Suppr超能文献

全球外科正反方辩论:通往双边学术成功之路还是殖民主义的大胆新面貌?

Global Surgery Pro-Con Debate: A Pathway to Bilateral Academic Success or the Bold New Face of Colonialism?

作者信息

Scheiner Alyssa, Rickard Jennifer L, Nwomeh Benedict, Jawa Randeep S, Ginzburg Enrique, Fitzgerald Tamara N, Charles Anthony, Bekele Abebe

机构信息

Division of Trauma, Department of Surgery, Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York.

Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2020 Aug;252:272-280. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.01.032. Epub 2020 May 10.

Abstract

Global surgery, especially academic global surgery, is of tremendous interest to many surgeons. Classically, it entails personnel from high-income countries going to low- and middle-income countries and engaging in educational activities as well as procedures. Academic medical personnel have included students, residents, and attendings. The pervasive notion is that this is a win-win situation for the volunteers and the hosts, that is, a pathway to bilateral academic success. However, a critical examination demonstrates that it can easily become the bold new face of colonialism of a low- and middle-income country by a high-income country.

摘要

全球外科手术,尤其是学术性全球外科手术,引起了许多外科医生的极大兴趣。传统上,它需要高收入国家的人员前往低收入和中等收入国家,并开展教育活动以及实施手术。学术医疗人员包括学生、住院医师和主治医师。普遍的观念是,这对志愿者和接待方来说是一种双赢局面,也就是说,是一条通向双边学术成功的途径。然而,批判性审视表明,它很容易成为高收入国家对低收入和中等收入国家进行殖民主义的大胆新面貌。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验