Evoy Kirk E, Ford Kentya H, Nduaguba Sabina, Taylor Amber, Thomas Lindsay
College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States.
Department of Pharmacy, University Health System, San Antonio, Texas, United States.
Tob Prev Cessat. 2019 Nov 26;5:44. doi: 10.18332/tpc/113356. eCollection 2019.
Quit and Win programs (Q&W) have been shown to improve smoking cessation rates by offering potential rewards to encourage smoking cessation. However, few studies have combined Q&W with intensive smoking cessation programs including behavioral counseling and pharmacotherapy, or studied Q&W in underserved, minority populations. This study was conducted to assess the impact on smoking cessation rates of adding a Q&W to intensive smoking cessation therapy in a largely underserved, minority population.
This was a single-center, prospective, open-label controlled study. Current smokers received pharmacist-led behavioral counseling and smoking cessation pharmacotherapy. Intervention group patients who successfully quit (verified by self-report and exhaled carbon monoxide) at 1 month and 3 months post-quit date were entered into a draw for $1000. The control group received the same smoking cessation services, but without a monetary incentive.
Enrollment was 111 patients (N=85 in the intervention group), made up of predominantly underserved (82% had annual household income <$25000), minority (69.1%), and female (58%) patients. Groups were similar except the intervention group had lower educational and income levels, while the control group was more likely to smoke more than 1 pack per day. Quit rates at 3 months were 27% and 19% in the intervention and control groups, respectively (p=0.22). Female gender (OR=2.84; p=0.04) and Fagerström score (OR=0.71; p<0.01) were significant predictors of quitting.
The addition of Q&W to intensive smoking cessation services increased clinic referrals and numerically improved cessation rates, although this difference was not statistically significant, possibly due to high attrition of the study.
戒烟赢奖计划(Q&W)已被证明可通过提供潜在奖励来鼓励戒烟,从而提高戒烟成功率。然而,很少有研究将Q&W与包括行为咨询和药物治疗在内的强化戒烟计划相结合,或者在服务不足的少数族裔人群中研究Q&W。本研究旨在评估在主要为服务不足的少数族裔人群中,在强化戒烟治疗中加入Q&W对戒烟率的影响。
这是一项单中心、前瞻性、开放标签对照研究。当前吸烟者接受药剂师主导的行为咨询和戒烟药物治疗。干预组中在戒烟日期后1个月和3个月成功戒烟(通过自我报告和呼出一氧化碳验证)的患者可参加抽奖,奖金为1000美元。对照组接受相同的戒烟服务,但没有金钱激励。
共招募了111名患者(干预组85名),主要是服务不足的患者(82%家庭年收入低于25000美元)、少数族裔(69.1%)和女性患者(58%)。除干预组教育和收入水平较低,而对照组每天吸烟超过1包的可能性更大外,两组相似。干预组和对照组3个月时的戒烟率分别为27%和19%(p=0.22)。女性(OR=2.84;p=0.04)和法格斯特罗姆评分(OR=0.71;p<0.01)是戒烟的显著预测因素。
在强化戒烟服务中加入Q&W增加了门诊转诊人数,戒烟率在数值上有所提高,尽管这种差异无统计学意义,可能是由于研究中的高失访率。