Suppr超能文献

中重度创伤性脑损伤后的癫痫预防:临床实践的回顾性调查及临床指南的影响

Seizure Prophylaxis Following Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Retrospective Investigation of Clinical Practice and the Impact of Clinical Guidelines.

作者信息

Nichol Heather, Boyd John, Trier Jessica

机构信息

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Queen's University, Kingston, CAN.

Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, CAN.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Apr 17;12(4):e7709. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7709.

Abstract

Background Post-traumatic seizure (PTS) is a major complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, there has been controversy in the literature regarding whether anticonvulsants should be used prophylactically to prevent it, and there is significant variability in practice. The objective of this study is to describe seizure prophylaxis practices after moderate to severe TBI and to determine whether the use of seizure prophylaxis increased following the recommendations of the Quebec Institut National d'Excellence en Santé et Services Sociaux and the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation (INESSS-ONF) guidelines. This study will also compare the characteristics of patients who receive the recommended prophylaxis and those who do not. Methods All adult patients admitted to a level-1 trauma centre for moderate to severe TBI were eligible for this study (n = 96). Medical records including patient age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, mechanism of injury, and occurrence of PTS were reviewed in a retrospective manner regarding the administration of recommended seizure prophylaxis. Results The proportion of patients receiving the recommended seizure prophylaxis was 8%. There was no significant increase after the release of the INESSS-ONF guidelines (p: 0.38). There were no significant differences in demographics, injury characteristics, or rates of early PTS between patients receiving the recommended prophylaxis and those not receiving it (p: >0.05). Conclusion The results indicate that the use of the recommended seizure prophylaxis after moderate to severe TBI is low and that the release of the INESSS-ONF guidelines did not increase its use. Patient and injury factors do not appear to influence the use of seizure prophylaxis. These results highlight variability in seizure prophylaxis practices and the importance of understanding local practice patterns. Implementation strategies should be identified to increase adherence to the recommendations and improve patient care.

摘要

背景

创伤后癫痫(PTS)是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的主要并发症。然而,关于是否应预防性使用抗惊厥药物来预防PTS,文献中存在争议,且实际应用存在显著差异。本研究的目的是描述中重度TBI后的癫痫预防措施,并确定遵循魁北克国家卓越健康与社会服务研究所及安大略神经创伤基金会(INESSS-ONF)指南建议后,癫痫预防措施的使用是否增加。本研究还将比较接受推荐预防措施和未接受推荐预防措施的患者的特征。方法:所有因中重度TBI入住一级创伤中心的成年患者均符合本研究条件(n = 96)。回顾医疗记录,包括患者年龄、性别、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、损伤机制和PTS的发生情况,以回顾性方式了解推荐的癫痫预防措施的实施情况。结果:接受推荐癫痫预防措施的患者比例为8%。INESSS-ONF指南发布后,该比例无显著增加(p:0.38)。接受推荐预防措施和未接受推荐预防措施的患者在人口统计学、损伤特征或早期PTS发生率方面无显著差异(p:>0.05)。结论:结果表明,中重度TBI后推荐的癫痫预防措施使用率较低,INESSS-ONF指南的发布并未增加其使用。患者和损伤因素似乎不影响癫痫预防措施的使用。这些结果凸显了癫痫预防措施实施的差异以及了解当地实践模式的重要性。应确定实施策略,以提高对建议的依从性并改善患者护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验