Sanford School of Public Policy, Rubinstein Hall, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Department of Economics, University of Melbourne, 111 Barry Street, Level 4 FBE Building, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Jul 1;35(6):676-683. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa023.
Many countries have expanded insurance programmes in an effort to achieve universal health coverage (UHC). We assess a complementary path toward financial risk protection: increased access to technologies that improve health and reduce the risk of large health expenditures. Malawi has provided free HIV treatment since 2004 with significant US Government support. We investigate the impact of treatment access on medical spending, capacity to pay and catastrophic health expenditures at the population level, exploiting the phased rollout of HIV treatment in a difference-in-differences design. We find that increased access to HIV treatment generated a 10% decline in medical spending for urban households, a 7% increase in capacity to pay for rural households and a 3-percentage point decrease in the likelihood of catastrophic health expenditure among urban households. These risk protection benefits are comparable to that found from broad-based insurance coverage in other contexts. Our findings show that targeted treatment programmes that provide free care for high burden causes of death can provide substantial financial risk protection against catastrophic health expenditure, while moving developing nations toward UHC.
许多国家扩大了保险计划,努力实现全民健康覆盖。我们评估了另一种实现财务风险保护的途径:增加获得改善健康和降低高额医疗支出风险的技术的机会。马拉维自 2004 年以来在很大程度上得到美国政府的支持,一直免费提供艾滋病毒治疗。我们利用艾滋病毒治疗分阶段推出的差异设计,在人群层面上调查治疗机会增加对医疗支出、支付能力和灾难性医疗支出的影响。我们发现,获得艾滋病毒治疗的机会增加,使城市家庭的医疗支出减少了 10%,农村家庭的支付能力提高了 7%,城市家庭发生灾难性医疗支出的可能性降低了 3 个百分点。这些风险保护效益与其他情况下广泛保险覆盖所发现的效益相当。我们的研究结果表明,针对高负担死亡原因提供免费护理的有针对性的治疗方案,可以为灾难性医疗支出提供实质性的财务风险保护,同时推动发展中国家实现全民健康覆盖。