Suppr超能文献

梯度压力弹力袜作为择期手术患者药物性血栓预防的辅助治疗(GAPS 研究):随机对照试验。

Graduated compression stockings as adjuvant to pharmaco-thromboprophylaxis in elective surgical patients (GAPS study): randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London & Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, UK.

Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2020 May 13;369:m1309. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1309.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether the use of graduated compression stockings (GCS) offers any adjuvant benefit when pharmaco-thromboprophylaxis is used for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing elective surgery.

DESIGN

Open, multicentre, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

SETTING

Seven National Health Service tertiary hospitals in the United Kingdom.

PARTICIPANTS

1905 elective surgical inpatients (≥18 years) assessed as being at moderate or high risk of venous thromboembolism were eligible and consented to participate.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) pharmaco-thromboprophylaxis alone or LMWH pharmaco-thromboprophylaxis and GCS.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was imaging confirmed lower limb deep vein thrombosis with or without symptoms, or pulmonary embolism with symptoms within 90 days of surgery. Secondary outcome measures were quality of life, compliance with stockings and LMWH, lower limb complications related to GCS, bleeding complications, adverse reactions to LMWH, and all cause mortality.

RESULTS

Between May 2016 and January 2019, 1905 participants were randomised. 1858 were included in the intention to treat analysis (17 were identified as ineligible after randomisation and 30 did not undergo surgery). A primary outcome event occurred in 16 of 937 (1.7%) patients in the LMWH alone group compared with 13 of 921 (1.4%) in the LMWH and GCS group. The risk difference between the two groups was 0.30% (95% confidence interval -0.65% to 1.26%). Because the 95% confidence interval did not cross the non-inferiority margin of 3.5% (P<0.001 for non-inferiority), LMWH alone was confirmed to be non-inferior.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients who have elective surgery and are at moderate or high risk of venous thromboembolism, administration of pharmaco-thromboprophylaxis alone is non-inferior to a combination of pharmaco-thromboprophylaxis and GCS. These findings indicate that GCS might be unnecessary in most patients undergoing elective surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN13911492.

摘要

目的

研究在择期手术患者中使用药物血栓预防时,使用分级加压弹力袜(GCS)是否能提供辅助获益。

设计

开放、多中心、随机、对照、非劣效性试验。

地点

英国 7 家国民保健服务三级医院。

参与者

1905 名接受择期手术的住院患者(≥18 岁),评估为中危或高危静脉血栓栓塞,符合条件并同意参与。

干预措施

参与者以 1:1 的比例随机分配(1:1)接受低分子肝素(LMWH)药物血栓预防单独治疗或 LMWH 药物血栓预防联合 GCS。

主要结局

主要结局是手术 90 天内影像学证实的下肢深静脉血栓形成伴或不伴症状,或有症状的肺栓塞。次要结局是生活质量、GCS 和 LMWH 的依从性、与 GCS 相关的下肢并发症、出血并发症、LMWH 的不良反应和全因死亡率。

结果

2016 年 5 月至 2019 年 1 月期间,共纳入 1905 名参与者进行随机分组。1858 名参与者进行意向治疗分析(17 名在随机分组后被确定为不合格,30 名未进行手术)。LMWH 单独组 937 名患者中有 16 例(1.7%)发生主要结局事件,LMWH 和 GCS 组 921 名患者中有 13 例(1.4%)。两组间的风险差异为 0.30%(95%置信区间-0.65%至 1.26%)。由于 95%置信区间未穿过 3.5%的非劣效性边界(P<0.001 表示非劣效性),因此证实 LMWH 单独治疗不劣于联合治疗。

结论

对于接受择期手术且静脉血栓栓塞风险为中高危的患者,单独使用药物血栓预防治疗不劣于药物血栓预防联合 GCS。这些发现表明,在大多数接受择期手术的患者中,GCS 可能不是必需的。

试验注册

ISRCTN8500610。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15a5/7219517/e4cc24663f35/shaj053785.va.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验