Suppr超能文献

癌症疼痛与非癌症疼痛的疼痛干预:三级护理医院经验的回顾性分析

Pain Intervention for Cancer and Non-cancer Pain: A Retrospective Analysis of Tertiary Care Hospital Experience.

作者信息

Ahmad Umair, Abbas Syed A, Hamadani Syeda M, Abbas Syed M, Usman Samia, Hafeez Zeeshan, Ur Rehman Ghafoor Ateeq

机构信息

Anaesthesia, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lahore, PAK.

Internal Medicine, Ittefaq Trust Hospital, Lahore, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Apr 18;12(4):e7719. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7719.

Abstract

Background With the recent advancement in medicine there has been a great emphasis on the management of chronic pain which remains as one of the major contributing factors for functional limitation in patients as well as a financial burden on healthcare. Newer treatment modalities are aimed at terminating the vicious pain cycles and in this regard peripheral nerve blocks have proven to be very effective. Objectives The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions for both cancer and non-cancer patients by objective assessment of the patients before and after the procedure. Materials and methods The study included 252 patients who underwent nerve block procedures in Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital from December 2016 to December 2018. The patients were evaluated using numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, reduction in analgesic doses and patient satisfaction after one and four weeks post procedure. The data was analyzed using mean values and calculating percentages. Results In cancer group, 168 patients were included; mean age 50.49 ± 15.39 with 46.43% females and 53.57% males, the average pain score was 2.62 ± 1.87 post procedure compared with 6.30 ± 1.87 post procedure. 48.21% of the patients reported a reduction in analgesia while 51.79% of the patients kept on using the same analgesics doses. 74.40% of the patients were satisfied and 25.60% patients remained unsatisfied after one week whereas 66.07% were satisfied, 23.81% were not satisfied and 10.12% loss to follow up after four weeks. In non-cancer group 84 patients were included; mean age 56.49 ± 15.79 with 41.67% females and 58.33% males, the average pain score before intervention was 5.99 ± 1.21 and after intervention it was 2.43 ± 1.62. In 73.81% non-cancer patients the analgesics doses were reduced and 70.24% patients were satisfied while 29.76% were unsatisfied after one week. After four weeks 55.95% were satisfied, 22.62% were not satisfied and 21.43% loss to follow up. Conclusion The study showed decrease in pain scores in both group of patients and the importance of nerve blocks as an effective method for chronic pain management. The reduction in the use of other analgesics was also commendable in both the groups.

摘要

背景 随着医学的最新进展,人们高度重视慢性疼痛的管理,慢性疼痛仍然是导致患者功能受限的主要因素之一,也是医疗保健的一项经济负担。新的治疗方式旨在终止恶性循环,在这方面,周围神经阻滞已被证明非常有效。

目的 本研究的目的是通过对患者在手术前后进行客观评估,来评价对癌症患者和非癌症患者干预措施的有效性。

材料和方法 本研究纳入了2016年12月至2018年12月在沙卡特·汗姆纪念癌症医院接受神经阻滞手术的252例患者。在术后1周和4周,使用数字评分量表(NRS)对患者的疼痛、镇痛药物剂量的减少情况以及患者满意度进行评估。采用平均值和计算百分比的方法对数据进行分析。

结果 癌症组纳入168例患者;平均年龄50.49±15.39岁,女性占46.43%,男性占53.57%,术后平均疼痛评分为2.62±1.87分,术前为6.30±1.87分。48.21%的患者报告镇痛药物用量减少,51.79%的患者继续使用相同剂量的镇痛药物。术后1周,74.40%的患者表示满意,25.60%的患者不满意;术后4周,66.07%的患者表示满意,23.81%的患者不满意,10.12%的患者失访。非癌症组纳入84例患者;平均年龄56.49±15.79岁,女性占41.67%,男性占58.33%,干预前平均疼痛评分为5.99±1.21分,干预后为2.43±1.62分。术后1周,73.81%的非癌症患者镇痛药物剂量减少,70.24%的患者表示满意,29.76%的患者不满意。术后4周,55.95%的患者表示满意,22.62%的患者不满意,21.43%的患者失访。

结论 该研究表明两组患者的疼痛评分均有所降低,且神经阻滞作为慢性疼痛管理的一种有效方法具有重要意义。两组患者其他镇痛药物使用量的减少也值得称赞。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c1/7234092/cd1896cd95db/cureus-0012-00000007719-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验