Raper Daniel M S, Rutledge Caleb, Winkler Ethan A, Abla Adib A
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020 Sep 15;19(4):393-402. doi: 10.1093/ons/opaa103.
The extent of obliteration of ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with coil embolization has been correlated with the risk of rerupture. However, many practitioners consider that a small neck remnant is unlikely to result in significant risk after coiling.
To report our recent experience with ruptured anterior cerebral artery aneurysms treated with endovascular coiling, which recurred or reruptured, requiring microsurgical clipping for subsequent treatment.
Retrospective review of patients with intracranial aneurysms treated at our institution since August 2018. Patient and aneurysm characteristics, initial and subsequent treatment approaches, and outcomes were reviewed.
Six patients were included. Out of those 6 patients, 5 patients had anterior communicating artery aneurysms, and 1 patient had a pericallosal aneurysm. All initially presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and were treated with coiling. Recurrence occurred at a median of 7.5 mo. In 2 cases, retreatment was initially performed with repeat endovascular coiling, but further recurrence was observed. Rerupture from the residual or recurrent aneurysm occurred in 3 cases. In 2 cases, the aneurysm dome recurred; in 1 case, rerupture occurred from the neck. All 6 patients underwent treatment with microsurgical clipping. Follow-up catheter angiography demonstrated a complete occlusion of the aneurysm in all cases with the preservation of the parent vessel.
Anterior cerebral artery aneurysms may recur after endovascular treatment, and even small neck remnants present a risk of rerupture after an initial SAH. Complete treatment requires a complete exclusion of the aneurysm from the circulation. Even in cases that have been previously coiled, microsurgical clipping can represent a safe and effective treatment option.
采用弹簧圈栓塞治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤的闭塞程度与再破裂风险相关。然而,许多从业者认为,较小的瘤颈残余在弹簧圈栓塞后不太可能导致显著风险。
报告我们近期对破裂大脑前动脉动脉瘤采用血管内弹簧圈栓塞治疗后复发或再破裂,随后需要显微手术夹闭治疗的经验。
回顾性分析自2018年8月以来在我院接受治疗的颅内动脉瘤患者。对患者和动脉瘤的特征、初始及后续治疗方法以及治疗结果进行回顾。
纳入6例患者。在这6例患者中,5例为前交通动脉瘤,1例为胼周动脉瘤。所有患者最初均表现为蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)并接受了弹簧圈栓塞治疗。复发发生的中位时间为7.5个月。2例患者最初再次进行了血管内弹簧圈栓塞治疗,但观察到进一步复发。3例患者出现残余或复发性动脉瘤再破裂。2例患者动脉瘤瘤顶复发;1例患者瘤颈处发生再破裂。所有6例患者均接受了显微手术夹闭治疗。随访导管血管造影显示所有病例动脉瘤均完全闭塞,且载瘤血管得以保留。
大脑前动脉动脉瘤血管内治疗后可能复发,即使是较小的瘤颈残余在初次SAH后也存在再破裂风险。彻底治疗需要将动脉瘤完全排除在血液循环之外。即使是先前已进行弹簧圈栓塞的病例,显微手术夹闭也可能是一种安全有效的治疗选择。