• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈总动脉中远段支架置入术:支架内再狭窄的长期通畅率及危险因素。

Middle and Distal Common Carotid Artery Stenting: Long-Term Patency Rates and Risk Factors for In-Stent Restenosis.

机构信息

Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor Street 68, Budapest, 1122, Hungary.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Aug;43(8):1134-1142. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02522-5. Epub 2020 May 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00270-020-02522-5
PMID:32440962
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7369259/
Abstract

PURPOSE

In the absence of literature data, we aimed to determine the long-term patency rates of middle/distal common carotid artery (CCA) stenting and to investigate predisposing factors in the development of in-stent restenosis (ISR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-one patients (30 males, median age 63.5 years), who underwent stenting with 51 self-expandable stents for significant (≥ 60%) stenosis of the middle/distal CCA, were analyzed retrospectively. Patient (atherosclerotic risk factors, comorbidities, medications), vessel (elongation), lesion (stenosis grade, length, calcification, location), and stent characteristics (material, diameter, length, fracture) were examined. Duplex ultrasonography was used to monitor stent patency. The Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests, Kaplan-Meier analyses, and a log-rank test were used statistically.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 35 months (interquartile range, 20-102 months). Significant (≥ 70%) ISR developed in 14 patients (27.5%; stenosis, N = 10; entire CCA occlusion, N = 4). Primary patency rates were 98%, 92%, 83%, 73%, and 61% at 6, 12, 24, 60, and 96 months, respectively. Reintervention was performed in six patients (11.8%) with nonocclusive ISR. Secondary patency rates were 100% at 6 and 12 months and 96% at 24, 60, and 96 months. In-stent restenosis developed more frequently (P < .001) in patients with hyperlipidemia; primary patency rates were also significantly worse (Chi-square, 11.08; degrees of freedom, 1; P < .001) in patients with hyperlipidemia compared to those without.

CONCLUSION

Stenting of the middle/distal CCA can be performed with acceptable patency rates. If intervention is unequivocally needed, patients with hyperlipidemia will require closer follow-up care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3, Local non-random sample.

摘要

目的

由于缺乏文献数据,我们旨在确定中/远端颈总动脉(CCA)支架置入术的长期通畅率,并探讨支架内再狭窄(ISR)发生的相关因素。

材料与方法

回顾性分析了 51 例(30 例男性,中位年龄 63.5 岁)因中/远端 CCA 狭窄程度≥60%而行支架置入术的患者,共置入 51 枚自膨式支架。分析患者(动脉粥样硬化危险因素、合并症、药物使用情况)、血管(长度)、病变(狭窄程度、长度、钙化、位置)和支架特征(材料、直径、长度、断裂)。采用超声检查监测支架通畅情况。采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验、Fisher 确切概率法、Kaplan-Meier 分析和对数秩检验进行统计学分析。

结果

中位随访时间为 35 个月(四分位间距 20-102 个月)。14 例(27.5%;狭窄 10 例,整个 CCA 闭塞 4 例)患者出现明显(≥70%)ISR。6、12、24、60 和 96 个月时,初始通畅率分别为 98%、92%、83%、73%和 61%。6 例(11.8%)非闭塞性 ISR 患者行再次介入治疗。6 个月和 12 个月时,次级通畅率为 100%;24、60 和 96 个月时,次级通畅率为 96%。支架内再狭窄在高脂血症患者中更常见(P<0.001),并且在高脂血症患者中,初始通畅率也显著更差(卡方检验,11.08;自由度,1;P<0.001)。

