Gkalitsiou Zoi, Byrd Courtney, Griffin Zenzi
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Texas at Austin.
Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Jun 22;63(6):1688-1699. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00045. Epub 2020 May 20.
Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate executive control in adults who stutter (AWS) and adults who do not stutter (AWNS) via a nonspeech paradigm, wherein eye movements were monitored (i.e., antisaccade task). Processes involved in an antisaccade task include working memory, attention, and voluntary motor control, but the task primarily provides insight into inhibitory control. Method Seventeen AWS (14 men, three women; = 23.41 years) and 17 AWNS ( = 23.29 years) were presented with a combination of prosaccade (i.e., looking toward a target) and antisaccade (i.e., suppress a reflexive saccade toward the target and look in the opposite direction) trials. The distance of the target from the center of the screen was also manipulated (i.e., 5.5 = short distance and 10.8 = long distance). Data for accuracy and reaction time of the first accurate saccade were collected and analyzed. Results No difference was found between AWS and AWNS in accuracy or in reaction time. Both groups were more accurate in the prosaccade than the antisaccade trials and in the long compared to the short distance trials. Furthermore, both groups demonstrated longer saccade latencies for long compared to short distances and for antisaccade compared to prosaccade trials. Conclusions Preliminary results do not support deficits in inhibition in AWS during a motorically simple, non-speech-related oculomotor task, but additional research is warranted.
目的 本研究的目的是通过一种非言语范式,即监测眼动(即反扫视任务),来调查口吃成年人(AWS)和非口吃成年人(AWNS)的执行控制能力。反扫视任务涉及的过程包括工作记忆、注意力和自主运动控制,但该任务主要提供对抑制控制的洞察。方法 向17名AWS(14名男性,3名女性;平均年龄 = 23.41岁)和17名AWNS(平均年龄 = 23.29岁)呈现顺向扫视(即看向目标)和反扫视(即抑制向目标的反射性扫视并看向相反方向)试验的组合。还对目标与屏幕中心的距离进行了操控(即5.5 = 短距离,10.8 = 长距离)。收集并分析了首次准确扫视的准确性和反应时间数据。结果 在准确性或反应时间方面,AWS和AWNS之间未发现差异。与反扫视试验相比,两组在顺向扫视试验中更准确,与短距离试验相比,在长距离试验中更准确。此外,与短距离相比,两组在长距离试验中的扫视潜伏期更长,与顺向扫视试验相比,在反扫视试验中的扫视潜伏期更长。结论 初步结果不支持在一项运动简单、与言语无关的眼动任务中,AWS存在抑制缺陷,但仍需进一步研究。