• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项试点研究,评估在主要为服务不足的少数族裔人群中,在药剂师主导的强化戒烟治疗中加入“戒烟赢”计划的效果。

A pilot study assessing the addition of a Quit and Win program to pharmacist-led intensive smoking cessation therapy in a predominantly underserved, minority population.

作者信息

Evoy Kirk E, Ford Kentya H, Nduaguba Sabina, Taylor Amber, Thomas Lindsay

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States.

Department of Pharmacy, University Health System, San Antonio, Texas, United States.

出版信息

Tob Prev Cessat. 2019 Nov 26;5:44. doi: 10.18332/tpc/113356. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.18332/tpc/113356
PMID:32411906
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7205166/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Quit and Win programs (Q&W) have been shown to improve smoking cessation rates by offering potential rewards to encourage smoking cessation. However, few studies have combined Q&W with intensive smoking cessation programs including behavioral counseling and pharmacotherapy, or studied Q&W in underserved, minority populations. This study was conducted to assess the impact on smoking cessation rates of adding a Q&W to intensive smoking cessation therapy in a largely underserved, minority population.

METHODS

This was a single-center, prospective, open-label controlled study. Current smokers received pharmacist-led behavioral counseling and smoking cessation pharmacotherapy. Intervention group patients who successfully quit (verified by self-report and exhaled carbon monoxide) at 1 month and 3 months post-quit date were entered into a draw for $1000. The control group received the same smoking cessation services, but without a monetary incentive.

RESULTS

Enrollment was 111 patients (N=85 in the intervention group), made up of predominantly underserved (82% had annual household income <$25000), minority (69.1%), and female (58%) patients. Groups were similar except the intervention group had lower educational and income levels, while the control group was more likely to smoke more than 1 pack per day. Quit rates at 3 months were 27% and 19% in the intervention and control groups, respectively (p=0.22). Female gender (OR=2.84; p=0.04) and Fagerström score (OR=0.71; p<0.01) were significant predictors of quitting.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of Q&W to intensive smoking cessation services increased clinic referrals and numerically improved cessation rates, although this difference was not statistically significant, possibly due to high attrition of the study.

摘要

引言

戒烟赢奖计划(Q&W)已被证明可通过提供潜在奖励来鼓励戒烟,从而提高戒烟成功率。然而,很少有研究将Q&W与包括行为咨询和药物治疗在内的强化戒烟计划相结合,或者在服务不足的少数族裔人群中研究Q&W。本研究旨在评估在主要为服务不足的少数族裔人群中,在强化戒烟治疗中加入Q&W对戒烟率的影响。

方法

这是一项单中心、前瞻性、开放标签对照研究。当前吸烟者接受药剂师主导的行为咨询和戒烟药物治疗。干预组中在戒烟日期后1个月和3个月成功戒烟(通过自我报告和呼出一氧化碳验证)的患者可参加抽奖,奖金为1000美元。对照组接受相同的戒烟服务,但没有金钱激励。

结果

共招募了111名患者(干预组85名),主要是服务不足的患者(82%家庭年收入低于25000美元)、少数族裔(69.1%)和女性患者(58%)。除干预组教育和收入水平较低,而对照组每天吸烟超过1包的可能性更大外,两组相似。干预组和对照组3个月时的戒烟率分别为27%和19%(p=0.22)。女性(OR=2.84;p=0.04)和法格斯特罗姆评分(OR=0.71;p<0.01)是戒烟的显著预测因素。

