• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

咪达唑仑联合哌替啶或芬太尼镇静在选择性结肠镜检查中的疗效及患者痛苦的作用。

Efficacy of Sedation by Midazolam in Association With Meperidine or Fentanyl and Role of Patient Distress During Elective Colonoscopy.

机构信息

Stefano Pontone, PhD, MD, Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Rossella Palma, MD, Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Nurs. 2020 May/Jun;43(3):258-263. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000456.

DOI:10.1097/SGA.0000000000000456
PMID:32433429
Abstract

Meperidine and fentanyl are opioids currently used in addition to midazolam for sedation and analgesia during colonoscopy in Italy. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of patients' psychological state before elective colonoscopy on the efficacy of the sedation regimens. Eighty outpatients who underwent an elective colonoscopy were included in our study. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire was self-administered to evaluate basal anxiety and depression state. The rate of baseline discomfort was evaluated by a standard 100-mm visual analog scale. Sedation was obtained alternatively with a midazolam-meperidine or midazolam-fentanyl combination. There were no statistically significant differences between the fentanyl and meperidine groups on body mass index, age, and gender composition. Patients in the meperidine group reported less pain during colonoscopy than patients in the fentanyl group. There were statistically significant positive correlations in the meperidine group with the distress, anxiety, and depression. Our study has pointed out greater effectiveness of the midazolam plus meperidine regimen, equal recovery times, and no significant differences in the duration of the endoscopic examinations. The evaluation of patients' psychological status seems to predict the efficacy of sedation when the nociceptive component of pain is well controlled.

摘要

哌替啶和芬太尼是目前在意大利用于结肠镜检查镇静和镇痛的阿片类药物,除了咪达唑仑。本研究的目的是评估患者在选择性结肠镜检查前的心理状态对镇静方案疗效的影响。我们的研究纳入了 80 名接受选择性结肠镜检查的门诊患者。通过自我管理医院焦虑和抑郁量表问卷评估基础焦虑和抑郁状态。通过标准的 100 毫米视觉模拟量表评估基线不适率。镇静作用分别通过咪达唑仑-哌替啶或咪达唑仑-芬太尼联合用药获得。芬太尼组和哌替啶组在体重指数、年龄和性别构成方面无统计学差异。哌替啶组患者在结肠镜检查期间的疼痛程度低于芬太尼组。哌替啶组的痛苦、焦虑和抑郁呈统计学显著正相关。我们的研究指出,咪达唑仑加哌替啶方案的效果更好,恢复时间相同,内镜检查时间无显著差异。当疼痛的伤害感受成分得到很好的控制时,评估患者的心理状态似乎可以预测镇静的效果。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Sedation by Midazolam in Association With Meperidine or Fentanyl and Role of Patient Distress During Elective Colonoscopy.咪达唑仑联合哌替啶或芬太尼镇静在选择性结肠镜检查中的疗效及患者痛苦的作用。
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2020 May/Jun;43(3):258-263. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000456.
2
Midazolam with meperidine or fentanyl for colonoscopy: results of a randomized trial.咪达唑仑联合哌替啶或芬太尼用于结肠镜检查:一项随机试验的结果
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):681-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.033.
3
Sedation with midazolam versus midazolam plus meperidine for routine colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.咪达唑仑与咪达唑仑加哌替啶用于常规结肠镜检查的镇静效果:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2009 Dec;20(4):271-5. doi: 10.4318/tjg.2009.0025.
4
Superiority of split dose midazolam as conscious sedation for outpatient colonoscopy.分次给予咪达唑仑作为门诊结肠镜检查清醒镇静的优越性。
World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Aug 14;15(30):3783-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3783.
5
[Utility of routine use of reversion after sedation in outpatient colonoscopy].[门诊结肠镜检查镇静后常规使用恢复法的效用]
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Jan;28(1):10-4. doi: 10.1157/13070377.
6
Propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for conscious sedation in GI endoscopy.丙泊酚与咪达唑仑及哌替啶用于胃肠内镜检查中的清醒镇静
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Jun;95(6):1476-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02080.x.
7
Practice patterns of sedation for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查镇静的实践模式。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):503-11. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.041. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
8
Comparison of the sedation and recovery profiles of Ro 48-6791, a new benzodiazepine, and midazolam in combination with meperidine for outpatient endoscopic procedures.新型苯二氮䓬类药物Ro 48-6791与咪达唑仑联合哌替啶用于门诊内镜检查的镇静及恢复情况比较。
Anesth Analg. 1999 Oct;89(4):893-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199910000-00014.
9
Impact of fentanyl in lieu of meperidine on endoscopy unit efficiency: a prospective comparative study in patients undergoing EGD.芬太尼替代哌替啶对内镜科室效率的影响:一项在接受 EGD 检查的患者中进行的前瞻性对照研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):883-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.013. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
10
Propofol versus midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists.丙泊酚与咪达唑仑/哌替啶用于门诊结肠镜检查:由内镜医师监督护士给药
Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Jun;55(7):815-25. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.124636.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Analgesia in the Identification and Treatment of Digestive Tract Lesions: A Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind Study.镇痛在消化道病变识别与治疗中的作用:一项随机、前瞻性、双盲研究
Curr Health Sci J. 2023 Jan-Mar;49(1):19-27. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.49.01.19. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
2
Efficacy and safety of EBUS-TBNA under conscious sedation with meperidine and midazolam.在咪达唑仑和哌替啶镇静下进行 EBUS-TBNA 的疗效和安全性。
Thorac Cancer. 2022 Feb;13(4):533-538. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14286. Epub 2022 Jan 7.