Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020 Jan-Apr;28(2):2309499020924600. doi: 10.1177/2309499020924600.
Multiple needle punctures (MNPs), for gap balancing in total knee replacement, have less variability in gap widening compared to the conventional released technique. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of gap-balancing techniques in varus osteoarthritis (OA) knees, by serial MNP, after a total knee prosthesis trial component was placed, combined with repetitive knee manipulation.
This study was a retrospective, case-matched study of 161 patients. The data were collected from varus OA knee patients, who had total knee arthroplasty by a single surgeon. Sixty-eight patients required MNP, combined with repetitive knee manipulation for gap balancing, and 93 patients did not. Both groups of MNP patients underwent the same surgical technique and postoperative care protocols.
Knee society scores, in terms of knee score and functional score, were not different in both groups when we started the study, at 6month and 1-year follow-ups ( > 0.05). The femorotibial angle was not significantly different between groups at the start of the study, initial postoperative, 6 months, and 1 year ( = 0.74, 0.45, 0.99, and 0.82, respectively). Medial joint opening in knee radiographic was found in 3% of the patients in the MNP group and in 4% of patients in the control group at 1-year follow-up ( = 0.65).
This study found MNP combined with repetitive knee manipulation was effective, reproductive, and a safe method for varus OA knee. We believe that the cycle of performed needle punctures, knee manipulation, and reevaluation could gradually lengthen the medial soft tissue without risk of over lengthening or medial collateral ligament rupture.
与传统松解技术相比,在全膝关节置换术中进行多次骨膜下穿刺(MNP)以平衡间隙时,间隙增宽的变异性更小。本研究旨在评估在全膝关节假体试模组件放置后,通过连续 MNP 结合重复膝关节操作来平衡间隙技术在膝关节内翻性骨关节炎(OA)患者中的结果。
这是一项回顾性、病例匹配的研究,共纳入 161 例患者。该研究的数据来自接受全膝关节置换术的膝关节内翻性 OA 患者,所有患者均由同一位外科医生完成手术。68 例患者需要进行 MNP,并结合重复膝关节操作以平衡间隙,93 例患者则不需要。两组 MNP 患者均接受相同的手术技术和术后护理方案。
在研究开始时、6 个月和 1 年随访时,两组患者的膝关节协会评分(膝关节评分和功能评分)均无差异(>0.05)。两组患者的股骨胫骨角在研究开始时、初次术后、6 个月和 1 年均无显著差异(=0.74、0.45、0.99 和 0.82)。在 1 年随访时,MNP 组中有 3%的患者出现膝关节放射学检查的内侧关节间隙打开,对照组中有 4%的患者出现这种情况(=0.65)。
本研究发现,MNP 联合重复膝关节操作是一种有效、可重复且安全的治疗膝关节内翻性 OA 的方法。我们认为,进行骨膜下穿刺、膝关节操作和重新评估的周期可以逐渐延长内侧软组织,而不会有过度延长或内侧副韧带断裂的风险。