结论

在强化戒烟服务中加入Q&W增加了门诊转诊人数,戒烟率在数值上有所提高,尽管这种差异无统计学意义,可能是由于研究中的高失访率。

相似文献

1
A pilot study assessing the addition of a Quit and Win program to pharmacist-led intensive smoking cessation therapy in a predominantly underserved, minority population.一项试点研究,评估在主要为服务不足的少数族裔人群中,在药剂师主导的强化戒烟治疗中加入“戒烟赢”计划的效果。
Tob Prev Cessat. 2019 Nov 26;5:44. doi: 10.18332/tpc/113356. eCollection 2019.
2
Levels of exhaled carbon monoxide measured during an intervention program predict 1-year smoking cessation: a retrospective observational cohort study.干预计划期间测量的呼气一氧化碳水平可预测 1 年的戒烟率:一项回顾性观察队列研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Oct 16;27(1):59. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0060-8.
3
Smoke-Free Moms: Financial Rewards for Smoking Cessation by Low-Income Rural Pregnant Women.无烟妈妈:为农村低收入孕妇戒烟提供经济奖励。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Jun;56(6):852-859. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
4
Smoking quit rates among patients receiving pharmacist-provided pharmacotherapy and telephonic smoking cessation counseling.接受药剂师提供的药物治疗和电话戒烟咨询的患者的戒烟率。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2016 Mar-Apr;56(2):129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.02.001.
5
Paying Low-Income Smokers to Quit? The Cost-Effectiveness of Incentivizing Tobacco Quit Line Engagement for Medicaid Recipients Who Smoke.向低收入吸烟者付费以使其戒烟?为符合条件的 Medicaid 烟民提供激励以使其参与戒烟热线的成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2019 Feb;22(2):177-184. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
6
The effect of motivational lung age feedback on short-term quit rates in smokers seeking intensive group treatment: A randomized controlled pilot study.动机性肺龄反馈对寻求强化团体治疗的吸烟者短期戒烟率的影响:一项随机对照试验性研究。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Aug 1;153:271-7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 May 18.
7
Effectiveness of a pharmacist-delivered smoking cessation program in the State of Qatar: a randomized controlled trial.卡塔尔国由药剂师提供的戒烟项目的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Feb 20;17(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4103-4.
8
'Breathe': the stop smoking service for pregnant women in Glasgow.《呼吸》:格拉斯哥为孕妇提供的戒烟服务。
Midwifery. 2010 Jun;26(3):e1-e13. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
9
Effect of Intensive Personalized "5As+5Rs" Intervention on Smoking Cessation in Hospitalized Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Not Ready to Quit Immediately: A Randomized Controlled Trial.强化个性化“5As+5Rs”干预对非立即准备戒烟的住院急性冠状动脉综合征患者戒烟效果的随机对照试验
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Apr 2;20(5):596-605. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx126.
10
Feasibility and Quit Rates of the Tobacco Status Project: A Facebook Smoking Cessation Intervention for Young Adults.烟草状况项目的可行性及戒烟率:一项针对年轻人的脸书戒烟干预措施
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 31;17(12):e291. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5209.

引用本文的文献

1
Health behavior interventions among people with lower socio-economic position: a scoping review of behavior change techniques and effectiveness.社会经济地位较低人群的健康行为干预:行为改变技术与效果的范围综述
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2024 Jun 18;12(1):2365931. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2024.2365931. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of Pharmaceutical Smoking Cessation Aids in a Nationally Representative Cohort of American Smokers.医药戒烟辅助手段对美国代表性吸烟人群的戒烟效果。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Jun 1;110(6):581-587. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx240.
2
Current and Emerging Pharmacotherapies for Cessation of Tobacco Smoking.当前和新兴的戒烟药物治疗。
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Feb;38(2):235-258. doi: 10.1002/phar.2073. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
3
Potentially Preventable Deaths Among the Five Leading Causes of Death - United States, 2010 and 2014.五种主要死因中的可预防死亡人数 - 美国,2010 年和 2014 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Nov 18;65(45):1245-1255. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6545a1.
4
Medicaid Tobacco Cessation: Big Gaps Remain In Efforts To Get Smokers To Quit.医疗补助计划的戒烟举措:促使吸烟者戒烟的努力仍存在巨大差距。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jan;35(1):62-70. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0756.
5
Quit and Win contests for smoking cessation.戒烟“戒烟并赢”竞赛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8(4):CD004986. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004986.pub3.
6
A randomized controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation.一项关于戒烟经济激励措施的随机对照试验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jan;15(1):12-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0314.
7
Concurrent quit & win and nicotine replacement therapy voucher giveaway programs: participant characteristics and predictors of smoking abstinence.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2006 Jan-Feb;12(1):52-9. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200601000-00011.
8
Financial incentives to promote smoking cessation: evidence from 11 quit and win contests.促进戒烟的经济激励措施:来自11场戒烟竞赛的证据。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2006 Jan-Feb;12(1):44-51. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200601000-00010.
9
A controlled trial of a Quit and Win contest.
Am J Health Promot. 2005 Nov-Dec;20(2):117-26. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-20.2.117.
10
Effectiveness of a quit and win contest with a low-income population.针对低收入人群的戒烟竞赛的成效
Prev Med. 2004 Sep;39(3):543-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.02.012.