Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Plastic Surgery, 1155 N. Mayfair Rd. Suite T2600 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226 United States.
Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Plastic Surgery, 1155 N. Mayfair Rd. Suite T2600 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226 United States.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 Jul;73(7):1277-1284. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
Body mass index (BMI) has long been the proxy for patient selection in obese patients presenting for abdominally based breast reconstruction. BMI, however, fails to accurately reflect the distribution of abdominal adipose tissue. This study aims to quantify the effect of abdominal wall thickness on the incidence of post-operative complications and contrast abdominal wall thickness and BMI as predictors of post-operative morbidity.
We performed a retrospective review of 106 consecutive patients who underwent abdominally based breast reconstruction. Abdominal wall thickness was quantified using preoperative CT angiograms. Primary outcomes included delayed wound healing (abdomen and/or breast), flap fat necrosis, return to OR in 30 days, infection, and flap loss.
Patients experiencing delayed abdominal wound healing (n=38), delayed breast wound healing (n=27), and flap fat necrosis (n=24) had significantly thicker abdominal wall measurements (p<0.0015). Of the 24 patients with palpable fat necrosis, 11 required excision. Increasing abdominal wall thickness significantly increased the odds of delayed abdominal wound healing (p=0.0005), delayed breast wound healing (p=0.0009), flap fat necrosis (p=0.0028), and infection (p=0.0198). Compared to BMI, abdominal wall thickness proved to be a more accurate predictor of delayed breast wound healing, any delayed wound healing, flap fat necrosis, and infection.
Our data indicate that as abdominal wall thickness increases, so does the risk of postoperative morbidity. Abdominal wall thickness outperformed BMI as a predictor of postoperative morbidity in several areas. This suggests that objective data obtained from preoperative CT scans may allow more accurate, individualized perioperative risk assessment.
体质量指数(BMI)一直是肥胖患者接受腹部乳房重建时选择患者的指标。然而,BMI 无法准确反映腹部脂肪组织的分布。本研究旨在量化腹壁厚度对术后并发症发生率的影响,并对比腹壁厚度和 BMI 作为术后发病率的预测指标。
我们对 106 例连续接受腹部乳房重建的患者进行了回顾性研究。使用术前 CT 血管造影术量化腹壁厚度。主要结果包括延迟性腹部愈合(腹部和/或乳房)、皮瓣脂肪坏死、术后 30 天内再次手术、感染和皮瓣坏死。
发生延迟性腹部伤口愈合(n=38)、延迟性乳房伤口愈合(n=27)和皮瓣脂肪坏死(n=24)的患者腹壁测量值明显更厚(p<0.0015)。在 24 例可触及脂肪坏死的患者中,有 11 例需要切除。腹壁厚度增加显著增加了延迟性腹部伤口愈合(p=0.0005)、延迟性乳房伤口愈合(p=0.0009)、皮瓣脂肪坏死(p=0.0028)和感染(p=0.0198)的风险。与 BMI 相比,腹壁厚度在预测延迟性乳房伤口愈合、任何延迟性伤口愈合、皮瓣脂肪坏死和感染方面更准确。
我们的数据表明,随着腹壁厚度的增加,术后发病率也随之增加。在多个方面,腹壁厚度作为术后发病率的预测指标优于 BMI。这表明术前 CT 扫描获得的客观数据可能允许更准确、个体化的围手术期风险评估。