Chang Wan-Ling, Chen Pei-Ya, Hsu Po-Jen, Lin Shinn-Kuang
Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City 23142, Taiwan.
School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 97004, Taiwan.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 2;13(11):1952. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111952.
The prevalence of carotid stenosis is considerably higher in asymptomatic individuals with multiple risk factors than in the general population. We investigated the validity and reliability of carotid point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for rapid carotid atherosclerosis screening. We prospectively enrolled asymptomatic individuals with carotid risk scores of ≥7 who underwent outpatient carotid POCUS and laboratory carotid sonography. Their simplified carotid plaque scores (sCPSs) and Handa's carotid plaque scores (hCPSs) were compared. Of 60 patients (median age, 81.9 years), 50% were diagnosed as having moderate- or high-grade carotid atherosclerosis. The overestimation and underestimation of outpatient sCPSs were more likely in patients with low and high laboratory-derived sCPSs, respectively. Bland-Altman plots indicated that the mean differences between the participants' outpatients and laboratory sCPSs were within two standard deviations of their laboratory sCPSs. A Spearman's rank correlation coefficient revealed a strong positive linear correlation between outpatient and laboratory sCPSs (r = 0.956, < 0.001). An intraclass correlation coefficient analysis indicated excellent reliability between the two methods (0.954). Both carotid risk score and sCPS were positively and linearly correlated with laboratory hCPS. Our findings indicate that POCUS has satisfactory agreement, strong correlation, and excellent reliability with laboratory carotid sonography, making it suitable for rapid screening of carotid atherosclerosis in high-risk patients.
具有多种危险因素的无症状个体中颈动脉狭窄的患病率明显高于普通人群。我们调查了床旁即时超声(POCUS)用于快速筛查颈动脉粥样硬化的有效性和可靠性。我们前瞻性纳入了颈动脉风险评分≥7的无症状个体,这些个体接受了门诊颈动脉POCUS检查和实验室颈动脉超声检查。比较了他们的简化颈动脉斑块评分(sCPS)和汉达颈动脉斑块评分(hCPS)。在60例患者(中位年龄81.9岁)中,50%被诊断为中度或高度颈动脉粥样硬化。门诊sCPS高估和低估分别更可能出现在实验室衍生sCPS低和高的患者中。布兰德-奥特曼图表明,参与者门诊和实验室sCPS的平均差异在其实验室sCPS的两个标准差范围内。斯皮尔曼等级相关系数显示门诊和实验室sCPS之间存在强正线性相关(r = 0.956,<0.001)。组内相关系数分析表明两种方法之间具有出色的可靠性(0.954)。颈动脉风险评分和sCPS均与实验室hCPS呈正线性相关。我们的研究结果表明,POCUS与实验室颈动脉超声检查具有令人满意的一致性、强相关性和出色的可靠性,使其适用于对高危患者进行颈动脉粥样硬化的快速筛查。