• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在有复发性流产病史的患者中,转诊后的第一次妊娠活产几率不受其亲属生殖史的影响。

Chance of live birth in the first pregnancy after referral among patients with recurrent pregnancy loss is not influenced by their relatives' reproductive history.

机构信息

Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Unit, Capital Region of Denmark, University Hospital Copenhagen Rigshospitalet and Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.

Department of Clinical medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2020 Jun;25(3):209-212. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2020.1755033. Epub 2020 May 21.

DOI:10.1080/13625187.2020.1755033
PMID:32436443
Abstract

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is defined as three or more consecutive pregnancy losses and affects 1-3% of couples trying to conceive. Pregnancy loss is more common among RPL patients' siblings than in the general population. Our objective was to investigate whether first-degree relatives with pregnancy losses influenced the chance of live birth in the first pregnancy after referral among women with RPL. This is a cohort study of 2138 women with RPL seen at the Danish RPL Unit at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet between January 1st 2000 and December 31st 2017 with follow-up until December 2018. Pregnancies among first-degree relatives were reported by patients at their first consultation. Chance of live birth after referral was compared by logistic regression analysis. Overall, 76% of the referred women achieved a pregnancy after referral and of these, 58% delivered a live born child. Women whose mother had experienced pregnancy loss were referred at a younger age than women with no pregnancy losses among first-degree relatives (mean age 33.6 (SD 4.6) versus 34.3 (SD 4.5),  = 0.002). Pregnancy losses among first-degree relatives did not influence chance of live birth. Our results indicate that pregnancy losses among first-degree family members is not an important risk factor for outcome of the first pregnancy after referral among women with RPL.

摘要

复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)定义为连续三次或更多次妊娠丢失,影响 1-3%的尝试受孕夫妇。与普通人群相比,RPL 患者的兄弟姐妹发生妊娠丢失的几率更高。我们的目的是研究 RPL 患者的一级亲属是否存在妊娠丢失是否会影响其在转诊后首次妊娠的活产机会。这是一项队列研究,共纳入 2138 名 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间在哥本哈根大学医院 Rigshospitalet 的丹麦 RPL 中心就诊的 RPL 患者,随访至 2018 年 12 月。患者在首次就诊时报告一级亲属的妊娠情况。通过逻辑回归分析比较转诊后的活产机会。总体而言,76%的转诊女性在转诊后成功妊娠,其中 58%分娩活产儿。有妊娠丢失母亲的女性比一级亲属无妊娠丢失的女性转诊年龄更小(平均年龄 33.6(SD 4.6)对 34.3(SD 4.5),=0.002)。一级亲属的妊娠丢失并不影响活产机会。我们的研究结果表明,一级亲属的妊娠丢失并不是 RPL 患者转诊后首次妊娠结局的重要危险因素。

相似文献

1
Chance of live birth in the first pregnancy after referral among patients with recurrent pregnancy loss is not influenced by their relatives' reproductive history.在有复发性流产病史的患者中,转诊后的第一次妊娠活产几率不受其亲属生殖史的影响。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2020 Jun;25(3):209-212. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2020.1755033. Epub 2020 May 21.
2
Non-visualized pregnancy losses are prognostically important for unexplained recurrent miscarriage.对于不明原因的复发性流产,未可视化的妊娠丢失在预后方面具有重要意义。
Hum Reprod. 2014 May;29(5):931-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu042. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
3
Anti-Müllerian hormone and live birth in unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.抗苗勒管激素与不明原因复发性流产的活产率。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2023 Jun;46(6):995-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.01.023. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
4
Prospective reproductive outcomes according to sperm parameters, including DNA fragmentation, in recurrent pregnancy loss.复发性流产患者根据精子参数(包括 DNA 碎片)预测的生殖结局。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2024 Aug;49(2):103773. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103773. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
5
Recurrent pregnancy loss: what is the impact of consecutive versus non-consecutive losses?复发性流产:连续流产与非连续流产的影响有何不同?
Hum Reprod. 2016 Nov;31(11):2428-2434. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew169. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
6
Prevalence, causes, and impact of non-visualized pregnancy losses in a recurrent pregnancy loss population.复发性妊娠丢失人群中非可见性妊娠丢失的发生率、原因和影响。
Hum Reprod. 2023 May 2;38(5):830-839. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead040.
7
Evaluating risk factors in recurrent pregnancy loss: A prospective cohort study and its impact on live birth outcomes.评估复发性妊娠丢失的风险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究及其对活产结局的影响。
J Reprod Immunol. 2024 Sep;165:104297. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2024.104297. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
8
Smoking and recurrent pregnancy loss: A cohort study of 2829 women.吸烟与反复妊娠丢失:一项 2829 名女性的队列研究。
J Reprod Immunol. 2024 Aug;164:104257. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2024.104257. Epub 2024 May 16.
9
Serum ferritin level is inversely related to number of previous pregnancy losses in women with recurrent pregnancy loss.血清铁蛋白水平与复发性流产妇女既往流产次数呈负相关。
Fertil Steril. 2021 Feb;115(2):389-396. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1410. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
10
Reproductive outcomes in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss after embryonic chromosomal microarray analysis.胚胎染色体微阵列分析后复发性妊娠丢失夫妇的生殖结局。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Jan;41(1):161-170. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02971-0. Epub 2023 Oct 24.