分,但在其他诊断组中发现了差异。当语言是可听见的时,与 TD 同龄人相比,患有 DLD 和 ASD 的儿童在游戏中表现不佳,但 ADHD 儿童的游戏评分不受影响。当语言不可听见时,与语言可听见时相比,患有 DLD 的儿童被认为表现更好。相反,当语言不可用时,患有 ADHD 的儿童表现出组织缺陷。最后,无论语言是否可听见,患有 ASD 的儿童的游戏表现都很差。
语言会影响我们对一些幼儿游戏技能的理解。家长、研究人员和临床医生必须小心,不要根据语言表现来低估或高估游戏。语言方面的差异技能有可能对我们对发育障碍儿童游戏的看法产生不当影响。