Yagi Minami, Matsumoto Kosuke, Komori Atsumasa, Abe Masanori, Hashimoto Naoaki, Inao Mie, Namisaki Tadashi, Kawata Kazuhito, Ninomiya Masashi, Fujii Hideki, Takahashi Atsushi, Kang Jong-Hon, Takamura Masaaki, Arakawa Mie, Joshita Satoru, Sato Ken, Itakura Jun, Nomura Takako, Kakisaka Keisuke, Kaneko Akira, Tamura Yamato, Miura Ryo, Aiso Mitsuhiko, Arizumi Toshihiko, Asaoka Yoshinari, Kikuchi Kentaro, Takikawa Yasuhiro, Masaki Tsutomu, Umemura Takeji, Honda Akira, Ohira Hiromasa, Kawada Norifumi, Yoshiji Hitoshi, Mochida Satoshi, Takikawa Hajime, Tanaka Atsushi
Department of Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Clinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization (NHO) Nagasaki Medical Center, Nagasaki, Japan.
Liver Int. 2020 Aug;40(8):1926-1933. doi: 10.1111/liv.14534. Epub 2020 May 30.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Although ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a first-line treatment for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), 20%-30% of patients with PBC exhibit an incomplete response to UDCA. Recently, the UDCA Response Score was proposed for predicting response to UDCA using pretreatment parameters in patients with PBC. We aimed to validate the UDCA Response Score in Japanese patients with PBC.
Registry data of Japanese patients (n = 873) were collected. Patients with data on all clinical parameters required for calculating the UDCA Response Score were selected. The endpoint was UDCA response, defined as alkaline phosphatase <1.67 times the upper limit of the normal value after 12 months of UDCA treatment.
All parameters were available in 804 patients (male/female = 120/684, age 58.9 [interquartile range 51.1-66.9] years). Bezafibrate was commenced within 12 months of UDCA in 78 patients (9.7%) because of the lack of an early response. We found that the endpoint was not reached in these 78 patients, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the score was 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.79). The AUROC was 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.83) in patients undergoing UDCA monotherapy (n = 726). Finally, the AUROC of the modified UDCA Response Score using only data from the treatment start date was 0.80 (95% CI 0.70-0.90) in patients receiving a combination therapy of UDCA and bezafibrate (n = 160).
The validity of the UDCA Response Score was acceptable in Japanese patients; this score will be informative in patients treated with a combination therapy of UDCA and bezafibrate.
背景/目的:尽管熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)是原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)的一线治疗药物,但20%-30%的PBC患者对UDCA治疗反应不完全。最近,有人提出使用PBC患者治疗前参数的UDCA反应评分来预测对UDCA的反应。我们旨在验证日本PBC患者的UDCA反应评分。
收集了日本患者(n = 873)的登记数据。选择具有计算UDCA反应评分所需所有临床参数数据的患者。终点为UDCA反应,定义为UDCA治疗12个月后碱性磷酸酶<正常上限的1.67倍。
804例患者(男/女=120/684,年龄58.9岁[四分位间距51.1-66.9岁])可获得所有参数。78例患者(9.7%)因缺乏早期反应在UDCA治疗12个月内开始使用苯扎贝特。我们发现这78例患者未达到终点,该评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.74(95%置信区间[CI]0.70-0.79)。接受UDCA单药治疗的患者(n = 726)的AUROC为0.77(95%CI 0.70-0.83)。最后,在接受UDCA和苯扎贝特联合治疗的患者(n = 160)中,仅使用治疗开始日期数据的改良UDCA反应评分的AUROC为0.80(95%CI 0.70-0.90)。
UDCA反应评分在日本患者中的有效性是可以接受的;该评分对接受UDCA和苯扎贝特联合治疗的患者具有参考价值。