Queensland Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Queensland Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Oct;29(10):2104-2110. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 May 13.
Many options exist for reconstructing the shoulder after large bony resections of the proximal humerus. One of the more widely used is endoprosthetic replacement. Proximal migration of unconstrained hemiarthroplasty articulations may cause difficulties particularly in the setting of loss of the rotator cuff and/or deltoid musculature. To attempt to overcome these issues, a fixed-fulcrum constrained reverse shoulder replacement option may be considered.
A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from the Queensland Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma Service was undertaken to compare the function, implant survivorship, and reoperation rate of constrained reverse and unconstrained hemiarthroplasty-type endoprostheses in patients with tumors.
We retrospectively reviewed data on 41 consecutive proximal or total humeral endoprosthetic replacements undertaken between January 2003 and July 2018. One patient was excluded as lost to follow-up prior to 24 months. There were 21 unconstrained implants and 19 constrained shoulder replacements (Stanmore Modular Endoprosthesis Tumour System with Bayley-Walker articulation). Proximal migration of the unconstrained hemiarthroplasty articulation occurred in 8 patients (38%), and dislocation or failure of the constrained mechanism occurred in 5 (26%). Reoperation for implant-related issues was required in 5 patients in the constrained group and none in the unconstrained group. Of the 18 patients alive at the time of review, 12 provided functional scores. The mean follow-up period for surviving patients was 4.2 years (standard deviation, 2.7 years), with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Functional scores were similar between the 2 groups.
Constrained reverse prostheses were associated with a higher reoperation rate in this series without any functional benefit compared with unconstrained hemiarthroplasty-type articulations. We favor the use of unconstrained hemiarthroplasty-type endoprostheses for reconstruction after resection of destructive lesions of the proximal humerus.
在肱骨近端大骨切除后,有许多选择可以进行肩部重建。其中一种应用较广的方法是内置假体置换。未受约束的半关节成形术关节的近端迁移可能会导致问题,特别是在肩袖和/或三角肌肌肉丧失的情况下。为了尝试克服这些问题,可以考虑使用固定支点约束性反向肩关节置换。
对昆士兰骨骼和软组织肉瘤服务中心前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析,比较了肿瘤患者中约束性反向和非约束性半关节成形术式内置假体的功能、假体存活率和再次手术率。
我们回顾了 2003 年 1 月至 2018 年 7 月期间进行的 41 例连续近端或全肱骨内置假体置换的数据。1 例患者因随访 24 个月前失访而被排除。其中 21 例为非约束性假体,19 例为约束性肩部置换(斯坦莫尔模块化假体肿瘤系统与贝利-沃克关节)。8 例(38%)非约束性半关节成形术关节发生近端迁移,5 例(26%)发生约束性机制脱位或失效。约束组中有 5 例患者因植入物相关问题需要再次手术,而非约束组则没有。在复查时存活的 18 例患者中,有 12 例提供了功能评分。存活患者的平均随访时间为 4.2 年(标准差为 2.7 年),随访时间至少为 2 年。两组的功能评分相似。
在本系列中,与非约束性半关节成形术式关节相比,约束性反向假体的再次手术率更高,但功能上没有任何优势。我们倾向于在肱骨近端破坏性病变切除后使用非约束性半关节成形术式内置假体进行重建。