Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA; Precision Neuro-therapeutics Innovation Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA; Neurosurgery Simulation and Innovation Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA; Precision Neuro-therapeutics Innovation Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA; Neurosurgery Simulation and Innovation Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2022 May;161:153. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 May 14.
Endovascular treatment modalities for intracranial aneurysms have seen a significant increase in popularity since the initial advent of the Guglielmi detachable coils in the early nineties. The publication of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) in addition to significant improvement in catheter and coil technology further cemented the endovascular-first approach, specifically for ruptured aneurysms. However, the increase in aneurysm coiling also led to a heightened awareness of its shortcomings, namely a significantly greater rate of recurrence and need for retreatment. The Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study revealed that even though the rate of rerupture is low with both microsurgical and endovascular treatment modalities, the rate of rerupture is greater with incomplete versus complete aneurysm occlusion. Previously coiled aneurysms can be challenging to treat. While in some cases further endovascular therapies can be performed, microsurgical clipping remains a compelling alternative, specifically for small recurrent or residual ruptured aneurysms. However, microsurgical clipping of previously coiled aneurysms presents its own set of unique challenges. The presence of coils in the aneurysms increases the complexity of clip reconstruction. In addition, coil extrusion, which is often misdiagnosed as coil compaction on diagnostic imaging and therefore underreported, can further increase the risk of microsurgical dissection. In this operative video, we present a case of a postcoiling, residual or recurrent, ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm successfully treated through microsurgical clipping. The patient consented to the procedure as shown in this operative video (Video 1) and gave informed written consent for use of her images in publication.
自 90 年代初首次使用可解脱弹簧圈治疗颅内动脉瘤以来,血管内治疗方法的应用显著增加。国际蛛网膜下腔出血试验(ISAT)的发表以及导管和线圈技术的显著改进进一步巩固了血管内优先治疗的方法,特别是对于破裂的动脉瘤。然而,动脉瘤线圈栓塞数量的增加也使人们更加意识到其缺点,即复发率和再治疗需求明显增加。颅内动脉瘤治疗后再破裂(CARAT)研究表明,尽管血管内和显微手术治疗方法的再破裂率都较低,但不完全闭塞与完全闭塞的动脉瘤相比,再破裂率更高。以前接受过线圈栓塞的动脉瘤治疗具有挑战性。虽然在某些情况下可以进行进一步的血管内治疗,但显微手术夹闭仍然是一种可行的替代方法,特别是对于小型复发性或残留破裂的动脉瘤。然而,对以前接受过线圈栓塞的动脉瘤进行显微手术夹闭存在一系列独特的挑战。动脉瘤内的线圈增加了夹闭重建的复杂性。此外,线圈突出,常被误诊为诊断影像学上的线圈压实,因此报告不足,但会进一步增加显微手术分离的风险。在这个手术视频中,我们展示了一例通过显微手术夹闭成功治疗的后线圈栓塞、残留或复发性破裂前交通动脉瘤的病例。患者同意进行该手术(视频 1),并签署了知情同意书,同意将其图像用于出版。