Lymphocyte and monocyte vitamin D receptor expression during paricalcitol or calcitriol treatments in patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease.

PURPOSE

In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of paricalcitol and calcitriol usage on vitamin D receptor (VDR) contents of CD8+ , CD4+ lymphocytes and monocytes in stage 5d chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients.

METHODS

Thirty-six hemodialysis patients older than 18 years of age and 19 healthy controls (group HC) without any known acute or chronic diseases were included in the study. The group of patients undergoing scheduled hemodialysis comprised three subgroups: group CL: patients on calcitriol (n: 10), group PC: patients on paricalcitol (n: 13), and group NT: patients not taking any vitamin D or VDR activating medications (n: 13). CD8+/VDR, CD4+/VDR and MONO/VDR values were representing the ratio of VDR representing cells among related cell group. On the other hand, values of CD8+/MFI, CD4+/MFI and MONO/MFI have shown the total amount of cellular VDR content per cell which has been given as of mean fluorescence intensity in the flow cytometric process. Main CKD mineral bone disorder parameters such as a hemogram, serum BUN, creatinine, albumin, Ca, iP, iPTH, 25(OH)D levels were also measured.

RESULTS

Average VDR contents in CD8+, CD4+ and monocytes were not different among three patient groups on hemodialysis. But in all hemodialysis subgroups, CD8+/VDR, CD4+/VDR, MONO/VDR, CD8+/MFI, CD4+/MFI and MONO/MFI levels were found to be higher compared with the healthy control subjects (p < 0.001). Among hemodialysis groups, no significant CD8+/VDR, CD4+/VDR, and MONO/VDR content differences were found with regard to the type of VDR activator agent used. There was no difference in serum levels of 25(OH)D and CRP among groups participating in the study.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference between CD8+/VDR, CD4+/VDR, and MONO/VDR levels in hemodialysis patients using calcitriol or paricalcitol, suggesting that both treatment agents may have a similar effect on VDR contents in lymphocytes and monocytes in that patient population. But in all hemodialysis subgroups, CD8+/VDR, CD4+/VDR, and MONO/VDR levels were found to be higher compared with the healthy control subjects, suggesting an overexpression of VDR through a non CRP and/or 25(OH)D dependent mechanism.