结论

中/远端 CCA 支架置入术具有可接受的通畅率。如果需要进行干预,高脂血症患者需要更密切的随访。

证据等级

3 级,局部非随机样本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09bc/7369259/563f24f3b747/270_2020_2522_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09bc/7369259/c1f574899dd5/270_2020_2522_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09bc/7369259/5b503a55ba06/270_2020_2522_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09bc/7369259/563f24f3b747/270_2020_2522_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09bc/7369259/c1f574899dd5/270_2020_2522_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09bc/7369259/5b503a55ba06/270_2020_2522_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09bc/7369259/563f24f3b747/270_2020_2522_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Middle and Distal Common Carotid Artery Stenting: Long-Term Patency Rates and Risk Factors for In-Stent Restenosis.颈总动脉中远段支架置入术:支架内再狭窄的长期通畅率及危险因素。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Aug;43(8):1134-1142. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02522-5. Epub 2020 May 21.
2
Mid-term clinical outcome and predictors of vessel patency after femoropopliteal stenting with self-expandable nitinol stent.股腘动脉自膨式镍钛合金支架置入术后中期临床结果及血管通畅性的预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep;52(3):608-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.03.050. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
3
Reinterventions for stent restenosis in patients treated for atherosclerotic mesenteric artery disease.支架再狭窄患者的再介入治疗在治疗粥样硬化性肠系膜动脉疾病患者中的应用。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1422-1429.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.06.002. Epub 2011 Oct 2.
4
Long-term outcome following stent reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation and the role of geometric determinants.主动脉分叉支架重建后的长期预后及几何决定因素的作用
Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):346-57. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.12.013. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
5
The presence of long and heavily calcified lesions predisposes for fracture in patients undergoing stenting of the first part of the subclavian artery.锁骨下动脉第一段支架置入术患者中,长而严重钙化病变的存在易导致骨折。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Oct;70(4):1146-1154.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.056. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
6
Management of in-sent restenosis after carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients.高危患者颈动脉支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的管理。
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.040.
7
Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.支架置入后颈动脉的双功超声速度标准。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jan;47(1):63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.038.
8
The incidence and risk factors of stent fracture in patients treated for proximal common carotid artery stenosis.支架断裂的发生率及相关因素:治疗颈总动脉近段狭窄患者的研究
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Mar;71(3):824-831.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.492. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
9
Transcarotid Approach for Retrograde Stenting of Proximal Innominate and Common Carotid Artery Stenosis.经颈动脉途径逆行支架置入术治疗无名动脉和颈总动脉近端狭窄
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Aug;43:242-248. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 May 3.
10
Stent fractures after superficial femoral artery stenting: risk factors and impact on patency.股浅动脉支架置入术后支架断裂:危险因素及其对通畅率的影响。
J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Jun;22(3):319-26. doi: 10.1177/1526602815580783. Epub 2015 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Carotid Artery Stenting Intervention to Enhance Global Brain Blood Flow and Cognition in Carotid Artery Disease: Preliminary Findings from a Prospective Follow-Up MRI Study.颈动脉支架置入干预改善颈动脉疾病患者的全脑血流和认知功能:一项前瞻性随访MRI研究的初步结果
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 May 5;61(5):848. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050848.
2
Midterm Outcome of Balloon-Expandable Covered Stenting of Femoral Access Site Complications.股动脉穿刺部位并发症的球囊扩张式覆膜支架置入术的中期结果
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 31;13(21):6550. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216550.
3
Symptomatic Common Carotid Artery Stenosis Managed With Carotid Endarterectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Endovascular stenting of supra-aortic lesions using a transcarotid retrograde approach and flow reversal: A multicenter case series.经颈动脉逆行途径和血流逆转进行的主动脉以上病变血管内支架置入术:多中心病例系列研究。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jun;71(6):2012-2020.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.269. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
2
The incidence and risk factors of stent fracture in patients treated for proximal common carotid artery stenosis.支架断裂的发生率及相关因素:治疗颈总动脉近段狭窄患者的研究
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Mar;71(3):824-831.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.492. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
3
The presence of long and heavily calcified lesions predisposes for fracture in patients undergoing stenting of the first part of the subclavian artery.
采用颈动脉内膜切除术治疗有症状的颈总动脉狭窄
Cureus. 2023 Nov 19;15(11):e49062. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49062. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Genetic Variants in PHACTR1 & LPL Mediate Restenosis Risk in Coronary Artery Patients.PHACTR1 和 LPL 基因变异与冠状动脉患者再狭窄风险相关。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2023 Feb 16;19:83-92. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S394695. eCollection 2023.
5
Amputation and mortality rates of patients undergoing upper or lower limb surgical embolectomy and their predictors.接受上肢或下肢外科取栓术的患者的截肢率和死亡率及其预测因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 15;17(12):e0279095. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279095. eCollection 2022.
6
Predictive Value of Perioperative Cytokine Levels on the Risk for In-Stent Restenosis in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients.围手术期细胞因子水平对急性心肌梗死患者支架内再狭窄风险的预测价值。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Apr 23;2022:7832564. doi: 10.1155/2022/7832564. eCollection 2022.
7
Restenosis rates in patients with ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy and contralateral carotid artery stenting.同侧颈动脉内膜切除术和对侧颈动脉支架置入术后患者的再狭窄率。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 11;17(2):e0262735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262735. eCollection 2022.
锁骨下动脉第一段支架置入术患者中,长而严重钙化病变的存在易导致骨折。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Oct;70(4):1146-1154.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.01.056. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
4
The global burden of stroke: persistent and disabling.全球中风负担:持续存在且导致残疾。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 May;18(5):417-418. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30030-4. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
5
Arterial Tortuosity.动脉迂曲
Hypertension. 2019 May;73(5):951-960. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11647.
6
2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)合作制定的外周动脉疾病诊断和治疗指南。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018 Feb;71(2):111. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2017.12.014.
7
Editor's Choice - Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS).编辑推荐——动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉和椎动脉疾病的管理:欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)2017年临床实践指南
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Jan;55(1):3-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
8
Restenosis Predictors after Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting and Its Influence on Procedure Durability, Single-Center Experience.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术后再狭窄的预测因素及其对手术持久性的影响:单中心经验
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 Oct;26(10):2215-2222. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
9
Restenosis after carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术后再狭窄
Vascular. 2017 Dec;25(6):576-586. doi: 10.1177/1708538117706273. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
10
CREST-2: Identifying the Best Method of Stroke Prevention for Carotid Artery Stenosis: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Organizational Update.CREST-2:确定颈动脉狭窄最佳卒中预防方法:美国国立神经疾病和中风研究所组织更新
Stroke. 2017 May;48(5):e130-e131. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016051. Epub 2017 Apr 6.