Schmitz-Steinkrüger Helen, Lange Catharina, Apostolova Ivayla, Amthauer Holger, Lehnert Wencke, Klutmann Susanne, Buchert Ralph
Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
EJNMMI Phys. 2020 May 20;7(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40658-020-00304-z.
This study investigated the impact of the size of the normal database on the classification performance of the specific binding ratio (SBR) in dopamine transporter (DAT) SPECT with [I]FP-CIT in different settings.
The first subject sample comprised 645 subjects from the Parkinson's Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI), 207 healthy controls (HC), and 438 Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. The second sample comprised 372 patients from clinical routine patient care, 186 with non-neurodegenerative parkinsonian syndrome (PS) and 186 with neurodegenerative PS. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images of the clinical sample were reconstructed with two different reconstruction algorithms (filtered backprojection, iterative ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction with resolution recovery). The putaminal specific binding ratio (SBR) was computed using an anatomical region of interest (ROI) predefined in standard (MNI) space in the Automated Anatomic Labeling (AAL) atlas or using hottest voxels (HV) analysis in large predefined ROIs. SBR values were transformed to z-scores using mean and standard deviation of the SBR in a normal database of varying sizes (n = 5, 10, 15,…, 50) randomly selected from the HC subjects (PPMI sample) or the patients with non-neurodegenerative PS (clinical sample). Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for identifying patients with PD or neurodegenerative PS were determined as performance measures using a predefined fixed cutoff on the z-score. This was repeated for 10,000 randomly selected normal databases, separately for each size of the normal database. Mean and 5th percentile of the performance measures over the 10,000 realizations were computed. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity when using the whole set of HC or non-neurodegenerative PS subjects as normal database were used as benchmark.
Mean loss of accuracy of the putamen SBR z-score was below 1% when the normal database included at least 15 subjects, independent of subject sample (PPMI or clinical), reconstruction method (filtered backprojection or OSEM), and ROI method (AAL or HV). However, the variability of the accuracy of the putamen SBR z-score decreased monotonically with increasing size of normal database and was still considerable at size 15. In order to achieve less than 5% "maximum" loss of accuracy (defined by the 5th percentile) in all settings required at least 25 to 30 subjects in the normal database. Reduction of mean and "maximum" loss of accuracy of the putamen SBR z-score by further increasing the size of the normal database was very small beyond size 40.
The results of this study suggest that 25 to 30 is the minimum size of the normal database to reliably achieve good performance of semi-quantitative analysis in dopamine transporter (DAT) SPECT, independent of the algorithm used for image reconstruction and the ROI method used to estimate the putaminal SBR.
本研究调查了正常数据库大小对不同情况下使用[I]FP - CIT进行多巴胺转运体(DAT)单光子发射计算机断层显像(SPECT)中特异性结合率(SBR)分类性能的影响。
第一个受试者样本包括来自帕金森病进展标志物倡议(PPMI)的645名受试者、207名健康对照(HC)和438名帕金森病(PD)患者。第二个样本包括来自临床常规患者护理的372名患者,其中186名患有非神经退行性帕金森综合征(PS),186名患有神经退行性PS。临床样本的单光子发射计算机断层显像(SPECT)图像使用两种不同的重建算法进行重建(滤波反投影、带分辨率恢复的迭代有序子集期望最大化(OSEM)重建)。使用自动解剖标记(AAL)图谱中在标准(MNI)空间预定义的解剖感兴趣区域(ROI)或在大的预定义ROI中使用最热体素(HV)分析来计算壳核特异性结合率(SBR)。使用从HC受试者(PPMI样本)或非神经退行性PS患者(临床样本)中随机选择的不同大小(n = 5、10、15、…、50)的正常数据库中的SBR均值和标准差,将SBR值转换为z分数。使用z分数上的预定义固定截断值,将识别PD或神经退行性PS患者的准确性、敏感性和特异性确定为性能指标。对10000个随机选择的正常数据库重复此操作,每个正常数据库大小分别进行。计算10000次实现中性能指标的均值和第5百分位数。将使用整个HC或非神经退行性PS受试者集作为正常数据库时的准确性、敏感性和特异性用作基准。
当正常数据库至少包含15名受试者时,壳核SBR z分数的平均准确性损失低于1%,与受试者样本(PPMI或临床)、重建方法(滤波反投影或OSEM)和ROI方法(AAL或HV)无关。然而,壳核SBR z分数准确性的变异性随着正常数据库大小的增加而单调降低,在大小为15时仍然相当大。为了在所有设置中实现低于5%的“最大”准确性损失(由第5百分位数定义),正常数据库中至少需要25至30名受试者。正常数据库大小超过40后,进一步增加其大小对壳核SBR z分数准确性的均值和“最大”损失的降低非常小。
本研究结果表明,25至30是正常数据库的最小大小,以可靠地实现多巴胺转运体(DAT)SPECT中半定量分析的良好性能,与用于图像重建的算法和用于估计壳核SBR的ROI方法无关。