Suppr超能文献

CDK4/6抑制剂在激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性转移性乳腺癌中的成本效益:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Masurkar Prajakta P, Prajapati Prachi, Canedo Joanne, Goswami Swarnali, Earl Sally, Bhattacharya Kaustuv

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Now with Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2024 Oct;40(10):1753-1767. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2402074. Epub 2024 Sep 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors have emerged as a significant advancement in the treatment of HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Despite the clinical efficacy of CDK 4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, there remains a significant gap in understanding their cost-effectiveness, particularly regarding the long-term economic impact and the key drivers of costs, when used in combination with endocrine therapy. This study aims to systematically review and conduct a meta-analysis of cost-effectiveness studies evaluating CDK4/6 inhibitors in treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer and identify key drivers of costs of CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase was conducted to identify peer-reviewed studies from February 2015 to March 2022 reporting cost-effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors in MBC treatment. Incremental net benefits (INBs) were estimated, and meta-analysis was conducted. This review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

We identified 120 articles, of which 18 were eligible for systematic review and 16 for meta-analysis. None of the three CDK4/6 inhibitors had positive INB compared to endocrine/aromatase inhibitors therapy alone. The pooled INB was estimated at -$149,266.87 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) = -$196,961.54, -$101,572.20).

CONCLUSION

The combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors and letrozole/endocrine therapy for the treatment of postmenopausal patients with advanced HR+/HER2 - MBC was not cost-effective.

摘要

背景

细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6(CDK 4/6)抑制剂已成为激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HR+/HER2-)转移性乳腺癌(MBC)治疗的一项重大进展。尽管CDK 4/6抑制剂在HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌的临床治疗中具有疗效,但在理解其成本效益方面仍存在显著差距,特别是在与内分泌治疗联合使用时的长期经济影响和成本的关键驱动因素。本研究旨在系统回顾并对评估CDK4/6抑制剂治疗HR+/HER2-晚期乳腺癌的成本效益研究进行荟萃分析,并确定CDK4/6抑制剂与内分泌治疗联合使用时成本的关键驱动因素。

方法

对PubMed和Embase进行全面检索,以确定2015年2月至2022年3月间报道CDK4/6抑制剂在MBC治疗中成本效益的同行评审研究。估计增量净效益(INB),并进行荟萃分析。本综述遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。

结果

我们确定了120篇文章,其中18篇符合系统评价的条件,16篇符合荟萃分析的条件。与单独使用内分泌/芳香化酶抑制剂治疗相比,三种CDK4/6抑制剂均未显示出正的INB。汇总的INB估计为-149,266.87美元(95%置信区间(CI)=-196,961.54美元,-101,572.20美元)。

结论

CDK4/6抑制剂与来曲唑/内分泌治疗联合用于治疗绝经后晚期HR+/HER2- MBC患者不具有成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验