• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

培哚普利治疗原发性高血压患者的疗效与安全性

Efficacy and Safety of Perindopril in Patients with Essential Hypertension.

作者信息

Hodzic Enisa, Pecar Ehlimana, Dzubur Alen, Smajic Elnur, Hondo Zorica, Delic Daniela, Rustempasic Edhem

机构信息

Clinical Center University of Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Health Center of Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina.

出版信息

Mater Sociomed. 2020 Mar;32(1):4-9. doi: 10.5455/msm.2020.32.4-9.

DOI:10.5455/msm.2020.32.4-9
PMID:32410885
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7219713/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Perindopril is a tissue-specific ACE inhibitor with 24 hours long blood pressure-lowering effect, which protects blood vessels and decreases the variability of blood pressure.

AIM

The aim of our study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of perindopril in newly diagnosed or previously treated but uncontrolled adult hypertensive patients.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included primary care patients with essential hypertension. Primary study outcomes were decreasing arterial blood pressure to normal levels (<140/90 mmHg), reducing systolic arterial blood pressure for 10 mmHg or more and reducing diastolic arterial blood pressure for 5 mmHg or more. Safety was evaluated by type and frequency of adverse events.

RESULTS

In the great majority of the study patients (more than 96%) perindopril was effective as monotherapy, achieving a significant reduction in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and in three-quarters of the study patients it normalized both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The effectiveness of perindopril was shown in both patients with previously and newly diagnosed hypertension, adverse events were mild and rare, even hyperkalemia was encountered less often than before the onset of the therapy with perindopril.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed excellent effectiveness of perindopril in the treatment of essential hypertension and its remarkable safety. When used as monotherapy of hypertension, perindopril's doses should be carefully titrated until the achievement of full effect, which in some patients should be awaited for at least 6 months from onset of the therapy.

摘要

引言

培哚普利是一种组织特异性血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂,具有长达24小时的降压作用,可保护血管并降低血压变异性。

目的

我们研究的目的是调查培哚普利在新诊断或既往接受治疗但血压控制不佳的成年高血压患者中的有效性和安全性。

方法

这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了原发性高血压的初级保健患者。主要研究结局为将动脉血压降至正常水平(<140/90 mmHg)、收缩压降低10 mmHg或更多以及舒张压降低5 mmHg或更多。通过不良事件的类型和频率评估安全性。

结果

在绝大多数研究患者(超过96%)中,培哚普利作为单一疗法有效,收缩压和舒张压均显著降低,四分之三的研究患者收缩压和舒张压均恢复正常。培哚普利在既往诊断和新诊断的高血压患者中均显示出有效性,不良事件轻微且罕见,甚至高钾血症的发生率也低于开始使用培哚普利治疗前。

