• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利辅助自杀的宪法合法性引发的医学法律和生物伦理视角。

Medico-legal and bioethical perspectives following the constitutional legitimacy of assisted suicide in Italy.

机构信息

Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Med Leg J. 2020 Sep;88(3):151-154. doi: 10.1177/0025817220923687. Epub 2020 May 21.

DOI:10.1177/0025817220923687
PMID:32437262
Abstract

Assisted suicide is the subject of much debate throughout the world. In Italy, on 24 September 2019, the Italian Constitutional Court legitimised assisted suicide under certain conditions: self-determination capacity, irreversible illness and intense physical/psychological suffering of the patient. This historic judgement surely paved the way for an evolution of the Italian legal framework on the matter but also raised some challenging medico-legal and bioethical questions. This study aims at analysing two of the most controversial among them: the inclusion of psychiatric patients among eligible patients for assisted suicide and the position of physicians related to their right to conscientious objection.

摘要

协助自杀是全世界争论的焦点。2019 年 9 月 24 日,意大利宪法法院在某些条件下使协助自杀合法化:患者有自我决定能力、患有不可逆转的疾病以及承受强烈的身体/心理痛苦。这一历史性的判决无疑为意大利在该问题上的法律框架的演变铺平了道路,但也引发了一些具有挑战性的医学法律和生物伦理问题。本研究旨在分析其中两个最具争议的问题:将精神疾病患者纳入有资格接受协助自杀的患者群体,以及医生与他们的良心拒绝对其相关的立场。

相似文献

1
Medico-legal and bioethical perspectives following the constitutional legitimacy of assisted suicide in Italy.意大利辅助自杀的宪法合法性引发的医学法律和生物伦理视角。
Med Leg J. 2020 Sep;88(3):151-154. doi: 10.1177/0025817220923687. Epub 2020 May 21.
2
Medically assisted suicide in Italy: the recent judgment of the Constitutional Court.意大利的医疗协助自杀:宪法法院的最新判决。
Clin Ter. 2021 May 5;172(3):193-196. doi: 10.7417/CT.2021.2312.
3
[Medical assistence to die, and law.].[医疗协助死亡与法律。]
Recenti Prog Med. 2019 Oct;110(10):462-472. doi: 10.1701/3246.32161.
4
Euthanasia and assisted dying: what is the current position and what are the key arguments informing the debate?安乐死和协助自杀:目前的立场是什么,有哪些关键论点影响了这场辩论?
J R Soc Med. 2018 Nov;111(11):407-413. doi: 10.1177/0141076818803452.
5
First Case of Medically Assisted Suicide in Italy Set New Legal Perspectives.意大利首例安乐死案开创了新的法律视角。
Clin Ter. 2024 Jan-Feb;175(1):7-10. doi: 10.7417/CT.2024.5026.
6
Physician assisted suicide and the Supreme Court: putting the constitutional claim to rest.医生协助自杀与最高法院:终结宪法诉求
Am J Public Health. 1997 Dec;87(12):2058-62. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.12.2058.
7
Should euthanasia and assisted suicide for psychiatric disorders be permitted? A systematic review of reasons.是否应该允许对精神障碍实施安乐死和协助自杀?原因的系统综述。
Psychol Med. 2020 Jun;50(8):1241-1256. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720001543. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
8
Reasons for providing assisted suicide and the expressivist objection: a response to Donaldson.提供协助自杀的理由和表现主义反对意见:对唐纳德森的回应。
J Med Ethics. 2024 Sep 20;50(10):721-722. doi: 10.1136/jme-2023-109697.
9
Ethics and the Legalization of Physician-Assisted Suicide: An American College of Physicians Position Paper.《医师协助自杀的伦理与合法化:美国医师学院立场文件》。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Oct 17;167(8):576-578. doi: 10.7326/M17-0938. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
10
Physician-assisted suicide: legal and ethical considerations.医生协助自杀:法律与伦理考量
J Health Law. 2007 Winter;40(1):29-63.