Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Dec;110(6):2013-2019. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.03.107. Epub 2020 May 11.
Extraanatomic retrosternal and presternal esophageal reconstruction performed after esophagectomy poses a significant technical challenge to those patients who require cardiac surgery. This study reviewed a single-center experience with cardiac surgical procedures in patients with extraanatomic esophageal conduits, to examine the relative advantages of median sternotomy and thoracotomy approaches.
This case series identified patients who underwent cardiac surgery after extraanatomic esophageal reconstruction between January 1, 1999 and October 1, 2019 at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, surgical indications, characteristics, and outcomes. Continuous variables were reported as the mean or as the median and range, as appropriate.
Seven individual patients had 8 cardiac surgical procedures after extraanatomic esophageal reconstruction (5 retrosternal, 2 presternal). All were male, with a median age of 65.5 years (range, 51 to 71 years). Preoperative computed tomography was obtained in all but 1 patient. Median sternotomy was performed in 4 patients, left thoracotomy in 2, right thoracotomy in 1, and right anterior thoracotomy in 1. Median bypass time was 91 minutes (interquartile range, 113.5 minutes). The median cross-clamp time was 57.5 minutes (interquartile range, 27.0 minutes). There was 1 delayed injury to a retrosternal conduit after median sternotomy approach. There were no injuries to the blood supply of any conduit. In-hospital mortality was 0%. The median length of stay was 7.5 days (range, 5 to 34 days).
Different cardiac surgical procedures can be performed safely in patients with extraanatomic esophageal reconstructions through median sternotomy or thoracotomy. Preoperative planning with computed tomography with intravenous contrast enhancement of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis is essential for individualization of the surgical approach.
在接受食管癌切除术的患者中进行解剖外胸骨后和胸骨前食管重建对需要心脏手术的患者来说是一项重大技术挑战。本研究回顾了单中心在解剖外食管导管患者中进行心脏手术的经验,以检查正中开胸术和开胸术的相对优势。
本病例系列研究确定了 1999 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 10 月 1 日期间在明尼苏达州罗切斯特市梅奥诊所接受解剖外食管重建后进行心脏手术的患者。电子病历记录了患者的人口统计学、手术适应证、特征和结果。连续变量以平均值或中位数和范围报告,视情况而定。
7 名患者中有 8 名患者在解剖外食管重建后接受了心脏手术(5 例胸骨后,2 例胸骨前)。所有患者均为男性,中位年龄为 65.5 岁(范围,51 至 71 岁)。除 1 例患者外,所有患者均行术前计算机断层扫描。4 例患者行正中开胸术,2 例患者行左开胸术,1 例患者行右开胸术,1 例患者行右前开胸术。中位体外循环时间为 91 分钟(四分位距,113.5 分钟)。中位阻断时间为 57.5 分钟(四分位距,27.0 分钟)。1 例患者在正中开胸术途径后出现胸骨后导管延迟损伤。无导管血供损伤。院内死亡率为 0%。中位住院时间为 7.5 天(范围,5 至 34 天)。
通过正中开胸术或开胸术可以安全地对解剖外食管重建患者进行不同的心脏手术。术前计划应包括胸部、腹部和骨盆的静脉对比增强计算机断层扫描,以实现个体化手术入路。