• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床实践中用于诊断精神源性非癫痫性发作的自我报告问卷。对现有工具的全面综述。

Self-Report questionnaires for the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures in clinical practice. A comprehensive review of the available instruments.

作者信息

Giussani Giorgia, Erba Giuseppe, Bianchi Elisa, Beghi Ettore

机构信息

Laboratory of Neurological Disorders, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy.

Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.

出版信息

Seizure. 2020 Jul;79:30-43. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.seizure.2020.04.007
PMID:32417685
Abstract

We searched Medline from 1946 to 2019 for reports exploring differences between PNES and other comparable paroxysmal events using clinical instruments, few of which focused on the differential diagnosis using broad-based questionnaires covering multiple aspects of this condition. The majority investigated single items to highlight specific differences, either qualitative or quantitative, between groups and to elucidate some of the pathogenetic mechanisms of PNES. We selected all variables that proved to be useful for differentiating PNES from other types of paroxysmal events and classified them by category, by instrument utilized and method of investigation. This body of data will constitute the basis for assembling a new set of evidence-based questionnaires for patients and eyewitnesses to facilitate the differential diagnosis of these disorders, especially in resource-poor clinical settings. This will require a skillful translation of the content of each selected variable into clear and intuitive questions, appropriate for lay responders. Predictive variables found by more than one investigator, especially if using different approaches, have greater diagnostic weight and should be prominent in future questionnaires. However, even variables so far found to be predictive by one investigator will deserve consideration. Once the preliminary text of the questionnaires is consolidated, the instrument will need extensive testing and validation in large prospective studies before becoming available for clinical use in its definitive format.

摘要

我们检索了1946年至2019年的医学文献数据库(Medline),以查找使用临床工具探索精神性非癫痫性发作(PNES)与其他类似发作性事件之间差异的报告,其中很少有研究使用涵盖该病症多个方面的广泛问卷进行鉴别诊断。大多数研究调查单个项目,以突出组间定性或定量的特定差异,并阐明PNES的一些发病机制。我们选择了所有被证明有助于区分PNES与其他类型发作性事件的变量,并按类别、所使用的工具和调查方法进行分类。这组数据将构成编制一套新的基于证据的患者和目击者问卷的基础,以促进这些疾病的鉴别诊断,特别是在资源匮乏的临床环境中。这需要将每个选定变量的内容巧妙地转化为清晰直观的问题,适合外行人回答。多名研究者发现的预测变量,特别是如果采用不同方法发现的,具有更大的诊断权重,应在未来的问卷中突出显示。然而,即使是目前仅由一名研究者发现具有预测性的变量也值得考虑。一旦问卷的初稿确定下来,在以最终形式供临床使用之前,该工具需要在大型前瞻性研究中进行广泛测试和验证。

相似文献

1
Self-Report questionnaires for the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures in clinical practice. A comprehensive review of the available instruments.临床实践中用于诊断精神源性非癫痫性发作的自我报告问卷。对现有工具的全面综述。
Seizure. 2020 Jul;79:30-43. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
2
Self-reporting versus clinical scrutiny: the value of adding questionnaires to the routine evaluation of seizure disorders. An exploratory study on the differential diagnosis between epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.自我报告与临床检查:在癫痫疾病常规评估中增加问卷调查的价值。一项关于癫痫与精神性非癫痫发作鉴别诊断的探索性研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Jan;90:191-196. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.11.040. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
3
Patients' and caregivers' contributions for differentiating epileptic from psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Value and limitations of self-reporting questionnaires: A pilot study.患者和照护者对鉴别癫痫性与非痫性发作的贡献。自报告问卷的价值和局限性:一项初步研究。
Seizure. 2017 Dec;53:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
4
Diagnostic implications of review-of-systems questionnaires to differentiate epileptic seizures from psychogenic seizures.系统回顾问卷对鉴别癫痫发作与精神性发作的诊断意义。
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Apr;69:69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.11.002. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
5
A comparative retrospective exploration of the profiles of patients in South Africa diagnosed with epileptic and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures.对南非被诊断为癫痫性发作和精神性非癫痫性发作患者资料的比较性回顾性探究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Apr;69:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
6
The diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: a review.心因性非癫痫性发作的诊断:综述
Seizure. 1997 Aug;6(4):243-53. doi: 10.1016/s1059-1311(97)80072-6.
7
Distinct psychopathology profiles in patients with epileptic seizures compared to non-epileptic psychogenic seizures.与非癫痫性心因性发作相比,癫痫发作患者的精神病理学特征明显不同。
Epilepsy Res. 2019 Dec;158:106234. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2019.106234. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
8
Increased odds and predictive rates of MMPI-2-RF scale elevations in patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures and observed sex differences.心因性非癫痫性发作患者中MMPI-2-RF量表升高的几率和预测率增加及观察到的性别差异。
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Jul;72:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.04.023. Epub 2017 May 30.
9
[Phenomenology and psychiatric origins of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures].[心因性非癫痫性发作的现象学与精神科起源]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2004 Jan-Feb;132(1-2):22-7. doi: 10.2298/sarh0402022r.
10
Reliability of reported peri-ictal behavior to identify psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.报告的发作期行为对识别心因性非癫痫发作的可靠性。
Seizure. 2019 Apr;67:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2019.02.021. Epub 2019 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of a Machine-Learning Clinical Decision Aid for the Differential Diagnosis of Transient Loss of Consciousness.用于短暂意识丧失鉴别诊断的机器学习临床决策辅助工具的验证
Neurol Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;15(2):e200448. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200448. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
2
Dissimilar Changes in Serum Cortisol after Epileptic and Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures: A Promising Biomarker in the Differential Diagnosis of Paroxysmal Events?癫痫性和非癫痫性阵发性事件后血清皮质醇的不同变化:鉴别诊断阵发性事件的有前途的生物标志物?
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 5;25(13):7387. doi: 10.3390/ijms25137387.