• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

先前阴性筛查结果的数量并不影响未来乳腺癌的风险。

Number of prior negative screening outcomes does not influence future risk of breast cancer.

机构信息

Section for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Postbox 5313, Majorstuen, 0304, Oslo, Norway.

Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;35(6):549-556. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00645-0. Epub 2020 May 19.

DOI:10.1007/s10654-020-00645-0
PMID:32430839
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7320949/
Abstract

We questioned whether a history of negative screening outcomes could be used to predict breast cancer risk, and thus be used as a potential factor for stratification of mammographic screening. Data from the Norwegian population based breast cancer screening program, BreastScreen Norway, was used to estimate cumulative hazard rates for breast cancer by number of prior negative screening outcomes among participants from 1995 through 2016. We followed three age cohorts of women, who started screening at age 50-54, 55-59, and 60-64 years. Further, we estimated the absolute and relative risk of breast cancer by number of prior negative screening outcomes. The cumulative hazard curves were parallel for all numbers of negative screening outcomes for all age cohorts. The absolute risk of breast cancer increased with number of negative screening outcomes for the youngest age cohort. For the oldest age cohorts, the absolute risk was stable during the screening period and decreased thereafter. The number of negative screening outcomes was not associated with risk of breast cancer, adjusted for age, percent screening attendance and calendar years (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.02). Our results suggest that the number of negative screening outcomes does not predict breast cancer risk among participants in BreastScreen Norway.

摘要

我们质疑阴性筛查结果的历史是否可以用于预测乳腺癌风险,从而作为乳腺筛查分层的潜在因素。使用来自挪威基于人群的乳腺癌筛查计划(挪威乳腺筛查项目)的数据,通过对 1995 年至 2016 年期间参与者的先前阴性筛查结果数量来估计乳腺癌的累积危险率。我们随访了三个年龄队列的女性,她们分别在 50-54 岁、55-59 岁和 60-64 岁开始筛查。此外,我们根据先前的阴性筛查结果数量来估计乳腺癌的绝对风险和相对风险。对于所有年龄队列,所有阴性筛查结果数量的累积危险曲线都是平行的。对于最年轻的年龄队列,随着阴性筛查结果数量的增加,乳腺癌的绝对风险增加。对于最年长的年龄队列,在筛查期间,绝对风险保持稳定,之后则下降。对于年龄、筛查参与率和日历年份进行调整后,阴性筛查结果的数量与乳腺癌风险无关(HR 1.00,95%CI 0.98-1.02)。我们的研究结果表明,在挪威乳腺筛查项目中,阴性筛查结果的数量并不能预测参与者的乳腺癌风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f332/7320949/2bc983e98ee4/10654_2020_645_Fig2a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f332/7320949/173136d00d70/10654_2020_645_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f332/7320949/2bc983e98ee4/10654_2020_645_Fig2a_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f332/7320949/173136d00d70/10654_2020_645_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f332/7320949/2bc983e98ee4/10654_2020_645_Fig2a_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Number of prior negative screening outcomes does not influence future risk of breast cancer.先前阴性筛查结果的数量并不影响未来乳腺癌的风险。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;35(6):549-556. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00645-0. Epub 2020 May 19.
2
Risk of breast cancer by prior screening results among women participating in BreastScreen Norway.挪威乳腺筛查项目中既往筛查结果与乳腺癌发病风险的关系。
Cancer. 2019 Oct 1;125(19):3330-3337. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32330. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
3
The risk of radiation-induced breast cancers due to biennial mammographic screening in women aged 50-69 years is minimal.对于50至69岁的女性而言,每两年进行一次乳房X光筛查所引发辐射性乳腺癌的风险微乎其微。
Acta Radiol. 2014 Dec;55(10):1174-9. doi: 10.1177/0284185113514051. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
4
The cumulative risk of false-positive results in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: updated results.挪威乳腺癌筛查计划中假阳性结果的累积风险:更新结果。
Cancer. 2013 Nov 15;119(22):3952-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28320. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
5
Breast cancer mortality in participants of the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.挪威乳腺癌筛查计划参与者的乳腺癌死亡率。
Cancer. 2013 Sep 1;119(17):3106-12. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28174. Epub 2013 May 29.
6
Is mammography screening history a predictor of future breast cancer risk?乳腺 X 线筛查史能否预测未来乳腺癌风险?
Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;30(2):143-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9972-6. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
7
Overdiagnosis in the population-based organized breast cancer screening program estimated by a non-homogeneous multi-state model: a cohort study using individual data with long-term follow-up.基于人群的乳腺癌筛查计划中过度诊断的估计:使用具有长期随访的个体数据的非同质多状态模型的队列研究。
Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Dec 17;20(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-1082-z.
8
Breast Cancer Mortality After Implementation of Organized Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening in Norway.挪威实施有组织的基于人群的乳腺癌筛查后乳腺癌死亡率的变化。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Aug 1;112(8):839-846. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz220.
9
Lower attendance rates in immigrant versus non-immigrant women in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme.在挪威乳腺癌筛查项目中,移民女性的参与率低于非移民女性。
J Med Screen. 2018 Sep;25(3):155-161. doi: 10.1177/0969141317733771. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
10
Interval Breast Cancer Rates and Histopathologic Tumor Characteristics after False-Positive Findings at Mammography in a Population-based Screening Program.基于人群筛查项目中乳腺 X 线摄影假阳性结果后的间期乳腺癌发生率和组织病理学肿瘤特征。
Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):58-67. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162159. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Is mammography screening history a predictor of future breast cancer risk?乳腺 X 线筛查史能否预测未来乳腺癌风险?
Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;30(2):143-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9972-6. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
2
EMAS position statement: individualized breast cancer screening versus population-based mammography screening programmes.欧洲更年期和男性更年期协会立场声明:个体化乳腺癌筛查与基于人群的乳腺钼靶筛查项目
Maturitas. 2014 Dec;79(4):481-6. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
3
Overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: the importance of length of observation period and lead time.
乳腺癌筛查中的过度诊断:观察期长度和领先时间的重要性。
Breast Cancer Res. 2013 May 16;15(3):R41. doi: 10.1186/bcr3427.
4
Should we individualize breast cancer screening?我们是否应该个体化乳腺癌筛查?
Maturitas. 2012 Nov;73(3):202-5. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
5
Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.基于乳腺癌密度和其他风险因素的个体化乳腺 X 光摄影:健康获益和成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 5;155(1):10-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-1-201107050-00003.
6
Data quality at the Cancer Registry of Norway: an overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness.挪威癌症登记处的数据质量:可比性、完整性、有效性和及时性概述。
Eur J Cancer. 2009 May;45(7):1218-1231. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.037. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
7
Estimation of the duration of a pre-clinical disease state using screening data.利用筛查数据估算临床前疾病状态的持续时间。
Am J Epidemiol. 1983 Dec;118(6):865-86. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113705.