Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA.
School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Acta Neurol Scand. 2020 Aug;142(2):131-138. doi: 10.1111/ane.13286. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
To evaluate the time course of changes in perampanel levels when co-administered with carbamazepine, and following carbamazepine discontinuation, using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model.
The PBPK model was developed, verified using clinical PK data, and used to simulate the effect of abrupt discontinuation and down-titration (75 mg twice daily [bid]/wk) of co-administered carbamazepine 300 mg bid on the PK of perampanel once daily (qd). Perampanel dose tapering (8-4 mg) and up-titration (2-6 mg) were simulated during abrupt carbamazepine 300 mg bid discontinuation to identify a titration schedule that minimizes changes in perampanel plasma concentrations.
The PBPK model accurately reproduced perampanel plasma concentration-time profiles from clinical studies in single- and multiple-dose regimen simulations, including multiple-dose carbamazepine co-administration. The time course of return to pre-induced perampanel levels occurred more slowly following carbamazepine down-titration (48 days after first down-titration) vs abrupt discontinuation (25 days). Perampanel dose tapering (8-4 mg) at abrupt carbamazepine discontinuation produced minimal changes in steady-state concentrations, which returned to the levels observed during carbamazepine co-administration in 15 days from the time of carbamazepine discontinuation. When perampanel was up-titrated in the presence of carbamazepine, return to steady state occurred more slowly when carbamazepine was down-titrated weekly (45 days) vs abrupt discontinuation (~24 days).
This PBPK model simulated and predicted optimal perampanel dose tapering and up-titration schedules for maintaining perampanel levels during conversion to monotherapy. These results may guide physicians when managing conversion from perampanel polytherapy with concomitant enzyme-inducing anti-seizure medications to monotherapy.
使用基于生理学的药代动力学(PBPK)模型评估在与卡马西平联合给药时以及在停用卡马西平后,依匹哌仑水平变化的时间过程。
开发了 PBPK 模型,使用临床 PK 数据进行验证,并用于模拟突然停用和逐步减少(75mg 每日两次[bid]/周)联合给予的卡马西平 300mg bid 对依匹哌仑每日一次(qd)的 PK 的影响。模拟了依匹哌仑剂量渐减(8-4mg)和渐增(2-6mg)在突然停用卡马西平 300mg bid 期间,以确定一种可使依匹哌仑血浆浓度变化最小的滴定方案。
PBPK 模型准确再现了单剂量和多剂量方案模拟中依匹哌仑的血浆浓度-时间曲线,包括多次给予卡马西平联合给药。与突然停药(停药后约 25 天)相比,卡马西平逐渐减少后(首次逐渐减少后约 48 天),依匹哌仑恢复到诱导前水平的时间过程较慢。在突然停用卡马西平时逐渐减少依匹哌仑剂量(8-4mg)可使稳态浓度的变化最小,在停用卡马西平后约 15 天内,这些浓度可恢复到与卡马西平联合给药时观察到的水平。当依匹哌仑在卡马西平存在的情况下逐渐增加时,当卡马西平每周逐渐减少(约 45 天)时,恢复到稳定状态的速度比突然停药(约 24 天)时更慢。
该 PBPK 模型模拟并预测了在转换为单药治疗时维持依匹哌仑水平的最佳依匹哌仑逐渐减少和逐渐增加的剂量方案。这些结果可能有助于医生在管理从依匹哌仑联合治疗与酶诱导性抗癫痫药物转换为单药治疗时。