Shinohara Masaya, Wada Ryou, Yao Shintaro, Yano Kensuke, Akitsu Katsuya, Koike Hideki, Kinoshita Toshio, Yuzawa Hitomi, Suzuki Takeya, Fujino Tadashi, Ikeda Takanori
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Faculty of Medicine.
Int Heart J. 2020 May 30;61(3):510-516. doi: 10.1536/ihj.19-643. Epub 2020 May 15.
The transdermal bisoprolol patch (TB) was designed to maintain a sustained concentration of bisoprolol in plasma by a higher trough concentration than oral bisoporolol (OB). We compared the efficacy between TB and OB in patients with idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) while considering their duration of action.A total of 78 patients with a PVC count of ≥ 3,000 beats/24 hours were divided into groups treated with TB 4 mg (n = 43) or OB 2.5 mg (n = 35). PVCs were divided into positive heart rate (HR) -dependent PVCs (P-PVCs) and non-positive HR-dependent PVCs (NP-PVCs) based on the relationship between the hourly PVC density and hourly mean HR. Twenty-four-hour Holter electrocardiograms were performed before and 1 to 3 months after the initiation of therapy.There were no significant between-group differences in the baseline characteristics. Both the TB (from 14.6 [9.9-19.2] to 7.6 [1.7-15.8]%, P < 0.001) and OB (from 13.2 [7.6-21.9] to 4.6 [0.5-17.0]%, P = 0.0041) significantly decreased the PVC density, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.73). Compared to OB, the TB had similar effects in reducing the PVC density for P-PVCs (P = 0.96), and NP-PVCs (P = 0.71). The TB significantly decreased the P-PVC density from baseline not only during day-time (P < 0.001) but also night-time (P = 0.0017), while the OB did not significantly decrease the P-PVC density from baseline during night-time (P = 0.17).Compared to OB, the TB could be used with the same efficacy of reducing idiopathic PVCs. The TB may be a more useful therapeutic agent than OB for P-PVCs during a 24-hour period.
透皮比索洛尔贴片(TB)旨在通过比口服比索洛尔(OB)更高的谷浓度来维持血浆中比索洛尔的持续浓度。我们在考虑特发性室性早搏(PVC)患者作用持续时间的同时,比较了TB和OB之间的疗效。总共78例PVC计数≥3000次/24小时的患者被分为接受4毫克TB治疗的组(n = 43)或接受2.5毫克OB治疗的组(n = 35)。根据每小时PVC密度与每小时平均心率之间的关系,PVC被分为正心率(HR)依赖性PVC(P-PVC)和非正HR依赖性PVC(NP-PVC)。在治疗开始前和开始后1至3个月进行24小时动态心电图检查。基线特征在组间无显著差异。TB(从14.6[9.9 - 19.2]%降至7.6[1.7 - 15.8]%,P < 0.001)和OB(从13.2[7.6 - 21.9]%降至4.6[0.5 - 17.0]%,P = 0.0041)均显著降低了PVC密度,两组之间无显著差异(P = 0.73)。与OB相比,TB在降低P-PVC(P = 0.96)和NP-PVC(P = 0.71)的PVC密度方面具有相似的效果。TB不仅在白天(P < 0.001)而且在夜间(P = 0.0017)均使P-PVC密度从基线显著降低,而OB在夜间未使P-PVC密度从基线显著降低(P = 0.17)。与OB相比,TB在降低特发性PVC方面具有相同的疗效。在24小时期间,对于P-PVC,TB可能是比OB更有用的治疗药物。