• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据莫兹利分期模型,电休克疗法对“治疗抵抗性较低”抑郁症患者的疗效。

Effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with "less treatment-resistant" depression by the Maudsley Staging Model.

作者信息

Ma Yarong, Rosenheck Robert, Ye Biyu, Fan Ni, He Hongbo

机构信息

Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), Guangzhou, China.

Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Brain Behav. 2020 Jul;10(7):e01654. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1654. Epub 2020 May 13.

DOI:10.1002/brb3.1654
PMID:32406210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7375087/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for patients with mood disorders and is most often used for treatment-resistant cases. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of ECT in a real-world treatment sample in a Chinese psychiatric hospital which included both treatment-resistant and nontreatment-resistant patients.

METHODS

An observational study of symptom outcomes from admission to the time of discharge was conducted with 37 inpatients diagnosed with unipolar or bipolar depression treated with ECT. Symptom severity was assessed with the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression (HRSD-17) and treatment-resistance with the Maudsley Staging Model (MSM). Stratifying at the MSM median admission characteristics and symptom change was compared between patients who were treatment-resistant (n = 18) and who were not (n = 19). The outcome difference between groups was compared using analyses of covariance adjusted for baseline characteristics including symptom severity, followed by linear regression to identify factors associated symptom improvement in the entire sample.

RESULTS

The sample (n = 37) showed moderate treatment-resistance (MSM = 7.30 ± 1.13) at admission and both groups received 8.3 ± 2 ECT sessions. The treatment-resistant group had a smaller proportion of bipolar patients and more severe symptoms, but showed no significant difference from the nontreatment-resistant group in HDRS-17 scores at the time of discharge (adjusted means = 6.23 ± 1.00 vs. 5.94 ± 0.97, Partial η  = 0.001, p = .845). Baseline symptom severity was the strongest correlate of reduction in HDRS-17 scores (β = 0.891, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Symptom change with ECT in depression did not differ by level of treatment-resistance but was greatest among those with more severe baseline symptoms. Correlates of ECT effectiveness should be further evaluated in stratified randomized trials.

摘要

引言

电休克治疗(ECT)是治疗情绪障碍患者的一种有效方法,最常用于难治性病例。本研究旨在检验ECT在中国一家精神病医院的真实世界治疗样本中的有效性,该样本包括难治性和非难治性患者。

方法

对37例接受ECT治疗的诊断为单相或双相抑郁症的住院患者进行了一项从入院到出院的症状转归观察性研究。使用17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HRSD - 17)评估症状严重程度,使用莫兹利分期模型(MSM)评估治疗抵抗性。以MSM中位数入院特征进行分层,比较难治性患者(n = 18)和非难治性患者(n = 19)之间的症状变化。使用协方差分析比较两组间的结局差异,并对包括症状严重程度在内的基线特征进行调整,随后进行线性回归以确定整个样本中与症状改善相关的因素。

结果

样本(n = 37)入院时显示出中度治疗抵抗性(MSM = 7.30 ± 1.13),两组均接受了8.3 ± 2次ECT治疗。难治性组双相情感障碍患者比例较小且症状更严重,但出院时在HDRS - 17评分上与非难治性组无显著差异(调整后均值 = 6.23 ± 1.00 vs. 5.94 ± 0.97,偏η² = 0.001,p = 0.845)。基线症状严重程度是HDRS - 17评分降低的最强相关因素(β = 0.891,p < 0.001)。