结论

我们的研究证实了培哚普利治疗原发性高血压的卓越有效性及其显著的安全性。当作为高血压单一疗法使用时,培哚普利的剂量应仔细滴定,直至达到完全疗效,在某些患者中,这可能需要从治疗开始等待至少6个月。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/030b/7219713/1286b5da0e13/MSM-32-4-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/030b/7219713/1286b5da0e13/MSM-32-4-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/030b/7219713/1286b5da0e13/MSM-32-4-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Perindopril in Patients with Essential Hypertension.培哚普利治疗原发性高血压患者的疗效与安全性
Mater Sociomed. 2020 Mar;32(1):4-9. doi: 10.5455/msm.2020.32.4-9.
2
Antihypertensive efficacy of perindopril 5-10 mg/day in primary health care: an open-label, prospective, observational study.培哚普利 5-10 毫克/天在基层医疗中的降压疗效:一项开放标签、前瞻性、观察性研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 2009;29(12):767-76. doi: 10.2165/11319700-000000000-00000.
3
Blood pressure-lowering efficacy and safety of perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine single-pill combination in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.培哚普利/吲达帕胺/氨氯地平单片复方制剂治疗血压控制不佳的原发性高血压患者的降压疗效及安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、对照试验
J Hypertens. 2017 Jul;35(7):1481-1495. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001359.
4
Management of hypertension with the fixed combination of perindopril and amlodipine in daily clinical practice: results from the STRONG prospective, observational, multicenter study.培哚普利与氨氯地平固定复方在日常临床实践中治疗高血压:STRONG前瞻性、观察性、多中心研究结果
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2009;9(3):135-42. doi: 10.1007/BF03256570.
5
Efficacy and tolerability of the perindopril/indapamide combination therapy for hypertension: the PRIMUS study.培哚普利/吲达帕胺联合治疗高血压的疗效和耐受性:PRIMUS研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Sep;22(9):1849-58. doi: 10.1185/030079906X132433.
6
Optimization of blood pressure treatment with fixed-combination perindopril/amlodipine in patients with arterial hypertension.优化固定复方制剂培哚普利/氨氯地平治疗动脉高血压患者的血压。
Clin Drug Investig. 2012 Sep 1;32(9):603-12. doi: 10.1007/BF03261915.
7
Assessment of perindopril's efficacy on arterial distensibility in mild to moderate hypertension.培哚普利对轻至中度高血压患者动脉扩张性疗效的评估。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2001 Jul;84(7):1006-14.
8
Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure reduction with a perindopril/amlodipine fixed-dose combination.培哚普利/氨氯地平固定剂量复方制剂 24 小时降压。
Clin Drug Investig. 2013 Jul;33(7):469-76. doi: 10.1007/s40261-013-0086-9.
9
Perindopril/hydrochlorothiazide dose combinations for the treatment of hypertension: a multicenter study.培哚普利/氢氯噻嗪联合用药治疗高血压的剂量组合:一项多中心研究。
J Clin Pharmacol. 1997 Jan;37(1):47-52. doi: 10.1177/009127009703700108.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Perindopril Arginine/Amlodipine in Hypertensive Patients Not Adequately Controlled with Amlodipine 5 mg or Perindopril tert-Butylamine 4 mg Monotherapy.固定剂量培哚普利精氨酸盐/氨氯地平治疗单用5mg氨氯地平或4mg培哚普利叔丁胺未能充分控制血压的高血压患者的疗效与安全性
Cardiology. 2016;134(1):1-10. doi: 10.1159/000441348. Epub 2016 Jan 16.

本文引用的文献

1
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会动脉高血压管理指南。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019 Feb;72(2):160. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2018.12.004.
2
A systematic review of hypertension outcomes and treatment strategies in older adults.老年高血压结局与治疗策略的系统评价
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 Nov;73:160-168. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2017.07.018. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
3
The incidence of all-cause, cardiovascular and respiratory disease admission among 20,252 users of lisinopril vs. perindopril: A cohort study.
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 15;219:410-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.053. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
4
[Prevalence of true resistant hypertension among uncontrolled hypertensive patients referred to a tertiary health care center].[转诊至三级医疗保健中心的血压控制不佳的高血压患者中真性难治性高血压的患病率]
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2016 Jun;65(3):191-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 May 12.
5
The effectiveness of perindopril vs. lisinopril on reducing the incidence of diabetes and renal diseases: A cohort study of 20,252 patients.培哚普利与赖诺普利在降低糖尿病和肾脏疾病发病率方面的有效性:一项对20252名患者的队列研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2015;190:384-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.191. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
6
Blood pressure control and acceptability of perindopril and its fixed dose combinations with amlodipine or indapamide, in younger patients with hypertension.培哚普利及其与氨氯地平或吲达帕胺的固定剂量复方制剂在年轻高血压患者中的血压控制情况及可接受性
Indian Heart J. 2014 Nov-Dec;66(6):635-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2014.10.419. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
7
Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors versus angiotensin receptor blockers for primary hypertension.血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗原发性高血压的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 22;2014(8):CD009096. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009096.pub2.
8
Cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients newly prescribed perindopril vs. lisinopril: a 5-year cohort study of 15,622 Chinese subjects.新处方培哚普利与赖诺普利的高血压患者心血管死亡率:一项对15622名中国受试者的5年队列研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Oct 20;176(3):703-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.07.114. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
9
Perindopril for the treatment of hypertension.培哚普利治疗高血压。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011 Jul;12(10):1633-42. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2011.585460. Epub 2011 May 21.
10
Dose-dependent antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of perindopril in a large, observational, 12-week, general practice-based study.在一项大型、观察性、为期 12 周的基于一般实践的研究中,培哚普利具有剂量依赖性的降压疗效和耐受性。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2011;11(1):45-55. doi: 10.2165/11587000-000000000-00000.