Song Linsheng, Ma Xiaohai, Zhao Xinxiang, Zhao Lei, DeLano Mark, Fan Yang, Wu Bin, Lu Aijia, Tian Jie, He Liping
Department of Radiology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China.
Department of Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China.
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020 Apr;10(2):124-134. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2019.12.11.
The pathological Q-wave (QW) is an important indicator of infarcted myocardial volume indicating a worse prognosis compared to non-Q-wave (NQW) infarctions. Traditional classification divides infarcts into transmural and non-transmural based on QW and NQW. This view has been challenged by the advent of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MR imaging. Conventional LGE (Conv-LGE) detection of subendocardial MI is limited by bright blood pool. Dark Blood LGE imaging (DB-LGE) nulls the blood pool improving the conspicuity and accuracy of detection of subendocardial infarcts. We hypothesize that improved detection of subendocardial enhancement with DB-LGE will result in improved correlation of electrocardiogram (ECG) and extent of infarction.
Sixty-four clinically confirmed infarction patients were enrolled in this prospective study. All the participants underwent cardiac MR imaging including conv-LGE and DB-LGE. Twelve-lead ECG were performed on the same day. The patients were divided into QW and NQW groups by one experienced cardiologist. MI quantitation was by MI% (the ratio of MI volume to whole myocardial volume) and transmural grading, compared using paired -test and Wilcoxon-test, respectively. The image quality obtained by Conv-LGE and DB-LGE were evaluated according to the signal intensity ratio (SIR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR).
Fifty-six subjects were enrolled in the final analysis [23 (41%) QW and 33 (59%) NQW infarcts]. For the QW cohort, both sequences classified infarcts as transmural in 21/23 (91%) subjects and subendocardial in 2/23 (9%). For the NQW cohort, both sequences classified infarcts as transmural in 16/33 (48%) subjects and subendocardial in 17/33 (52%). Using BB-LGE there were significant differences in detecting subendocardial infarcts in QW and NQW cohorts (Z=-5.85, P<0.001). The MI% of QW group was greater than in NQW group (24.2±10.3 .15.9±9.8, P=0.003). Compared to Conv-LGE, BB-LGE provided higher CNR and SIR between infarcted myocardium and blood pool (6.3±2.6 . 2.1±1.3, P<0.001; 5.4±1.9 . 1.3±0.2, P<0.001). BB-LGE detected more subendocardial infarcted segments in the QW group and NQW group (Z=-4.24, P<0.001; Z=-5.57, P<0.001). The larger MI% was displayed in BB-LGE than in Conv-LGE in both QW group and NQW group (24.2±10.3 . 22.6±10.3, P<0.001; 15.9±9.8 .14.6±9.6, P=0.001).
Compared to conventional LGE, DB-LGE can provide more accurate detection and characterization of infarction in terms of transmurality and subendocardial extent. This is important for evaluating QW and NQW MIs. Due to nulling the high signal of blood pool, DB-LGE can effectively improve the identification of subendocardial MI which may be missed on conventional LGE. Therefore, in both QW and NQW MIs, DB-LGE detects more subendocardial MIs and larger MI% is found. This may facilitate more accurate quantitative MR assessment of both QW and NQW MIs and further empower LGE volume as a predictive biomarker.
病理性Q波(QW)是梗死心肌体积的重要指标,与非Q波(NQW)梗死相比,其预后较差。传统分类根据QW和NQW将梗死分为透壁性和非透壁性。这种观点受到延迟钆增强(LGE)磁共振成像出现的挑战。传统LGE(Conv-LGE)对心内膜下心肌梗死的检测受明亮血池的限制。黑血LGE成像(DB-LGE)使血池信号消失,提高了心内膜下梗死灶检测的清晰度和准确性。我们假设,DB-LGE对心内膜下强化的更好检测将导致心电图(ECG)与梗死范围的相关性得到改善。
64例临床确诊的梗死患者纳入本前瞻性研究。所有参与者均接受了包括Conv-LGE和DB-LGE在内的心脏磁共振成像检查。同一天进行了12导联心电图检查。由一位经验丰富的心脏病专家将患者分为QW组和NQW组。心肌梗死定量采用心肌梗死百分比(MI%,即梗死体积与全心肌体积之比)和透壁分级,分别采用配对t检验和Wilcoxon检验进行比较。根据信号强度比(SIR)和对比噪声比(CNR)评估Conv-LGE和DB-LGE获得的图像质量。
56名受试者纳入最终分析[23例(41%)QW梗死和33例(59%)NQW梗死]。对于QW队列,两种序列在21/23(91%)的受试者中将梗死分类为透壁性,在2/23(9%)的受试者中分类为心内膜下。对于NQW队列,两种序列在16/33(48%)的受试者中将梗死分类为透壁性,在17/33(52%)的受试者中分类为心内膜下。使用BB-LGE,在QW和NQW队列中检测心内膜下梗死存在显著差异(Z=-5.85,P<0.001)。QW组的MI%大于NQW组(24.2±10.3对15.9±9.8,P=0.003)。与Conv-LGE相比,BB-LGE在梗死心肌与血池之间提供了更高的CNR和SIR(6.3±2.6对2.1±1.3,P<0.001;5.4±1.9对1.3±0.2,P<0.001)。BB-LGE在QW组和NQW组中检测到更多的心内膜下梗死节段(Z=-4.24,P<0.001;Z=-5.57,P<0.001)。在QW组和NQW组中,BB-LGE显示的MI%均大于Conv-LGE(24.2±10.3对22.6±10.3,P<0.001;15.9±9.8对14.6±9.6,P=0.001)。
与传统LGE相比,DB-LGE在梗死的透壁性和心内膜下范围方面能提供更准确的检测和特征描述。这对于评估QW和NQW心肌梗死很重要。由于使血池的高信号消失,DB-LGE能有效改善传统LGE可能漏诊的心内膜下心肌梗死的识别。因此,在QW和NQW心肌梗死中,DB-LGE检测到更多的心内膜下心肌梗死且发现更大的MI%。这可能有助于对QW和NQW心肌梗死进行更准确的磁共振定量评估,并进一步增强LGE体积作为预测生物标志物的作用。