Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taiwan (Drs. Lo, Huang, Lin, and Hsieh); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan (Drs. Lo, Chen, and Lin); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Taiwan (Drs. Lo and Chen); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Taipei (Dr. Lo), Taiwan.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital of Singapore (Dr. Ng), Singapore.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Jan;28(1):107-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 May 13.
To determine the objective and subjective outcomes of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery using a modified Surelift system (Neomedic International, Barcelona, Spain) and to evaluate surgical complications and postoperative impact on quality of life (QOL) and lower urinary tract symptoms.
Retrospective cohort study.
Tertiary-care university hospital.
Patients with symptomatic anterior or apical POP stage III and above.
All patients underwent pelvic reconstructive surgery with a modified Surelift transvaginal mesh kit.
Eighty-three women who underwent pelvic reconstructive surgery with a modified Surelift for symptomatic anterior or apical prolapse stage III and above from April 2018 to January 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. All completed a 72-hour voiding diary, urodynamic study, and multiple validated QOL questionnaires at baseline and at between 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Descriptive statistics were used for demographics and perioperative data. Paired-samples t test and the McNemar test were applied for comparison of pre- and postoperative continuous and categoric data, respectively. The primary outcomes were the objective cure of POP, defined as anterior and apical prolapse Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System ≤ stage I, and subjective cure on the basis of negative answers to Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory 6. The objective and subjective cure rates at 1 year were 97.6% and 92.8%, respectively. There were significant improvements in QOL scores postoperatively. Although bladder outlet obstruction improved, de novo urodynamic stress incontinence and stress urinary incontinence were increased at 18.9% and 21.6%, respectively, at 1-year follow-up. The mesh extrusion rate was 4.8%.
A modified Surelift has good objective and subjective cure rates at 1 year postoperatively with 4.8% mesh extrusion rate. There was significant improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms and QOL. De novo urodynamic stress incontinence at 6 months to 12 months was increased, but it was not sufficiently bothersome to warrant surgery.
使用改良的 Surelift 系统(西班牙巴塞罗那 Neomedic 国际公司)评估盆腔器官脱垂(POP)手术的客观和主观结果,并评估手术并发症以及对生活质量(QOL)和下尿路症状的术后影响。
回顾性队列研究。
三级保健大学医院。
患有症状性前壁或顶壁 POP III 期及以上的患者。
所有患者均接受改良的 Surelift 经阴道网片套件的盆腔重建手术。
2018 年 4 月至 2019 年 1 月,对 83 名因症状性前壁或顶壁脱垂 III 期及以上而接受改良的 Surelift 盆腔重建手术的患者进行了回顾性分析。所有患者均在基线和术后 6-12 个月完成了 72 小时排尿日记、尿动力学研究和多个经过验证的 QOL 问卷。描述性统计用于人口统计学和围手术期数据。采用配对样本 t 检验和 McNemar 检验分别比较术前和术后连续和分类数据。主要结局是 POP 的客观治愈率,定义为前壁和顶壁盆腔器官脱垂定量系统≤I 期,以及基于盆腔器官脱垂困扰问卷 6 的阴性回答的主观治愈率。术后 1 年的客观和主观治愈率分别为 97.6%和 92.8%。术后 QOL 评分显著改善。尽管膀胱出口梗阻得到改善,但在 1 年随访时,新出现的尿动力学压力性尿失禁和压力性尿失禁分别增加了 18.9%和 21.6%。网片挤出率为 4.8%。
改良的 Surelift 在术后 1 年具有良好的客观和主观治愈率,网片挤出率为 4.8%。下尿路症状和 QOL 显著改善。6 个月至 12 个月新出现的尿动力学压力性尿失禁有所增加,但不足以引起手术。