[Ophthalmic Pathology - Still the Gold Standard?].

Ophthalmic pathology has a long tradition in Germany. And, like in general pathology, there is continuous progress due to new technologies and the improvement of molecular biology techniques. Ophthalmic pathology cannot be disregarded, particularly in the context of basic research but also as a medium for understanding pathophysiologic interrelationships and evaluating innovative surgical techniques. By means of various examples, the "four columns" of ophthalmic pathology shall be illustrated: diagnostics, clinicopathologic correlation, evaluation of new surgical and medical techniques and finally research. Ophthalmic pathology is not a discipline of the past but is rather one of the future. It develops and improves together with medical and ophthalmological progress and serves, at the same time, as a critical evaluation tool. Clinicopathologic correlations are of paramount importance for a lasting quality in ophthalmology, and we should not risk depriving ourselves of this instrument by carelessly saving at the wrong end and closing our laboratories. Ophthalmic pathology was, is and will further be the gold standard in many aspects of ophthalmology.