University of Ottawa, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ontario, Canada.
The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada.
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 13;21(3):626-632. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.2.45137.
Patients with severe, symptomatic carotid stenosis can have their subsequent stroke risk reduced by surgical intervention if performed soon after a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke. Patients presenting to an emergency department (ED) without computed tomography angiography (CTA) with TIA/stroke, may require transfer to another hospital for imaging to rule out carotid artery stenosis. The objective of this study was to determine the test characteristics of carotid artery point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in detecting greater than 50% stenosis in patients presenting with TIA/stroke.
We conducted a prospective cohort study on a convenience sample of adult patients presenting to a comprehensive stroke centre with TIA or stroke between June-October 2017. Carotid POCUS was performed. Primary outcome measure, stenosis ≥ 50%, was determined by the final radiology report of CTA. A blinded POCUS expert separately reviewed the archived carotid POCUS scans. We calculated sensitivity and specificity for stenosis ≥ 50%.
We conducted POCUS on 75 patients, of which 70 were included in our analyses. Of those 70, 14.3% were diagnosed with greater than 50% stenosis. Carotid POCUS performed as follows: sensitivity 70.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.8%-93.3%); specificity 86.7% (95% CI, 75.4%-94.1%); positive likelihood ratio (LR +) 5.3 (95% CI, 1.2-9.3); negative likelihood ratio (LR-) 0.4 (95% CI, 0.0-0.7). The inter-rater reliability between POCUS performer interpretation and expert interpretation had moderate agreement (k = 0.68). Scans took a mean 6.2 ± 2.2 minutes to complete.
Carotid POCUS has low to moderate association with CTA for detection of carotid artery stenosis ≥ 50%. Further research and investigation is needed prior to widespread use of carotid POCUS in patients with acute cerebral ischemia. Additionally, external validity is likely affected by availability of training, maintenance of competency, and experience in more rural centres.
对于有严重症状性颈动脉狭窄的患者,如果在短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或中风后不久进行手术干预,可以降低其随后发生中风的风险。在急诊科(ED)就诊的 TIA/中风患者,如果没有进行计算机断层血管造影(CTA),可能需要转至另一家医院进行成像检查以排除颈动脉狭窄。本研究的目的是确定在 TIA/中风患者中使用颈动脉即时超声(POCUS)检测大于 50%狭窄的检测特征。
我们对 2017 年 6 月至 10 月期间在综合卒中中心就诊的 TIA 或中风的成年患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。进行了颈动脉 POCUS。主要结局指标为狭窄程度≥50%,由 CTA 的最终放射学报告确定。一位盲目的 POCUS 专家单独回顾了存档的颈动脉 POCUS 扫描。我们计算了狭窄程度≥50%的敏感性和特异性。
我们对 75 名患者进行了 POCUS 检查,其中 70 名患者纳入我们的分析。在这 70 名患者中,14.3%被诊断为大于 50%的狭窄。颈动脉 POCUS 检查结果如下:敏感性为 70.0%(95%置信区间 [CI],34.8%-93.3%);特异性为 86.7%(95% CI,75.4%-94.1%);阳性似然比(LR +)为 5.3(95% CI,1.2-9.3);阴性似然比(LR-)为 0.4(95% CI,0.0-0.7)。POCUS 检查者的解释与专家解释之间的观察者间一致性为中度(k = 0.68)。扫描平均用时 6.2±2.2 分钟。
颈动脉 POCUS 与 CTA 对检测颈动脉狭窄≥50%的相关性低至中度。在广泛应用于急性脑缺血患者之前,需要进一步研究和调查颈动脉 POCUS。此外,外部有效性可能受到培训的可用性、能力的维持以及在更偏远中心的经验的影响。