• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于梗阻性尿石症和需要紧急干预的其他诊断的临床预测规则的推导:CLAD 评分。

Derivation of a clinical predicting rule for obstructive urolithiasis and alternative diagnosis requiring urgent intervention: the CLAD score.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Toulouse University Hospital, 31059, Toulouse, France.

Laboratory of Epidemiology and Public Health Analysis, UMR 1027, EQUITY, INSERM, 31000, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

Urolithiasis. 2021 Apr;49(2):145-152. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01191-w. Epub 2020 May 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-020-01191-w
PMID:32436003
Abstract

Most patients with renal colic are discharged from the emergency department (ED) after evaluation and pain alleviation. These patients may not require urgent imaging by computed tomography. We derived a clinical prediction score in patients with renal colic to identify those at very low risk for complications and alternative diagnoses requiring urgent intervention. This retrospective chart review was carried out in 2 ED at an urban university hospital from January to December 2015. All patients with a diagnosis of renal colic were included. The primary outcome was an intervention required for renal colic or alternative diagnoses within 7 days of ED presentation. A stepwise logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with the outcome. A score was derived as a weighted sum of these predictors and its performance was calculated. The database was submitted to the French National Commission for Data Protection and Liberties (CNIL): declaration n°2164898v0 (03/22/2018). 871 with complete data were analyzed. In 94 (11%) patients, an intervention was performed for obstructive urolithiasis or alternative diagnosis. Five factors were most predictive of intervention: age > 45 years (1 point), a history of urologic surgery (1 point), pulse > 100 bpm (1 point), temperature > 37.8 °C (2 point), and urine dipstick negative for blood (1 point), yielding a score of 0-6 points (the Complicated uroLithiasis and Alternative Diagnosis (CLAD) score). The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82 (95% CI 0.77-0.87). We derived a clinical score for renal colic that predicted the presence of obstructive urolithiasis and acute alternative diagnoses requiring intervention.

摘要

大多数肾绞痛患者在接受评估和疼痛缓解后从急诊科(ED)出院。这些患者可能不需要紧急进行计算机断层扫描。我们在肾绞痛患者中得出了一个临床预测评分,以确定那些并发症风险极低且需要紧急干预的其他诊断的患者。这项回顾性图表研究于 2015 年 1 月至 12 月在一家城市大学医院的 2 个 ED 进行。所有诊断为肾绞痛的患者均包括在内。主要结果是在 ED 就诊后 7 天内需要进行肾绞痛或其他诊断的干预。使用逐步逻辑回归评估与结果相关的因素。得出一个分数作为这些预测因子的加权和,并计算其性能。该数据库已提交给法国国家数据保护和自由委员会(CNIL):声明 n°2164898v0(2018 年 3 月 22 日)。分析了 871 例具有完整数据的患者。在 94 例(11%)患者中,因梗阻性尿路结石或其他诊断而进行了干预。最能预测干预的五个因素是:年龄>45 岁(1 分)、泌尿科手术史(1 分)、脉搏>100 bpm(1 分)、体温>37.8°C(2 分)和尿液干化学试带阴性(1 分),总分为 0-6 分(复杂的尿路结石和其他诊断(CLAD)评分)。受试者工作特征曲线下的面积为 0.82(95%置信区间 0.77-0.87)。我们得出了一个肾绞痛临床评分,可预测梗阻性尿路结石和需要干预的急性其他诊断的存在。

相似文献

1
Derivation of a clinical predicting rule for obstructive urolithiasis and alternative diagnosis requiring urgent intervention: the CLAD score.用于梗阻性尿石症和需要紧急干预的其他诊断的临床预测规则的推导:CLAD 评分。
Urolithiasis. 2021 Apr;49(2):145-152. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01191-w. Epub 2020 May 20.
2
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome in patients with acute obstructive upper tract urinary stone: a risk factor for urgent renal drainage and revisit to the emergency department.急性上尿路尿石症患者全身炎症反应综合征:急诊紧急肾脏引流和再次就诊的危险因素。
BMC Urol. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00644-z.
3
Risk Factors Associated with Urologic Intervention in Emergency Department Patients with Suspected Renal Colic.急诊科疑似肾绞痛患者泌尿系统干预相关危险因素
J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;49(2):130-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.12.085. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
4
Failed validation of risk prediction model for intervention in renal colic patients after emergency department evaluation.急诊科评估后肾绞痛患者干预风险预测模型的验证失败。
ANZ J Surg. 2016 Nov;86(11):930-933. doi: 10.1111/ans.13109. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
5
Prevalence of microhematuria in renal colic and urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肾绞痛和尿路结石中镜下血尿的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2020 Aug 8;20(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00690-7.
6
The utility of renal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of renal colic in emergency department patients.肾脏超声检查在急诊科肾绞痛患者诊断中的应用。
CJEM. 2010 May;12(3):201-6. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500012240.
7
Normal renal sonogram identifies renal colic patients at low risk for urologic intervention: a prospective cohort study.正常肾脏超声检查可识别出泌尿系统干预低风险的肾绞痛患者:一项前瞻性队列研究。
CJEM. 2015 Jan;17(1):38-45. doi: 10.2310/8000.2013.131333.
8
Current Diagnostic Approach and Initial Treatment Patterns for Renal Colic in Emergency Department.急诊科肾绞痛的当前诊断方法和初始治疗模式
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2017 Jan;15(1):38-43. doi: 10.3126/jnhrc.v15i1.18012.
9
Impact of a delayed presentation to the emergency department for acute renal colic on biochemical and clinical outcomes.急性肾绞痛患者延迟就诊于急诊科对生化指标及临床结局的影响。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2023 Jan-Feb;47(1):41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.12.013. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
10
Predicting emergency interventions in patients with acute ureteral colic using acute renal colic scoring system in a Pakistani cohort.在巴基斯坦队列中使用急性肾绞痛评分系统预测急性输尿管绞痛患者的紧急干预措施。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Jan;53(1):21-26. doi: 10.1007/s11255-020-02607-7. Epub 2020 Aug 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Reply to "Urolithiasis diagnosis with CHOKAI rule; are we there yet?".
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr;38(4):844-845. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.09.017. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
2
Disparities in care among patients presenting to the emergency department for urinary stone disease.在因尿路结石病到急诊就诊的患者中存在护理差异。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Jun;48(3):217-225. doi: 10.1007/s00240-019-01136-y. Epub 2019 Apr 25.