结论

ECT治疗抑郁症时症状变化不因治疗抵抗程度而异,但在基线症状更严重的患者中变化最大。ECT有效性的相关因素应在分层随机试验中进一步评估。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with "less treatment-resistant" depression by the Maudsley Staging Model.根据莫兹利分期模型,电休克疗法对“治疗抵抗性较低”抑郁症患者的疗效。
Brain Behav. 2020 Jul;10(7):e01654. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1654. Epub 2020 May 13.
2
Negative cognitive schema modification as mediator of symptom improvement after electroconvulsive therapy in major depressive disorder.消极认知模式修正作为电抽搐治疗对重度抑郁症症状改善的中介。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Aug 1;310:156-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.088. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
3
The Maudsley Staging Method as predictor of electroconvulsive therapy effectiveness in depression.Maudsley 分期法预测抑郁症电抽搐治疗的效果。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Dec;138(6):605-614. doi: 10.1111/acps.12962. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
4
Depressive Symptom Dimensions in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression and Their Modulation With Electroconvulsive Therapy.治疗抵抗性重性抑郁障碍中的抑郁症状维度及其与电抽搐治疗的调节作用。
J ECT. 2020 Jun;36(2):123-129. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000623.
5
The clinical effectiveness and cost of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus electroconvulsive therapy in severe depression: a multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled trial and economic analysis.重复经颅磁刺激与电休克治疗重度抑郁症的临床疗效及成本:一项多中心实用随机对照试验及经济分析
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Jul;11(24):1-54. doi: 10.3310/hta11240.
6
Comparison of the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) plus agomelatine to ECT plus placebo in treatment-resistant depression.比较电抽搐治疗 (ECT) 联合阿戈美拉汀与 ECT 联合安慰剂治疗难治性抑郁症的疗效。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Aug;142(2):121-131. doi: 10.1111/acps.13183. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
7
Depression severity in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) versus pharmacotherapy trials.电休克治疗(ECT)与药物治疗试验中的抑郁严重程度。
J ECT. 2015 Mar;31(1):31-3. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000135.
8
Treatment-resistant bipolar depression: a randomized controlled trial of electroconvulsive therapy versus algorithm-based pharmacological treatment.治疗抵抗性双相抑郁:电抽搐治疗与基于算法的药物治疗的随机对照试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;172(1):41-51. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13111517. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
9
Clinical factors related to acute electroconvulsive therapy outcome for patients with major depressive disorder.与重度抑郁症患者急性电休克治疗结果相关的临床因素。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017 May;32(3):127-134. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000167.
10
Mood and neuropsychological effects of different doses of ketamine in electroconvulsive therapy for treatment-resistant depression.不同剂量氯胺酮在电休克治疗难治性抑郁症中的情绪和神经心理学效应
J Affect Disord. 2016 Sep 1;201:124-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Rationale and design of a double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trial of 40 Hz light neurostimulation therapy for depression (FELIX).背景与设计:一项 40Hz 光神经刺激疗法治疗抑郁症的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验(FELIX)。
Ann Med. 2024 May 11;56(1):2354852. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2354852. Epub 2024 May 20.
2
Looking through the lens of stigma: Understanding and anticipating concerns about the responsible development and use of psychiatric electroceutical interventions (PEIs).透过污名的视角:理解并预见对精神科电治疗干预措施(PEIs)的负责任开发与使用的担忧。
SSM Ment Health. 2023 Dec 15;4. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2023.100261. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
3
Baseline levels of miR-223-3p correlate with the effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with major depression.miR-223-3p 的基线水平与电抽搐治疗对重度抑郁症患者的疗效相关。
Transl Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 13;13(1):294. doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02582-4.
4
Factors associated with antidepressant responses to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in antidepressant-resistant depression.难治性抑郁症中与重复经颅磁刺激抗抑郁反应相关的因素。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Dec 2;16:1046920. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1046920. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Rates and Patient Characteristics of Electroconvulsive Therapy in China and Comparisons With the United States.中国电抽搐治疗的比率和患者特征及其与美国的比较。
J ECT. 2019 Dec;35(4):251-257. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000589.
2
'Treatment resistance' in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) patients: time to move on.电休克治疗(ECT)患者中的“治疗抵抗”:是时候采取新举措了。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2019 Nov;140(5):490-491. doi: 10.1111/acps.13091.
3
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-surgical brain stimulation for the acute treatment of major depressive episodes in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis.非手术性脑刺激治疗成人重度抑郁发作急性期的疗效和可接受性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Mar 27;364:l1079. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1079.
4
Electroconvulsive therapy: lack of studies is not the same as lack of effect.电休克治疗:缺乏研究并不等同于没有效果。
BMJ. 2019 Feb 25;364:l834. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l834.
5
Current and Common Definitions of Treatment-Resistant Depression: Findings from a Systematic Review and Qualitative Interviews.目前和常见的治疗抵抗性抑郁症定义:系统评价和定性访谈的结果。
Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;64(6):380-387. doi: 10.1177/0706743719828965. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
6
Electroconvulsive therapy: 80 years old and still going strong.电休克治疗:80岁高龄且依然强劲。
World J Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 4;9(1):1-6. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v9.i1.1.
7
Should we stop using electroconvulsive therapy?我们应该停止使用电休克疗法吗?
BMJ. 2019 Jan 9;364:k5233. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5233.
8
Neurological Devices; Reclassification of Electroconvulsive Therapy Devices; Effective Date of Requirement for Premarket Approval for Electroconvulsive Therapy Devices for Certain Specified Intended Uses. Final order.神经学设备;电休克治疗设备的重新分类;特定预期用途的电休克治疗设备上市前批准要求的生效日期。最终命令。
Fed Regist. 2018 Dec 26;83(246):66103-24.
9
The Maudsley Staging Method as predictor of electroconvulsive therapy effectiveness in depression.Maudsley 分期法预测抑郁症电抽搐治疗的效果。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Dec;138(6):605-614. doi: 10.1111/acps.12962. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
10
Empirical evidence for definitions of episode, remission, recovery, relapse and recurrence in depression: a systematic review.抑郁症发作、缓解、康复、复发和重现的定义的实证证据:系统评价。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Oct;28(5):544-562. doi: 10.1017/S2045796018000227. Epub 2018 May 17.