Suppr超能文献

多学科联合血管外科手术提高肿瘤切除术患者的预后。

A Multidisciplinary Approach to Oncological Resections with Vascular Surgeons Improves Patient Outcomes.

机构信息

Trauma & Surgical Oncology Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Adelaide Health Technology Assessment, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Aug;60(2):293-299. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.04.011. Epub 2020 May 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Oncological resections have become more radical in pursuit of disease free margins. Consequently, vascular structures may be injured inadvertently or purposely resected, with or without subsequent reconstruction. Thus, vascular surgeons have an increasing role in oncological surgery. The present authors sought to review their experience and examine the effect of timing of referral to a Vascular Surgeon (VS) on patient and surgical outcomes following tumour resection.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of a prospectively maintained database at a public hospital network in Adelaide, Australia. All cases of collaboration between a VS and other surgeons for resection of cancer or non-malignant tumour were included. Medical records and operative, pathological, and transfusion data were reviewed, with particular attention to referring team, timing of VS referral (pre- or intra-operative), and the operative role of the VS.

RESULTS

Seventy-two cases were identified from January 2004 to June 2018. The most common collaborators were General Surgery and Urology. Of the cases, 86% were elective and 71% were referred to the VS pre-operatively. Pre-operative referral was associated with a predominant VS role of dissection and exposure. Pre-operative referral was associated with lower odds of vessel repair and reconstruction compared with intra-operative referral (adjusted OR = 0.20; 95% CI 0.04-0.93; p = .040) and a lower incidence of positive surgical margins (35% vs. 80%, p = .028). The rate of blood product units required was lower among pre-operative referrals relative to intra-operative referrals, but the effect of timing was not significant after adjustment for potential confounders (IRR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.26-2.44; p = .70).

CONCLUSION

Pre-operative planned involvement of vascular surgery in oncological operations can improve surgical outcomes, with additional expected benefits for surgical training and cross specialty collaboration.

摘要

目的

为了追求无肿瘤切缘,肿瘤切除术变得更加激进。因此,血管结构可能会被意外或故意损伤,同时可能会进行或不进行后续重建。因此,血管外科医生在肿瘤外科中发挥着越来越重要的作用。作者旨在回顾他们的经验,并研究血管外科医生(VS)转诊时机对肿瘤切除术后患者和手术结果的影响。

方法

对澳大利亚阿德莱德一家公立医院网络的前瞻性维护数据库进行了回顾性研究。所有 VS 与其他外科医生合作切除癌症或非恶性肿瘤的病例均被纳入研究。对病历和手术、病理和输血数据进行了回顾,特别关注转诊团队、VS 转诊时间(术前或术中)以及 VS 的手术角色。

结果

从 2004 年 1 月至 2018 年 6 月,共确定了 72 例病例。最常见的协作科室是普通外科和泌尿科。其中 86%为择期手术,71%在术前转诊至 VS。术前转诊与 VS 主要负责解剖和显露有关。与术中转诊相比,术前转诊与血管修复和重建的可能性较低(校正 OR=0.20;95%CI 0.04-0.93;p=0.040),且阳性切缘的发生率也较低(35% vs. 80%,p=0.028)。与术中转诊相比,术前转诊所需的血制品单位较少,但在调整潜在混杂因素后,这种时间效应并不显著(IRR=0.80,95%CI 0.26-2.44;p=0.70)。

结论

术前计划性地让血管外科参与肿瘤手术可以改善手术结果,同时对手术培训和跨专业合作也有额外的预期益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验