School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
School of Medicine, Division of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Psychol Health. 2021 Apr;36(4):478-495. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2020.1766043. Epub 2020 May 14.
Screening mammography has potential benefits as well as harms, but these are not always communicated to women. We therefore explored how women discuss screening mammography, the subject positions made available in their discourse, and the implications of these for informed choice. We conducted 16 individual interviews with women aged 44-72 years who were attenders ( = 11) and non-attenders ( = 5) of screening, and analysed transcripts through Foucauldian Discourse Analysis. A semi-structured interview guide, informed by literature and researcher expertise, was used to collect data. The women constructed screening mammography as either helpful or potentially harmful. We identified three subject positions-The Responsible Woman (who attends screening), The Irresponsible Woman (who does not attend screening), and the Judicious Woman (who engages in alternate breast health practices). These subject positions have the potential to limit women's choices, constrain shared decision-making with health professionals, and restrict women's engagement in risk-reducing behaviours. An expanded range of options ultimately offers an alternate future in which women's autonomy to control their own bodies is better supported.
乳房 X 光筛查既有潜在益处,也存在潜在危害,但这些信息并非总能传达给女性。因此,我们探讨了女性如何讨论乳房 X 光筛查、她们的话语中提供了哪些立场,以及这些立场对知情选择的影响。我们对 16 名年龄在 44-72 岁的女性进行了个体访谈,这些女性中包括筛查的参与者(11 人)和非参与者(5 人),并通过福柯的话语分析对转录文本进行了分析。半结构化访谈指南是根据文献和研究人员的专业知识制定的,用于收集数据。这些女性将乳房 X 光筛查描述为有益或潜在有害。我们确定了三个主体立场:负责任的女性(参加筛查)、不负责任的女性(不参加筛查)和明智的女性(采取其他乳房健康措施)。这些立场有可能限制女性的选择,限制与卫生专业人员共同决策,并限制女性采取降低风险的行为。更广泛的选择范围最终提供了一个替代的未来,在这个未来中,女性控制自己身体的自主权将得到更好的支持。