Suppr超能文献

四度产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)后后续妊娠的管理

Management of subsequent pregnancies following fourth-degree obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

作者信息

Taithongchai Annika, Thakar Ranee, Sultan Abdul H

机构信息

Croydon University Hospital, 530 London Road, CR5 7YE, London, United Kingdom.

Croydon University Hospital, 530 London Road, CR5 7YE, London, United Kingdom; Honorary Reader at St George's University of London.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Jul;250:80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.04.063. Epub 2020 May 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The management of subsequent pregnancy in women who sustained OASIS remains an enigma. Nearly all studies include all grades of OASIS including fourth-degree tears. In addition, most protocols require endoanal ultrasound and anal manometric assessment to provide advice regarding mode of delivery. In reality, most women who sustain an OASI do not undergo these investigations. The aims of our study were firstly to evaluate outcomes of fourth-degree OASIS in terms of sphincter defects, anal manometry and anal incontinence symptoms. Secondly, we wished to review recommendations made regarding subsequent mode of delivery after fourth-degree OASIS according to different published protocols.

STUDY DESIGN

An observational study of all women who had undergone a primary repair of a fourth-degree tear and seen in the perineal clinic of a tertiary urogynaecology unit between January 2006 and December 2017. Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound and anal manometry were performed on all women, and symptoms assessed using the validated modified St Mark's Score for anal incontinence. Diagnostic test accuracy analysis was performed for use of symptoms in predicting abnormal investigations.

RESULTS

74 fourth-degree tears were identified (mean follow-up 5.9 months; SD 11.5). Endoanal scan showed an internal anal sphincter defect in 77 % and an external anal sphincter defect in 49 %. Only 18 % had no defect. The mean incremental pressure rise was 12.6 mmHg (SD 15.5). 61 % were asymptomatic with a mean St Mark's Score of 3.8 (SD 5.4). The presence of symptoms alone had poor accuracy in predicting abnormal investigations. Based on Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidance, only 7% would not be offered a caesarean section as they are asymptomatic women with normal scan and manometry findings and would be counselled for a vaginal delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Given that only a few units offer these specialist investigations to their OASI population, it would be reasonable to offer caesarean section to all women who have sustained a fourth-degree tear. However, in centres where endoanal ultrasound and anal manometry are available, individualised counselling can be offered.

摘要

目的

对于发生产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)的女性,其后续妊娠的管理仍是个谜。几乎所有研究都纳入了所有等级的OASIS,包括四度撕裂。此外,大多数方案要求进行肛门内超声检查和肛门测压评估,以提供有关分娩方式的建议。实际上,大多数发生OASI的女性并未接受这些检查。我们研究的目的,首先是根据括约肌缺陷、肛门测压和肛门失禁症状来评估四度OASIS的结局。其次,我们希望根据不同的已发表方案,回顾关于四度OASIS后后续分娩方式的建议。

研究设计

对2006年1月至2017年12月期间在一家三级泌尿妇科单位的会阴诊所接受四度撕裂一期修复的所有女性进行观察性研究。对所有女性进行三维肛门内超声检查和肛门测压,并使用经过验证的改良圣马克肛门失禁评分对症状进行评估。对症状在预测异常检查中的应用进行诊断试验准确性分析。

结果

共识别出74例四度撕裂(平均随访5.9个月;标准差11.5)。肛门内扫描显示,77%的患者存在肛门内括约肌缺陷,49%的患者存在肛门外括约肌缺陷。只有18%没有缺陷。平均压力增量上升为12.6 mmHg(标准差15.5)。61%的患者无症状,平均圣马克评分为3.8(标准差5.4)。仅症状的存在在预测异常检查方面准确性较差。根据皇家妇产科学院的指导,只有7%的患者不会被建议剖宫产,因为她们是无症状的女性,扫描和测压结果正常,将接受阴道分娩咨询。

结论

鉴于只有少数单位为其OASI人群提供这些专科检查,对所有发生四度撕裂的女性建议剖宫产是合理的。然而,在可进行肛门内超声检查和肛门测压的中心,可以提供个性化咨询。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验