Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Nov 1;112(11):1089-1097. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa071.
Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors + endocrine therapy (ET) prolonged progression-free survival as first- or second-line therapy for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer prognosis. Given the recent publication of overall survival (OS) data for the 3 CDK4/6-inhibitors, we performed a meta-analysis to identify a more precise and reliable benefit from such treatments in specific clinical subgroups.
We conducted a systematic literature search to select all available phase II or III randomized clinical trials of CDK4/6-inhibitors + ET reporting OS data in first- or second-line therapy of HR+/HER2-negative pre- or postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer. A random effect model was applied for the analyses. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2statistic. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore the effect of study-level factors. The project was registered in the Open Science Framework database (doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/TNZQP).
Six studies were included in our analyses (3421 patients). A clear OS benefit was observed in patients without (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.54 to 0.85, I2 = 0.0%) and with visceral involvement (HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.89, I2 = 0.0%), with at least 3 metastatic sites (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.94, I2 = 11.6%), in an endocrine-resistant (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.93, I2 = 0.0%) and sensitive subset (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.88, I2 = 0.0%), for younger than 65 years (HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.95, I2 = 0.0%) and 65 years or older (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.95, I2 = 44.4%), in postmenopausal (HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.86, I2 = 0.0%) and pre- or perimenopausal setting (HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.96, I2 = 0.0%) as well as in chemotherapy-naïve patients (HR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.93, I2 = 0.0%).
CDK4/6-inhibitors + ET combinations compared with ET alone improve OS independent of age, menopausal status, endocrine sensitiveness, and visceral involvement and should be preferred as upfront therapy instead of endocrine monotherapy.
细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶 4 和 6(CDK4/6)抑制剂联合内分泌治疗(ET)作为激素受体阳性(HR+)/HER2 阴性转移性乳腺癌的一线或二线治疗方法,延长了无进展生存期。鉴于最近发表了 CDK4/6 抑制剂的总生存期(OS)数据,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定这些治疗方法在特定临床亚组中更精确和可靠的获益。
我们进行了系统的文献检索,以选择所有可用的 CDK4/6 抑制剂联合 ET 的 II 期或 III 期随机临床试验,这些试验报告了 HR+/HER2 阴性绝经前或绝经后转移性乳腺癌一线或二线治疗的 OS 数据。采用随机效应模型进行分析。用 I2 统计量评估异质性。进行亚组分析以探讨研究水平因素的影响。该项目已在开放科学框架数据库(doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/TNZQP)中注册。
我们的分析纳入了 6 项研究(3421 名患者)。在无内脏转移(风险比 [HR] = 0.68,95%置信区间 [CI] = 0.54 至 0.85,I2 = 0.0%)和有内脏转移(HR = 0.76,95% CI = 0.65 至 0.89,I2 = 0.0%)、至少有 3 个转移部位(HR = 0.75,95% CI = 0.60 至 0.94,I2 = 11.6%)、内分泌抵抗(HR = 0.79,95% CI = 0.67 至 0.93,I2 = 0.0%)和敏感亚组(HR = 0.73,95% CI = 0.61 至 0.88,I2 = 0.0%)的患者中,观察到明显的 OS 获益,无内脏转移(HR = 0.68,95% CI = 0.54 至 0.85,I2 = 0.0%)和有内脏转移(HR = 0.76,95% CI = 0.65 至 0.89,I2 = 0.0%)、年龄小于 65 岁(HR = 0.80,95% CI = 0.67 至 0.95,I2 = 0.0%)和 65 岁及以上(HR = 0.71,95% CI = 0.53 至 0.95,I2 = 44.4%)、绝经后(HR = 0.76,95% CI = 0.67 至 0.86,I2 = 0.0%)和绝经前或围绝经期(HR = 0.76,95% CI = 0.60 至 0.96,I2 = 0.0%)以及化疗初治患者(HR = 0.72,95% CI = 0.55 至 0.93,I2 = 0.0%)中,CDK4/6 抑制剂联合 ET 组与 ET 单药组相比,OS 得到改善,与年龄、绝经状态、内分泌敏感性和内脏转移无关,并且应该作为一线治疗而不是内分泌单药治疗。