Turner Adam, Ricketts Thomas, Leslie Laurel K
American Board of Pediatrics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Sep 1;174(9):852-860. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1124.
Geographic proximity to a pediatric subspecialist is a key factor in obtaining specialized care. However, comparative data regarding the number of pediatric subspecialists, distribution of subspecialists, and patient proximity to subspecialists in the United States between 2003 and 2019 have not been explored; the last known national analysis was published in 2006 and used data from 2003.
To compare the number and distribution of pediatric subspecialists and patient proximity to pediatric subspecialists in the United States between 2003 and 2019 and to assess whether the increase in the number of pediatric subspecialists is associated with improvements in patient proximity to specialized care and the geographic distribution of pediatric subspecialists.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This national repeated cross-sectional study used data from the American Board of Pediatrics to examine the overall change in the number of subspecialists for 20 pediatric subspecialties between 2003 and 2019. The study included 24 375 pediatric subspecialists who were 70 years or younger, had active certification from the American Board of Pediatrics as of June 2019, and had addresses in the United States. Subspecialists' addresses were linked by zip code to child population data to evaluate the geographic distribution of subspecialists, the population-weighted averages for service areas, and the straight-line distances to subspecialists. Descriptive statistics and maps were used to examine patient proximity to subspecialists and regional subspecialist distribution and dispersion by hospital referral region. Subspecialist-to-child population ratios per 100 000 children, changes over time, and coefficients of variation were calculated to further elucidate subspecialist distribution. Data were collected in June 2019 and analyzed from July 8, 2019, to December 17, 2019.
Values from 2019 were compared with data from 2003 for mean straight-line distance in miles from patients to subspecialists, by subspecialty; percentage of children younger than 18 years living at specific distance ranges; subspecialist-to-child population ratios across hospital referral regions; and coefficients of variation for population ratios.
Among 24 375 pediatric subspecialists 70 years and younger, 23 436 subspecialists were certified in 1 subspecialty, and 939 subspecialists were certified in more than 1 subspecialty. The number of certified pediatric subspecialists in the United States increased by 76.8% between 2003 and 2019, with increases varying across subspecialties. The estimated means for travel distances decreased among all subspecialties; however, depending on the subspecialty, an estimated 1 million to 39 million children (2%-53%) resided 80 miles or more from a subspecialist. An analysis across hospital referral regions indicated increased subspecialist-to-child ratios and an increased number of regions with a subspecialist but continued wide variation across regions for most subspecialties. Eleven subspecialties had 1 or fewer subspecialists per 100 000 children across hospital referral regions.
Although patient proximity to pediatric subspecialty care has improved nationally, substantial distribution gaps among specific subspecialties remain. Long-term solutions that encourage movement of subspecialists to underserved locations or that extend the practice of current subspecialties may warrant consideration, particularly among subspecialties with a limited number of practitioners.
与儿科专科医生的地理距离是获得专科护理的关键因素。然而,2003年至2019年间美国儿科专科医生数量、专科医生分布以及患者与专科医生的距离等比较数据尚未得到研究;上一次已知的全国性分析发表于2006年,使用的是2003年的数据。
比较2003年至2019年间美国儿科专科医生的数量和分布情况,以及患者与儿科专科医生的距离,并评估儿科专科医生数量的增加是否与患者获得专科护理的便利性改善以及儿科专科医生的地理分布有关。
设计、设置和参与者:这项全国性重复横断面研究使用了美国儿科学会的数据,以研究2003年至2019年间20个儿科亚专业的专科医生数量的总体变化。该研究纳入了24375名70岁及以下的儿科专科医生,他们截至2019年6月拥有美国儿科学会的有效认证,且在美国有地址。通过邮政编码将专科医生的地址与儿童人口数据相关联,以评估专科医生的地理分布、服务区的人口加权平均值以及到专科医生的直线距离。使用描述性统计和地图来检查患者与专科医生的距离以及按医院转诊区域划分的区域专科医生分布和分散情况。计算每10万名儿童的专科医生与儿童人口比率、随时间的变化以及变异系数,以进一步阐明专科医生的分布情况。数据于2019年6月收集,并于2019年7月8日至2019年12月17日进行分析。
将2019年的值与2003年的数据进行比较,以了解各亚专业患者到专科医生的平均直线距离(以英里为单位);18岁以下儿童居住在特定距离范围内的百分比;各医院转诊区域的专科医生与儿童人口比率;以及人口比率的变异系数。
在24375名70岁及以下的儿科专科医生中,23436名专科医生拥有1个亚专业的认证,939名专科医生拥有1个以上亚专业的认证。2003年至2019年间,美国获得认证的儿科专科医生数量增加了76.8%,各亚专业的增幅有所不同。所有亚专业的估计旅行距离均值均有所下降;然而,根据亚专业的不同,估计有100万至3900万儿童(2% - 53%)居住在距离专科医生80英里或更远的地方。对医院转诊区域的分析表明,专科医生与儿童的比率有所增加,有专科医生的区域数量也有所增加,但大多数亚专业在各区域之间仍存在很大差异。在各医院转诊区域,每10万名儿童中,有11个亚专业的专科医生数量为1名或更少。
尽管全国范围内患者获得儿科专科护理的便利性有所改善,但特定亚专业之间仍存在显著的分布差距。鼓励专科医生前往服务不足地区或扩大现有亚专业的业务范围等长期解决方案可能值得考虑,尤其是在从业者数量有限 的亚专业中。