Limb-Based Patency After Surgical vs Endovascular Revascularization in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

PURPOSE

To determine whether limb-based patency (LBP) after infrainguinal revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is similar between bypass surgery and endovascular therapy (EVT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The database for the urgical Reconstruction vs eripheral tervention in Ptients With Critical Limb Isemia (SPINACH) study was interrogated to identify 130 patients (mean age 73±8 years; 94 men) who underwent bypass surgery and 271 patients (mean age 74±10 years; 178 men) who underwent EVT alone. Skin perfusion pressure (SPP) and the ankle-brachial index (ABI) were measured before the procedure and at 0, 1, and 3 months after revascularization. The outcome measure was hemodynamically evaluated LBP (SPP ≥10 mm Hg or ABI ≥0.1) maintained over the first 3 months after treatment. Any reintervention or major amputation was regarded as loss of LBP. The associations between the revascularization strategy (bypass vs EVT) and between the preoperative characteristics and the study outcome (ie, SPP- or ABI-based LBP), were determined using generalized linear mixed models with a logit link function. Patency rates are presented with the 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

The bypass surgery group had a higher stage of limb severity (WIfI) and anatomic complexity (GLASS) than the EVT group, whereas the EVT group had a higher prevalence of heart failure. Both SPP- and ABI-based LBP rates were higher in the bypass group than in the EVT group. SPP-based LBP rates at 3 months were 73.8% (95% CI 63.4% to 84.2%) in the bypass group and 46.2% (95% CI 38.5% to 53.8%) in the EVT group; the corresponding ABI-based LBP rates were 71.5% (95% CI 61.8% to 81.2%) and 44.0% (95% CI 37.3% to 50.7%).

CONCLUSION

LBP is an important concept in the new global vascular guidelines for assessing the anatomic and hemodynamic status of CLTI patients. The present study found that LBP was significantly lower in the EVT group vs the bypass surgery group.