Suppr超能文献

咪达唑仑微剂量在药物相互作用评估的早期临床开发中的应用。

Midazolam microdosing applied in early clinical development for drug-drug interaction assessment.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach an der Riss, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jan;87(1):178-188. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14389. Epub 2020 Jun 10.

Abstract

AIMS

We aimed to incorporate a pharmacologically inactive midazolam microdose into early clinical studies for the assessment of CYP3A drug-drug interaction liability.

METHODS

Three early clinical studies were conducted with substances (Compounds A, B and C) which gave positive CYP3A perpetrator signals in vitro. A 75 μg dose of midazolam was administered alone (baseline CYP3A activity) followed by administration with the highest dose groups tested for each compound on Day 1/3 and Day 14 or Day 17. Midazolam exposure (AUC , C ) during administration with the test substances was compared to baseline data via an analysis of variance on log-transformed data. Partial AUC ratios were also compared to AUC ratios using linear regression on log-transformed data.

RESULTS

Test compound C values exceeded relevant thresholds for drug-drug interaction liability. Midazolam concentrations were quantifiable over the full profiles for all subjects in all studies. Point estimates of the midazolam AUC gMean ratios ranged from 108.3 to 127.1% for Compound A, from 93.3 to 114.5% for Compound B, and from 92.0 to 96.7% for the two highest dose groups of Compound C. C gMean ratios were in the same range. Thus, no relevant drug-drug interactions were evident, based on the results of midazolam microdosing. AUC ratios from these studies were comparable to the AUC ratios.

CONCLUSION

Midazolam microdosing incorporated into early clinical studies is a feasible tool for reducing dedicated drug-drug interaction studies, meaning reduced subject burden. Limited sampling could further reduce subject burden, costs and needed resources.

摘要

目的

我们旨在将一种药理学上无活性的咪达唑仑微剂量纳入早期临床研究,以评估 CYP3A 药物相互作用的风险。

方法

进行了三项早期临床研究,研究对象为体外具有阳性 CYP3A 促效剂信号的物质(化合物 A、B 和 C)。单独给予 75μg 咪达唑仑剂量(CYP3A 活性基线),然后在第 1/3 天和第 14 天或第 17 天给予每种化合物的最高测试剂量组。通过对对数转换数据进行方差分析,比较咪达唑仑与试验物质联合给药时的暴露量(AUC ,C )与基线数据。还通过对对数转换数据进行线性回归,比较了部分 AUC 比值与 AUC 比值。

结果

测试化合物 C 的值超过了药物相互作用风险的相关阈值。所有研究的所有受试者均在整个研究过程中可定量检测到咪达唑仑浓度。化合物 A 的咪达唑仑 AUC gMean 比值的点估计值范围为 108.3%至 127.1%,化合物 B 的比值范围为 93.3%至 114.5%,化合物 C 的两个最高剂量组的比值范围为 92.0%至 96.7%。C gMean 比值也在相同范围内。因此,根据咪达唑仑微剂量的结果,没有明显的药物相互作用。这些研究的 AUC 比值与 AUC 比值相当。

结论

纳入早期临床研究的咪达唑仑微剂量是减少专门的药物相互作用研究的可行工具,这意味着降低了受试者的负担。有限采样可以进一步减少受试者的负担、成本和所需的资源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验