Long-term outcomes of ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation incorporating hidden slow conduction analysis.

BACKGROUND

Ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation (VTSA) incorporating hidden slow conduction (HSC) analysis allows further arrhythmic substrate identification.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to analyze whether the elimination of HSC electrograms (HSC-EGMs) during VTSA results in better short- and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Consecutive patients (N = 70; 63% ischemic; mean age 64 ± 14.6 years) undergoing VTSA were prospectively included. Bipolar EGMs with >3 deflections and duration <133 ms were considered as potential HSC-EGMs. Whenever a potential HSC-EGM was identified, double or triple ventricular extrastimuli were delivered. If a local potential showed up as a delayed component, it was annotated as HSC-EGM. Ablation was delivered at conducting channel entrances and HSC-EGMs. Radiofrequency time, ventricular tachycardia (VT) inducibility after VTSA, and VT/ventricular fibrillation recurrence at 24 months after the procedure were compared with data from a historical control group.

RESULTS

A total of 5076 EGMs were analyzed; 1029 (20.2%) qualified as potential HSC-EGMs, and 475 of them were tagged as HSC-EGMs. Scars in patients with HSC-EGMs (n = 43 [61.4%]) were smaller (32.2 [17-58] cm vs 85 [41-92.4] cm; P = .006) and more heterogeneous (core/scar area ratio 0.15 [0.05-0.44] vs 0.44 [0.33-0.57]; P = .017); 32.4% of HSC-EGMs were located in normal voltage tissue. Patients undergoing VTSA incorporating HSC analysis required less radiofrequency time (15.6 [8-23.1] vs 23.9 [14.9-30.8]; P < .001) and had a lower rate of VT inducibility after VTSA (28.6% vs 52.9%; P = .003) than did the historical controls. Patients undergoing VTSA incorporating HSC analysis showed a higher 2-year VT/ventricular fibrillation-free survival (75.7% vs 58.8%; log-rank, P = .046) after VTSA.

CONCLUSION

VTSA incorporating HSC analysis allowed further arrhythmic substrate identification (especially in the border zone and normal voltage areas) and was associated with increased VTSA efficiency and better short- and long-term outcomes.