Ostahowski Paige J, Kannan Nithya, Wainwright Mark S, Qiu Qian, Mink Richard B, Groner Jonathan I, Bell Michael J, Giza Christopher C, Zatzick Douglas F, Ellenbogen Richard G, Boyle Linda Ng, Mitchell Pamela H, Vavilala Monica S
Medical Student Research Training Program, University of Washington School of Medicine.
Departments of 2 Epidemiology.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016 Oct;18(4):499-506. doi: 10.3171/2016.4.PEDS1698. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
OBJECTIVE Posttraumatic seizure is a major complication following traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of this study was to determine the variation in seizure prophylaxis in select pediatric trauma centers. The authors hypothesized that there would be wide variation in seizure prophylaxis selection and use, within and between pediatric trauma centers. METHODS In this retrospective multicenter cohort study including 5 regional pediatric trauma centers affiliated with academic medical centers, the authors examined data from 236 children (age < 18 years) with severe TBI (admission Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 8, ICD-9 diagnosis codes of 800.0-801.9, 803.0-804.9, 850.0-854.1, 959.01, 950.1-950.3, 995.55, maximum head Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥ 3) who received tracheal intubation for ≥ 48 hours in the ICU between 2007 and 2011. RESULTS Of 236 patients, 187 (79%) received seizure prophylaxis. In 2 of the 5 centers, 100% of the patients received seizure prophylaxis medication. Use of seizure prophylaxis was associated with younger patient age (p < 0.001), inflicted TBI (p < 0.001), subdural hematoma (p = 0.02), cerebral infarction (p < 0.001), and use of electroencephalography (p = 0.023), but not higher Injury Severity Score. In 63% cases in which seizure prophylaxis was used, the patients were given the first medication within 24 hours of injury, and 50% of the patients received the first dose in the prehospital or emergency department setting. Initial seizure prophylaxis was most commonly with fosphenytoin (47%), followed by phenytoin (40%). CONCLUSIONS While fosphenytoin was the most commonly used medication for seizure prophylaxis, there was large variation within and between trauma centers with respect to timing and choice of seizure prophylaxis in severe pediatric TBI. The heterogeneity in seizure prophylaxis use may explain the previously observed lack of relationship between seizure prophylaxis and outcomes.
目的 创伤后癫痫是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的主要并发症。本研究旨在确定特定儿科创伤中心在癫痫预防方面的差异。作者假设,儿科创伤中心内部以及不同中心之间在癫痫预防措施的选择和使用上会存在很大差异。方法 在这项回顾性多中心队列研究中,纳入了5家隶属于学术医疗中心的地区性儿科创伤中心,作者检查了236名年龄小于18岁的重度TBI患儿(入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分≤8,ICD - 9诊断编码为800.0 - 801.9、803.0 - 804.9、850.0 - 854.1、959.01、950.1 - 950.3、995.55,头部简明损伤严重程度量表最高评分≥3)的数据,这些患儿在2007年至2011年期间在重症监护病房接受了至少48小时的气管插管。结果 236例患者中,187例(79%)接受了癫痫预防。在5个中心中的2个中心,100%的患者接受了癫痫预防药物治疗。癫痫预防的使用与患者年龄较小(p < 0.001)、创伤性TBI(p < 0.001)、硬膜下血肿(p = 0.02)、脑梗死(p < 0.001)以及脑电图检查的使用(p = 0.023)相关,但与损伤严重程度评分较高无关。在63%使用癫痫预防措施的病例中,患者在受伤后24小时内接受了第一种药物治疗,50%的患者在院前或急诊科接受了首剂治疗。初始癫痫预防最常用的药物是磷苯妥英(47%),其次是苯妥英(40%)。结论 虽然磷苯妥英是最常用于癫痫预防的药物,但在重度儿科TBI中,创伤中心内部以及不同中心之间在癫痫预防的时机和选择方面存在很大差异。癫痫预防使用的异质性可能解释了先前观察到的癫痫预防与预后之间缺乏关联的现象。