Wierzbowska-Drabik Karina, Picano Eugenio, Simiera Michał, Plewka Michał, Kręcki Radosław, Peruga Jan Z, Kasprzak Jarosław D
1st Department and Chair of Cardiology, Medical University of Lodz, Biegański Hospital, Łódź, Poland.
Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Council Research, Pisa, Italy
Kardiol Pol. 2020 Aug 25;78(7-8):715-724. doi: 10.33963/KP.15376. Epub 2020 May 19.
Predicting the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) may be possible during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) with various indices of left ventricular function.
We assessed the relative value of ejection fraction (EF), force, global longitudinal strain (GLS), and wall motion score index (WMSI) in predicting SYNTAX and Gensini scores in patients with known or suspected CAD.
We prospectively enrolled 223 patients (120 men; mean [SD] age, 62 [9] years) and assessed the following indices: 1) EF (with triplane imaging); 2) force, calculated as the ratio of systolic blood pressure to left ventricular end‑systolic volume; 3) GLS; 4) WMSI. All patients underwent coronary angiography within 12 weeks with SYNTAX and Gensini scores evaluation.
The correlation of SYNTAX and Gensini scores was highest with peak WMSI (SYNTAX, rho = 0.591; Gensini, rho = 0.612; P <0.001), intermediate with peak force (SYNTAX, rho = -0.346; Gensini, rho = -0.377; P <0.001) and GLS (SYNTAX, rho = -0.205; P = 0.002 and Gensini rho = -0.216; P = 0.001), and the weakest for EF (SYNTAX, rho = -0.149; P = 0.03 and Gensini, rho = -0.191; P = 0.006). The similar hierarchy of variables was detected for changes during DSE. In the subgroup after myocardial infarction (n = 66 [27%]), GLS outperformed the force.
In patients with CAD at DSE peak, theWMSI and force were better predictors of the coronary SYNTAX and Gensini scores and CAD severity than GLS or EF. However, in patients after myocardial infarction, the GLS correlation with coronary scores improved and got closer to the visual assessment.
在多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图(DSE)期间,利用各种左心室功能指标可能预测冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的严重程度。
我们评估了射血分数(EF)、力、整体纵向应变(GLS)和壁运动评分指数(WMSI)在预测已知或疑似CAD患者的SYNTAX和Gensini评分中的相对价值。
我们前瞻性纳入了223例患者(120例男性;平均[标准差]年龄,62[9]岁),并评估了以下指标:1)EF(采用三平面成像);2)力,计算为收缩压与左心室收缩末期容积之比;3)GLS;4)WMSI。所有患者在12周内接受冠状动脉造影,并评估SYNTAX和Gensini评分。
SYNTAX和Gensini评分与峰值WMSI的相关性最高(SYNTAX,rho = 0.591;Gensini,rho = 0.612;P<0.001),与峰值力(SYNTAX,rho = -0.346;Gensini,rho = -0.377;P<0.001)和GLS(SYNTAX,rho = -0.205;P = 0.002,Gensini rho = -0.216;P = 0.001)的相关性中等,与EF的相关性最弱(SYNTAX,rho = -0.149;P = 0.03,Gensini,rho = -0.191;P = 0.006)。在DSE期间的变化中也检测到了类似的变量层次结构。在心肌梗死亚组(n = 66[27%])中,GLS优于力。
在DSE峰值时的CAD患者中,WMSI和力比GLS或EF更能预测冠状动脉SYNTAX和Gensini评分以及CAD严重程度。然而,在心肌梗死后的患者中,GLS与冠状动脉评分的相关性有所改善,且更接近视觉评估。